Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCS | $63.25 | +5.61% | 1.8B | 14.25 | $4.44 | +1.93% |
| DHI | $157.81 | +3.50% | 44.8B | 14.82 | $10.65 | +1.11% |
| PHM | $126.96 | +4.17% | 24.2B | 12.28 | $10.34 | +0.79% |
| LEN | $89.73 | +3.76% | 22.3B | 14.06 | $6.38 | +2.23% |
| LEN-B | $87.44 | +3.15% | 22.3B | 13.71 | $6.38 | +2.23% |
| NVR | $6,490.93 | +3.43% | 17.5B | 15.85 | $409.43 | N/A |
| TOL | $155.67 | +4.02% | 14.6B | 11.82 | $13.17 | +0.65% |
| TMHC | $71.58 | -0.01% | 6.6B | 10.67 | $6.71 | N/A |
| IBP | $218.25 | +3.28% | 5.9B | 23.29 | $9.37 | +1.52% |
| MTH | $75.73 | +4.53% | 5.1B | 13.82 | $5.48 | +2.40% |
Stock Comparison
CCS vs DHI Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DHI has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while DHI trades at $157.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas DHI's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to DHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check DHI's competition here
CCS vs PHM Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PHM has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while PHM trades at $126.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas PHM's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to PHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check PHM's competition here
CCS vs LEN Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LEN has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while LEN trades at $89.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas LEN's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to LEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LEN's competition here
CCS vs LEN-B Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LEN-B has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while LEN-B trades at $87.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas LEN-B's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEN-B's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to LEN-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LEN-B's competition here
CCS vs NVR Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NVR has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while NVR trades at $6,490.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NVR's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to NVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check NVR's competition here
CCS vs TOL Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TOL has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while TOL trades at $155.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas TOL's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to TOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check TOL's competition here
CCS vs TMHC Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TMHC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while TMHC trades at $71.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas TMHC's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to TMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check TMHC's competition here
CCS vs IBP Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while IBP trades at $218.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check IBP's competition here
CCS vs MTH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MTH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while MTH trades at $75.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas MTH's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to MTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check MTH's competition here
CCS vs MDC Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MDC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while MDC trades at $62.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas MDC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to MDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check MDC's competition here
CCS vs CVCO Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CVCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while CVCO trades at $601.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CVCO's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVCO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to CVCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check CVCO's competition here
CCS vs SKY Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SKY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while SKY trades at $83.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas SKY's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to SKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check SKY's competition here
CCS vs TPH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TPH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while TPH trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas TPH's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to TPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check TPH's competition here
CCS vs MHO Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MHO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while MHO trades at $149.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas MHO's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to MHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check MHO's competition here
CCS vs KBH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KBH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while KBH trades at $54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas KBH's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to KBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check KBH's competition here
CCS vs GRBK Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRBK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while GRBK trades at $74.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas GRBK's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRBK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to GRBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check GRBK's competition here
CCS vs GRBK-PA Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRBK-PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while GRBK-PA trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas GRBK-PA's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRBK-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to GRBK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check GRBK-PA's competition here
CCS vs HOVNP Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HOVNP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while HOVNP trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HOVNP's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOVNP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to HOVNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check HOVNP's competition here
CCS vs DFH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DFH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while DFH trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas DFH's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DFH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to DFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check DFH's competition here
CCS vs LGIH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LGIH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while LGIH trades at $56.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas LGIH's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGIH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to LGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LGIH's competition here
CCS vs BZH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BZH has a market cap of 739.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while BZH trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas BZH's P/E ratio is -150.28. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to BZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check BZH's competition here
CCS vs HOV Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HOV has a market cap of 668.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while HOV trades at $131.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HOV's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to HOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check HOV's competition here
CCS vs LEGH Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LEGH has a market cap of 594.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while LEGH trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas LEGH's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEGH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to LEGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check LEGH's competition here
CCS vs SIC Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SIC has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while SIC trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas SIC's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to SIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check SIC's competition here
CCS vs UHG Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UHG has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while UHG trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UHG's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UHG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to UHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check UHG's competition here
CCS vs SPHL Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SPHL has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while SPHL trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas SPHL's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPHL's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is less volatile compared to SPHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check SPHL's competition here
CCS vs NWHM Comparison June 2026
CCS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCS stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NWHM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCS is priced at $63.25, while NWHM trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NWHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NWHM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCS is more volatile compared to NWHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCS.Check NWHM's competition here