Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CON.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CON.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON.DE | €70.34 | -0.62% | 14.1B | -46.61 | -€1.51 | +3.84% |
| KBX.DE | €94.45 | -1.41% | 15.2B | 24.60 | €3.84 | +2.01% |
| HLE.DE | €66.30 | -1.19% | 7.4B | 64.40 | €1.03 | +0.33% |
| SHA0.DE | €5.50 | -0.90% | 5.2B | -4.57 | -€1.20 | +5.45% |
| AMV0.DE | €31.85 | -1.85% | 3.2B | -5.65 | -€5.64 | N/A |
| SHA.DE | €4.58 | +3.79% | 3B | 10.17 | €0.45 | +9.83% |
| GTR.DE | €7.97 | +0.18% | 2.3B | -4.92 | -€1.62 | N/A |
| VTSC.DE | €52.90 | -0.09% | 2.1B | 85.32 | €0.62 | +0.47% |
| SFQ.DE | €21.85 | +2.82% | 991.9M | 14.33 | €1.52 | +2.97% |
| JST.DE | €60.40 | +4.50% | 990M | -75.42 | -€0.80 | +2.48% |
Stock Comparison
Knorr-Bremse AG (XETRA: KBX.DE)
CON.DE vs KBX.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, KBX.DE has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while KBX.DE trades at €94.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas KBX.DE's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KBX.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to KBX.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check KBX.DE's competition here
HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA (XETRA: HLE.DE)
CON.DE vs HLE.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, HLE.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while HLE.DE trades at €66.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas HLE.DE's P/E ratio is 64.40. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HLE.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to HLE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check HLE.DE's competition here
Schaeffler AG (XETRA: SHA0.DE)
CON.DE vs SHA0.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, SHA0.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while SHA0.DE trades at €5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas SHA0.DE's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHA0.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to SHA0.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check SHA0.DE's competition here
Aumovio SE (XETRA: AMV0.DE)
CON.DE vs AMV0.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, AMV0.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while AMV0.DE trades at €31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas AMV0.DE's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMV0.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to AMV0.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check AMV0.DE's competition here
Schaeffler AG (XETRA: SHA.DE)
CON.DE vs SHA.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, SHA.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while SHA.DE trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas SHA.DE's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHA.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to SHA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check SHA.DE's competition here
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (XETRA: GTR.DE)
CON.DE vs GTR.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GTR.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while GTR.DE trades at €7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas GTR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GTR.DE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to GTR.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check GTR.DE's competition here
Vitesco Technologies Group AG (XETRA: VTSC.DE)
CON.DE vs VTSC.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, VTSC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while VTSC.DE trades at €52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas VTSC.DE's P/E ratio is 85.32. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VTSC.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to VTSC.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check VTSC.DE's competition here
SAF-Holland SE (XETRA: SFQ.DE)
CON.DE vs SFQ.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, SFQ.DE has a market cap of 991.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while SFQ.DE trades at €21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas SFQ.DE's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SFQ.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to SFQ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check SFQ.DE's competition here
JOST Werke AG (XETRA: JST.DE)
CON.DE vs JST.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, JST.DE has a market cap of 990M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while JST.DE trades at €60.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas JST.DE's P/E ratio is -75.42. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JST.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to JST.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check JST.DE's competition here
ElringKlinger AG (XETRA: ZIL2.DE)
CON.DE vs ZIL2.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ZIL2.DE has a market cap of 363.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while ZIL2.DE trades at €5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas ZIL2.DE's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZIL2.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to ZIL2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check ZIL2.DE's competition here
Stabilus SE (XETRA: STM.DE)
CON.DE vs STM.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, STM.DE has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while STM.DE trades at €14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas STM.DE's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STM.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to STM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check STM.DE's competition here
EDAG Engineering Group AG (XETRA: ED4.DE)
CON.DE vs ED4.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ED4.DE has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while ED4.DE trades at €3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas ED4.DE's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ED4.DE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to ED4.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check ED4.DE's competition here
Grammer AG (XETRA: GMM.DE)
CON.DE vs GMM.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GMM.DE has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while GMM.DE trades at €8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas GMM.DE's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GMM.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to GMM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check GMM.DE's competition here
Voltabox AG (XETRA: VBX.DE)
CON.DE vs VBX.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, VBX.DE has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while VBX.DE trades at €4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas VBX.DE's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VBX.DE's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to VBX.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check VBX.DE's competition here
Novem Group S.A. (XETRA: NVM.DE)
CON.DE vs NVM.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, NVM.DE has a market cap of 84.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while NVM.DE trades at €1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas NVM.DE's P/E ratio is -32.82. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVM.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to NVM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check NVM.DE's competition here
Bertrandt AG (XETRA: BDT.DE)
CON.DE vs BDT.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BDT.DE has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while BDT.DE trades at €7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas BDT.DE's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BDT.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to BDT.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check BDT.DE's competition here
Voltatron AG (XETRA: VOTR.DE)
CON.DE vs VOTR.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, VOTR.DE has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while VOTR.DE trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas VOTR.DE's P/E ratio is -47.38. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VOTR.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to VOTR.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check VOTR.DE's competition here
Polytec Holding AG (XETRA: P4N.DE)
CON.DE vs P4N.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, P4N.DE has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while P4N.DE trades at €3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas P4N.DE's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to P4N.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to P4N.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check P4N.DE's competition here
PWO AG (XETRA: PWO.DE)
CON.DE vs PWO.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PWO.DE has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while PWO.DE trades at €20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas PWO.DE's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PWO.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to PWO.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check PWO.DE's competition here
MS Industrie AG (XETRA: MSAG.DE)
CON.DE vs MSAG.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MSAG.DE has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while MSAG.DE trades at €1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas MSAG.DE's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSAG.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to MSAG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check MSAG.DE's competition here
STS Group AG (XETRA: SF3.DE)
CON.DE vs SF3.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, SF3.DE has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while SF3.DE trades at €3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas SF3.DE's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SF3.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to SF3.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check SF3.DE's competition here
HWA AG (XETRA: H9W.DE)
CON.DE vs H9W.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, H9W.DE has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while H9W.DE trades at €2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas H9W.DE's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to H9W.DE's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to H9W.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check H9W.DE's competition here
Compleo Charging Solutions AG (XETRA: C0M.DE)
CON.DE vs C0M.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, C0M.DE has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while C0M.DE trades at €2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas C0M.DE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to C0M.DE's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to C0M.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check C0M.DE's competition here
InTiCa Systems AG (XETRA: IS7.DE)
CON.DE vs IS7.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, IS7.DE has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while IS7.DE trades at €1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas IS7.DE's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IS7.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to IS7.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check IS7.DE's competition here
paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA (XETRA: PGN.DE)
CON.DE vs PGN.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PGN.DE has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while PGN.DE trades at €1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas PGN.DE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PGN.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to PGN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check PGN.DE's competition here
Clean Logistics SE (XETRA: SD1.DE)
CON.DE vs SD1.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, SD1.DE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while SD1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas SD1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SD1.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to SD1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check SD1.DE's competition here
hGears AG (XETRA: HGEA.DE)
CON.DE vs HGEA.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, HGEA.DE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while HGEA.DE trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas HGEA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HGEA.DE's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to HGEA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check HGEA.DE's competition here
Baumot Group AG (XETRA: TINC.DE)
CON.DE vs TINC.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, TINC.DE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while TINC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas TINC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TINC.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is less volatile compared to TINC.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check TINC.DE's competition here
OSRAM Licht AG (XETRA: OSR.DE)
CON.DE vs OSR.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, OSR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while OSR.DE trades at €52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas OSR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OSR.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to OSR.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check OSR.DE's competition here
Mercedes-Benz Group AG (XETRA: DAI.DE)
CON.DE vs DAI.DE Comparison November 2026
Continental AG (XETRA: CON.DE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CON.DE stands at 14.1B. In comparison, DAI.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CON.DE is priced at €70.34 on the XETRA, while DAI.DE trades at €70.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CON.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -46.61, whereas DAI.DE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, CON.DE's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DAI.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CON.DE is more volatile compared to DAI.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CON.DE.Check DAI.DE's competition here