Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while VZA trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VZA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while VZ trades at $49.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VZ's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 194.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TMUS trades at $184.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TMUS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TBC trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TBC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while T trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas T's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check T's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SPCK has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while SPCK trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas SPCK's P/E ratio is -19.96. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPCK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SPCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SPCK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TBB trades at $19.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TBB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 157.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while T-PC trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check T-PC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while T-PA trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check T-PA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CMCSV has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CMCSV trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CMCSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CMCSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CMCSV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CMCSA trades at $26.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CMCSA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while AMX trades at $23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check AMX's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while AMOV trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check AMOV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while VOD trades at $15.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VOD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ORAN trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ORAN's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ASTS trades at $66.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -36.55. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ASTS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while SATS trades at $86.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -49.14. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SATS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while BCE trades at $23.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check BCE's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TEF trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TEF's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CHTR trades at $148.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CHTR's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while RCI trades at $36.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check RCI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while VIV trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VIV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TU trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TU's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TIGO trades at $91.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TIGO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while SJR trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SJR's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while SKM trades at $40.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SKM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TLK trades at $14.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TLK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ECHO trades at $86.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECHO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ECHO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBDAV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBDKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while GSAT trades at $82.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -174.47. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GSAT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while FYBR trades at $38.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check FYBR's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while MBT trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check MBT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while KT trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CTDD trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTDD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTDD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TIMB trades at $17.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TIMB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while USM trades at $77.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check USM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LUMN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LUMN's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TEO trades at $13.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TEO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBRDK trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBRDK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBRDA trades at $35.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBRDA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while IRDM trades at $48.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 48.94. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check IRDM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TKC trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TKC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBYKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TDS-PV trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TDS-PV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TDS-PU trades at $20.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TDS-PU's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while PHI trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check PHI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while SNRE trades at $55.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -54.59. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SNRE's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBTYB trades at $12.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBTYB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CTBB trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTBB's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while VEON trades at $56.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check VEON's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TDS trades at $34.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TDS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBTYK trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBTYK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBTYA trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBTYA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SNREV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while SNREV trades at $50.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas SNREV's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNREV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to SNREV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SNREV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LILAP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LILAP trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LILAP's P/E ratio is -78.63. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILAP's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LBRDP trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LBRDP's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while UZD trades at $19.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check UZD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while UZF trades at $16.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check UZF's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while DISH trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DISH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check DISH's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while UZE trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check UZE's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while AD trades at $35.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to AD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check AD's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while KYIV trades at $13.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KYIV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while IHS trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check IHS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LILKV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LILKV trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LILKV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILKV's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LILAK trades at $8.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -16.76. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILAK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LILA trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ASTSW's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while IDT trades at $67.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check IDT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ATEX trades at $86.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ATEX's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while RADI trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check RADI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TV trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, LILAV has a market cap of 863.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while LILAV trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas LILAV's P/E ratio is -47.41. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to LILAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check LILAV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ATUS trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ATUS's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 682.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while SHEN trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check SHEN's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 655.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while TSAT trades at $44.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check TSAT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 563.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while OOMA trades at $20.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check OOMA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CNSL trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CNSL's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 501.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CCOI trades at $9.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCOI's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CCOI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 479M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ATNI trades at $31.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATNI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ATNI's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while WOW trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check WOW's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 413.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while OPTU trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check OPTU's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 355.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while GOGO trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GOGO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CTGG has a market cap of 333.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CTGG trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CTGG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTGG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CTGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTGG's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while HCHC trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check HCHC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CTHH has a market cap of 258.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CTHH trades at $16.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CTHH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTHH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to CTHH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CTHH's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 203.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CXDO trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CXDO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while RDCM trades at $10.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check RDCM's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while CABO trades at $24.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check CABO's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLBKV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLBAV's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while GLIBA trades at $26.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLIBA's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while GLIBK trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check GLIBK's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while MTSL trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check MTSL's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KORE-WT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while KORE-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas KORE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to KORE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KORE-WT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while KYIVW trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is more volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check KYIVW's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ELWT trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELWT's ROE of -41.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ELWT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ELWT's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while OMCC trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check OMCC's competition here

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (NYSE: CHT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CHT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, CHT is priced at $43.60 on the NYSE, while ANTE trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CHT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.19, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CHT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHT is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHT.Check ANTE's competition here