Afya Limited (AFYA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AFYA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFYA | $14.10 | -3.23% | 1.3B | 8.76 | $1.61 | +4.64% |
| EDU | $46.67 | +3.25% | 7.4B | 17.30 | $2.70 | +2.56% |
| TAL | $9.26 | -0.86% | 5.6B | 10.05 | $0.92 | N/A |
| LAUR | $36.76 | -3.14% | 5.1B | 19.66 | $1.87 | N/A |
| GHC | $1,174.18 | +1.55% | 5.1B | 17.40 | $67.66 | +0.63% |
| LRN | $97.71 | -1.77% | 4.1B | 15.27 | $6.39 | N/A |
| LOPE | $147.49 | -2.97% | 3.9B | 18.46 | $7.99 | N/A |
| ATGE | $106.64 | +1.49% | 3.9B | 15.71 | $6.79 | N/A |
| MH | $11.76 | -4.85% | 2.2B | -31.77 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| UTI | $39.14 | -4.02% | 2.2B | 51.51 | $0.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AFYA vs EDU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while EDU trades at $46.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check EDU's competition here
AFYA vs TAL Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while TAL trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check TAL's competition here
AFYA vs LAUR Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while LAUR trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check LAUR's competition here
AFYA vs GHC Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while GHC trades at $1,174.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check GHC's competition here
AFYA vs LRN Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while LRN trades at $97.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check LRN's competition here
AFYA vs LOPE Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while LOPE trades at $147.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check LOPE's competition here
AFYA vs ATGE Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while ATGE trades at $106.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check ATGE's competition here
AFYA vs MH Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while MH trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas MH's P/E ratio is -31.77. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to MH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check MH's competition here
AFYA vs UTI Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while UTI trades at $39.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 51.51. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check UTI's competition here
AFYA vs PRDO Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while PRDO trades at $34.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check PRDO's competition here
AFYA vs STRA Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while STRA trades at $77.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check STRA's competition here
AFYA vs LINC Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while LINC trades at $46.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 64.10. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to LINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check LINC's competition here
AFYA vs DAO Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while DAO trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 128.89. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check DAO's competition here
AFYA vs PXED Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PXED has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while PXED trades at $30.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas PXED's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PXED's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to PXED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check PXED's competition here
AFYA vs APEI Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 956.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while APEI trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check APEI's competition here
AFYA vs ARCE Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check ARCE's competition here
AFYA vs COUR Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while COUR trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check COUR's competition here
AFYA vs QSG Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 822.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while QSG trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check QSG's competition here
AFYA vs REDU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check REDU's competition here
AFYA vs UDMY Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while UDMY trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -92.60. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check UDMY's competition here
AFYA vs GOTU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while GOTU trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check GOTU's competition here
AFYA vs KLC Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 487.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while KLC trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check KLC's competition here
AFYA vs VSTA Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 394M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while VSTA trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check VSTA's competition here
AFYA vs VTRU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTRU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check VTRU's competition here
AFYA vs LGCY Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while LGCY trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check LGCY's competition here
AFYA vs SKIL-WT Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKIL-WT has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while SKIL-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas SKIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKIL-WT's ROE of +10.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to SKIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check SKIL-WT's competition here
AFYA vs CHGG Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while CHGG trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check CHGG's competition here
AFYA vs BEDU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while BEDU trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check BEDU's competition here
AFYA vs LFS Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LFS has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while LFS trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas LFS's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LFS's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to LFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check LFS's competition here
AFYA vs SKIL Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while SKIL trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKIL's ROE of +10.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check SKIL's competition here
AFYA vs ONE Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ONE's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check ONE's competition here
AFYA vs STG Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while STG trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check STG's competition here
AFYA vs AIU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check AIU's competition here
AFYA vs RYET Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while RYET trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYET's ROE of -10.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check RYET's competition here
AFYA vs YOUL Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YOUL has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while YOUL trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas YOUL's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YOUL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to YOUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check YOUL's competition here
AFYA vs YQ Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while YQ trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check YQ's competition here
AFYA vs GEHI Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check GEHI's competition here
AFYA vs GNS Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while GNS trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check GNS's competition here
AFYA vs AACG Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while AACG trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check AACG's competition here
AFYA vs EDTK Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while EDTK trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check EDTK's competition here
AFYA vs IH Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while IH trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check IH's competition here
AFYA vs JZ Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while JZ trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check JZ's competition here
AFYA vs TEDU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check TEDU's competition here
AFYA vs BTCT Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while BTCT trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check BTCT's competition here
AFYA vs VEDU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check VEDU's competition here
AFYA vs WAFU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while WAFU trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -55.33. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check WAFU's competition here
AFYA vs TCTM Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check TCTM's competition here
AFYA vs TWOU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check TWOU's competition here
AFYA vs CLEU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check CLEU's competition here
AFYA vs METX Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check METX's competition here
AFYA vs EEIQ Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while EEIQ trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check EEIQ's competition here
AFYA vs FEDU Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while FEDU trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check FEDU's competition here
AFYA vs MYND Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while MYND trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MYND's ROE of -9.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check MYND's competition here
AFYA vs KIDZ Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while KIDZ trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check KIDZ's competition here
AFYA vs RYB Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check RYB's competition here
AFYA vs GV Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 914.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while GV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GV's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check GV's competition here
AFYA vs GSUN Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 716.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while GSUN trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check GSUN's competition here
AFYA vs AMBO Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 382.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while AMBO trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check AMBO's competition here
AFYA vs LXEH Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 102.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while LXEH trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check LXEH's competition here
AFYA vs FCHL Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FCHL has a market cap of 55.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while FCHL trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas FCHL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCHL's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to FCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check FCHL's competition here
AFYA vs KIDZW Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 21.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while KIDZW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check KIDZW's competition here
AFYA vs BTCTW Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check BTCTW's competition here
AFYA vs HLG Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check HLG's competition here
AFYA vs APOL Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, APOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while APOL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas APOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APOL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to APOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check APOL's competition here
AFYA vs METXW Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, METXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while METXW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas METXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to METXW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to METXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check METXW's competition here
AFYA vs FHS Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check FHS's competition here
AFYA vs NEW Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check NEW's competition here
AFYA vs ZME Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check ZME's competition here
AFYA vs HMHC Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check HMHC's competition here
AFYA vs GPX Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check GPX's competition here
AFYA vs TTEI Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TTEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while TTEI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas TTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTEI's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AFYA has daily volatility of 3.62 and TTEI has daily volatility of N/A.Check TTEI's competition here
AFYA vs ZVO Comparison June 2026
AFYA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFYA stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFYA is priced at $14.10, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFYA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AFYA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFYA is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFYA.Check ZVO's competition here