Avnet, Inc. (AVT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AVT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Technology Distributors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVT | $91.47 | +1.85% | 7.5B | 35.32 | $2.59 | +1.53% |
| SNX | $284.56 | +0.26% | 22.9B | 23.67 | $12.02 | +0.65% |
| ARW | $232.70 | +2.97% | 11.9B | 16.65 | $13.98 | N/A |
| NSIT | $108.44 | +1.38% | 3.3B | 19.33 | $5.61 | N/A |
| CNXN | $70.57 | +1.34% | 1.8B | 20.51 | $3.44 | +0.99% |
| SCSC | $49.63 | +2.04% | 1B | 15.09 | $3.29 | N/A |
| SNPO | $10.75 | +0.09% | 822.8M | -27.56 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| CLMB | $22.71 | +0.84% | 422.3M | 19.92 | $1.14 | +0.37% |
| ORBS | $1.03 | +0.00% | 203.8M | -0.29 | -$3.59 | N/A |
| INHD | $39.49 | +0.00% | 178.5M | -0.51 | -$76.80 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AVT vs SNX Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SNX has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while SNX trades at $284.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas SNX's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to SNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check SNX's competition here
AVT vs ARW Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ARW has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while ARW trades at $232.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas ARW's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to ARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check ARW's competition here
AVT vs NSIT Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while NSIT trades at $108.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check NSIT's competition here
AVT vs CNXN Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CNXN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while CNXN trades at $70.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas CNXN's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNXN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is more volatile compared to CNXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check CNXN's competition here
AVT vs SCSC Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SCSC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while SCSC trades at $49.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas SCSC's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCSC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to SCSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check SCSC's competition here
AVT vs SNPO Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SNPO has a market cap of 822.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while SNPO trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas SNPO's P/E ratio is -27.56. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNPO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is more volatile compared to SNPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check SNPO's competition here
AVT vs CLMB Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CLMB has a market cap of 422.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while CLMB trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas CLMB's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLMB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to CLMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check CLMB's competition here
AVT vs ORBS Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while ORBS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check ORBS's competition here
AVT vs INHD Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while INHD trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check INHD's competition here
AVT vs WSTG Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WSTG has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while WSTG trades at $31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas WSTG's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WSTG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to WSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check WSTG's competition here
AVT vs TAIT Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TAIT has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while TAIT trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas TAIT's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAIT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to TAIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check TAIT's competition here
AVT vs IZM Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IZM has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while IZM trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas IZM's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IZM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to IZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check IZM's competition here
AVT vs AEY Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AEY has a market cap of 538.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while AEY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas AEY's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is less volatile compared to AEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check AEY's competition here
AVT vs CKP Comparison June 2026
AVT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AVT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AVT is priced at $91.47, while CKP trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AVT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.32, whereas CKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AVT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CKP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AVT is more volatile compared to CKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AVT.Check CKP's competition here