American Battery Technology Company Common Stock Fundamental Analysis (NASDAQ: ABAT)
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock Fundamental Analysis (NASDAQ: ABAT)
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (NASDAQ: ABAT) shows weak financial fundamentals with a PE ratio of -4.76, profit margin of -3.90%, and ROE of -63.85%. The company generates $0.0B in annual revenue with N/A year-over-year growth of N/A.
Key Strengths
Areas of Concern
The stock receives a Fundamental Health Score of -408.9/100 based on profitability, valuation, growth, and balance sheet metrics. The F grade reflects weak fundamentals and significant financial concerns.
Fundamental Health Score
We analyze ABAT's fundamental strength across five key dimensions:
Efficiency Score
WeakABAT struggles to generate sufficient returns from assets.
Valuation Score
ExcellentABAT trades at attractive valuation levels.
Growth Score
WeakABAT faces weak or negative growth trends.
Financial Health Score
ExcellentABAT maintains a strong and stable balance sheet.
Profitability Score
WeakABAT struggles to sustain strong margins.
Key Financial Metrics
Is ABAT Expensive or Cheap?
P/E Ratio
ABAT trades at -4.76 times earnings. This suggests potential undervaluation.
PEG Ratio
When adjusting for growth, ABAT's PEG of -0.15 indicates potential undervaluation.
Price to Book
The market values American Battery Technology Company Common Stock at 2.97 times its book value. This may indicate undervaluation.
EV/EBITDA
Enterprise value stands at -6.36 times EBITDA. This is generally considered low.
How Well Does ABAT Make Money?
Net Profit Margin
For every $100 in sales, American Battery Technology Company Common Stock keeps $-3.90 as profit after all expenses.
Operating Margin
Core operations generate -3.82 in profit for every $100 in revenue, before interest and taxes.
ROE
Management delivers $-63.85 in profit for every $100 of shareholder equity.
ROA
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock generates $-53.24 in profit for every $100 in assets, demonstrating efficient asset deployment.
Following the Money - Real Cash Generation
Operating Cash Flow
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock generates limited operating cash flow of $-26.73M, signaling weaker underlying cash strength.
Free Cash Flow
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock generates weak or negative free cash flow of $-37.47M, restricting financial flexibility.
FCF Per Share
Each share generates $-0.27 in free cash annually.
FCF Yield
ABAT converts -10.33% of its market value into free cash.
Financial Ratios Analysis
Valuation Ratios
P/E Ratio
Price to earnings ratio
-4.76
vs 25 benchmark
PEG Ratio
Price/earnings to growth ratio
-0.15
vs 25 benchmark
P/B Ratio
Price to book value ratio
2.97
vs 25 benchmark
P/S Ratio
Price to sales ratio
21.28
vs 25 benchmark
Financial Health
Debt/Equity
Total debt to shareholders' equity
0.002
vs 25 benchmark
Current Ratio
Current assets to current liabilities
8.12
vs 25 benchmark
Efficiency Ratios
ROE
Return on equity percentage
-0.64
vs 25 benchmark
ROA
Return on assets percentage
-0.53
vs 25 benchmark
ROCE
Return on capital employed
-0.55
vs 25 benchmark
How ABAT Stacks Against Its Sector Peers
| Metric | ABAT Value | Sector Average | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | -4.76 | 29.88 | Better (Cheaper) |
| ROE | -63.85% | 1106.00% | Weak |
| Net Margin | -390.48% | -24767.00% (disorted) | Weak |
| Debt/Equity | 0.00 | 0.94 | Strong (Low Leverage) |
| Current Ratio | 8.12 | 21.64 | Strong Liquidity |
| ROA | -53.24% | -1320894.00% (disorted) | Weak |
ABAT outperforms its industry in 3 out of 6 key metrics, but lagging in ROE.
Historical Growth Performance
5-Year Growth Trajectory
This section reviews American Battery Technology Company Common Stock's 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and compares its performance against the typical investment style of its industry.
Revenue CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
EPS CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure
FCF CAGR
N/A
Industry Style: Cyclical, Value, Infrastructure