Cera Sanitaryware Limited (CERA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CERA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERA.BO | ₹5,862.95 | +0.25% | 75.6B | 37.08 | ₹158.12 | +1.11% |
| SUPREMEIND.NS | ₹3,488.50 | -0.32% | 443.1B | 46.48 | ₹75.06 | +1.00% |
| SUPREMEIND.BO | ₹3,481.60 | -0.57% | 442B | 46.35 | ₹75.12 | +1.00% |
| ASTRAL.NS | ₹1,501.50 | -1.61% | 403.4B | 75.11 | ₹19.99 | +0.25% |
| ASTRAL.BO | ₹1,499.50 | -1.78% | 402.6B | 74.97 | ₹20.00 | +0.25% |
| GRINDWELL.BO | ₹1,915.35 | -0.90% | 212.1B | 55.71 | ₹34.38 | +0.88% |
| GRINDWELL.NS | ₹1,914.80 | -0.95% | 212B | 50.93 | ₹37.60 | +0.88% |
| KAJARIACER.BO | ₹1,068.20 | -1.03% | 170.3B | 41.92 | ₹25.48 | +1.11% |
| KAJARIACER.NS | ₹1,067.40 | -1.20% | 170B | 41.91 | ₹25.47 | +1.11% |
| FINPIPE.NS | ₹171.00 | -1.17% | 105.7B | 17.65 | ₹9.69 | +2.08% |
Stock Comparison
CERA.BO vs SUPREMEIND.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.NS has a market cap of 443.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while SUPREMEIND.NS trades at ₹3,488.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas SUPREMEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 46.48. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUPREMEIND.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SUPREMEIND.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.BO has a market cap of 442B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while SUPREMEIND.BO trades at ₹3,481.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas SUPREMEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.35. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUPREMEIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASTRAL.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASTRAL.NS has a market cap of 403.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ASTRAL.NS trades at ₹1,501.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ASTRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 75.11. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTRAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASTRAL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASTRAL.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASTRAL.BO has a market cap of 402.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ASTRAL.BO trades at ₹1,499.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ASTRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 74.97. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTRAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASTRAL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs GRINDWELL.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.BO has a market cap of 212.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while GRINDWELL.BO trades at ₹1,915.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas GRINDWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINDWELL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to GRINDWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check GRINDWELL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs GRINDWELL.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.NS has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while GRINDWELL.NS trades at ₹1,914.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas GRINDWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 50.93. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINDWELL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to GRINDWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check GRINDWELL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs KAJARIACER.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.BO has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while KAJARIACER.BO trades at ₹1,068.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas KAJARIACER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAJARIACER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check KAJARIACER.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs KAJARIACER.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.NS has a market cap of 170B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while KAJARIACER.NS trades at ₹1,067.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas KAJARIACER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.91. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAJARIACER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check KAJARIACER.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs FINPIPE.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FINPIPE.NS has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while FINPIPE.NS trades at ₹171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas FINPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to FINPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check FINPIPE.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs CERA.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CERA.NS has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while CERA.NS trades at ₹5,869.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas CERA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CERA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to CERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check CERA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹272.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹272.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs POKARNA.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, POKARNA.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while POKARNA.NS trades at ₹812.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas POKARNA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POKARNA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to POKARNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check POKARNA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs POKARNA.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, POKARNA.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while POKARNA.BO trades at ₹811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas POKARNA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POKARNA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to POKARNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check POKARNA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs RAMCOIND.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while RAMCOIND.NS trades at ₹287.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas RAMCOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMCOIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check RAMCOIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs RAMCOIND.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.BO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while RAMCOIND.BO trades at ₹287.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas RAMCOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMCOIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check RAMCOIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs NITCO.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NITCO.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while NITCO.NS trades at ₹97.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas NITCO.NS's P/E ratio is 81.72. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NITCO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to NITCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check NITCO.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs NITCO.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NITCO.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while NITCO.BO trades at ₹97.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas NITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 81.72. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NITCO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to NITCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check NITCO.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs APOLLOPIPE.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPE.NS has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while APOLLOPIPE.NS trades at ₹491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas APOLLOPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 472.12. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check APOLLOPIPE.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SOMANYCERA.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while SOMANYCERA.NS trades at ₹501.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas SOMANYCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOMANYCERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SOMANYCERA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs SOMANYCERA.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.BO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while SOMANYCERA.BO trades at ₹499.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas SOMANYCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOMANYCERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SOMANYCERA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs HIL.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HIL.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while HIL.NS trades at ₹1,845.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas HIL.NS's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to HIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HIL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs HIL.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HIL.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while HIL.BO trades at ₹1,843.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas HIL.BO's P/E ratio is -42.18. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to HIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HIL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASIANTILES.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.NS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ASIANTILES.NS trades at ₹58.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ASIANTILES.NS's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASIANTILES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASIANTILES.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ASIANTILES.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.BO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ASIANTILES.BO trades at ₹58.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ASIANTILES.BO's P/E ratio is 83.69. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASIANTILES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ASIANTILES.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs HARDWYN.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HARDWYN.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while HARDWYN.NS trades at ₹24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas HARDWYN.NS's P/E ratio is 88.96. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HARDWYN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HARDWYN.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs HARDWYN.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HARDWYN.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while HARDWYN.BO trades at ₹24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas HARDWYN.BO's P/E ratio is 89.04. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HARDWYN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check HARDWYN.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs SEJALLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SEJALLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while SEJALLTD.NS trades at ₹686.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas SEJALLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEJALLTD.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to SEJALLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check SEJALLTD.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs BIGBLOC.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while BIGBLOC.BO trades at ₹48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas BIGBLOC.BO's P/E ratio is -407.08. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIGBLOC.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BIGBLOC.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs BIGBLOC.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while BIGBLOC.NS trades at ₹48.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas BIGBLOC.NS's P/E ratio is -406.50. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIGBLOC.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BIGBLOC.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs VISAKAIND.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while VISAKAIND.BO trades at ₹78.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas VISAKAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VISAKAIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to VISAKAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check VISAKAIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs VISAKAIND.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while VISAKAIND.NS trades at ₹77.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas VISAKAIND.NS's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VISAKAIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to VISAKAIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check VISAKAIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs KRITIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KRITIIND.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while KRITIIND.BO trades at ₹117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas KRITIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITIIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to KRITIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check KRITIIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs PPL.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PPL.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while PPL.NS trades at ₹236.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas PPL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to PPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check PPL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs PPL.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PPL.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while PPL.BO trades at ₹236.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas PPL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to PPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check PPL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs EVERESTIND.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while EVERESTIND.NS trades at ₹341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas EVERESTIND.NS's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVERESTIND.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to EVERESTIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EVERESTIND.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs EVERESTIND.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while EVERESTIND.BO trades at ₹345.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas EVERESTIND.BO's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVERESTIND.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to EVERESTIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EVERESTIND.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTBELL.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ORIENTBELL.BO trades at ₹324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ORIENTBELL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTBELL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTBELL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTBELL.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ORIENTBELL.NS trades at ₹320.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ORIENTBELL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTBELL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTBELL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs KRITI.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KRITI.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while KRITI.NS trades at ₹72.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas KRITI.NS's P/E ratio is 345.67. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to KRITI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check KRITI.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs EXXARO.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EXXARO.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while EXXARO.NS trades at ₹6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas EXXARO.NS's P/E ratio is 108.83. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXXARO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to EXXARO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EXXARO.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs EXXARO.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EXXARO.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while EXXARO.BO trades at ₹6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas EXXARO.BO's P/E ratio is 109.17. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXXARO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to EXXARO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EXXARO.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs MURUDCERA.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while MURUDCERA.NS trades at ₹30.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas MURUDCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MURUDCERA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MURUDCERA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs MURUDCERA.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while MURUDCERA.BO trades at ₹30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas MURUDCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MURUDCERA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MURUDCERA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs BEARDSELL.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while BEARDSELL.BO trades at ₹37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas BEARDSELL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEARDSELL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BEARDSELL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs TEXMOPIPES.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while TEXMOPIPES.NS trades at ₹45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas TEXMOPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TEXMOPIPES.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs TEXMOPIPES.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while TEXMOPIPES.BO trades at ₹45.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas TEXMOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TEXMOPIPES.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs BEARDSELL.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while BEARDSELL.NS trades at ₹28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas BEARDSELL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEARDSELL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check BEARDSELL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs REGENCERAM.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, REGENCERAM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while REGENCERAM.BO trades at ₹41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas REGENCERAM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REGENCERAM.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to REGENCERAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check REGENCERAM.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs REGENCERAM.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, REGENCERAM.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while REGENCERAM.NS trades at ₹40.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas REGENCERAM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REGENCERAM.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to REGENCERAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check REGENCERAM.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs AHLADA.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, AHLADA.NS has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while AHLADA.NS trades at ₹39.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas AHLADA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLADA.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to AHLADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check AHLADA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTALTL.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.BO has a market cap of 471.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ORIENTALTL.BO trades at ₹6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ORIENTALTL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTALTL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTALTL.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs ORIENTALTL.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.NS has a market cap of 469M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while ORIENTALTL.NS trades at ₹6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas ORIENTALTL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTALTL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check ORIENTALTL.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs AROGRANITE.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.BO has a market cap of 404.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while AROGRANITE.BO trades at ₹26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas AROGRANITE.BO's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AROGRANITE.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check AROGRANITE.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs AROGRANITE.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.NS has a market cap of 379.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while AROGRANITE.NS trades at ₹24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas AROGRANITE.NS's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AROGRANITE.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check AROGRANITE.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs MADHAV.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MADHAV.NS has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while MADHAV.NS trades at ₹36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas MADHAV.NS's P/E ratio is -17.27. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MADHAV.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to MADHAV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MADHAV.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs MADHAV.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MADHAV.BO has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while MADHAV.BO trades at ₹36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas MADHAV.BO's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MADHAV.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is more volatile compared to MADHAV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check MADHAV.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs LEXUS.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, LEXUS.NS has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while LEXUS.NS trades at ₹15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas LEXUS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEXUS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to LEXUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check LEXUS.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs TIJARIA.BO Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TIJARIA.BO has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while TIJARIA.BO trades at ₹4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas TIJARIA.BO's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIJARIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TIJARIA.BO's competition here
CERA.BO vs TIJARIA.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TIJARIA.NS has a market cap of 126.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while TIJARIA.NS trades at ₹4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas TIJARIA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIJARIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check TIJARIA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs EUROCERA.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EUROCERA.NS has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while EUROCERA.NS trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas EUROCERA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EUROCERA.NS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CERA.BO is less volatile compared to EUROCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CERA.BO.Check EUROCERA.NS's competition here
CERA.BO vs TIL-RE.NS Comparison June 2026
CERA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CERA.BO stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TIL-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CERA.BO is priced at ₹5,862.95, while TIL-RE.NS trades at ₹158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CERA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.08, whereas TIL-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CERA.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIL-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CERA.BO has daily volatility of 2.69 and TIL-RE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TIL-RE.NS's competition here