EIDP, Inc. USD 4.50 Cum Pfd Registered Shs (CTA-PB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTA-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTA-PB | $67.12 | -0.12% | 58.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.97% |
| CTVA | $75.59 | -0.36% | 50.2B | 40.55 | $1.85 | +0.97% |
| CTA-PA | $53.53 | -0.21% | 35.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.97% |
| NTR | $67.33 | +0.07% | 31.9B | 13.51 | $4.91 | +3.36% |
| CF | $109.61 | +0.14% | 16.7B | 9.78 | $11.10 | +1.83% |
| ICL | $5.73 | +2.42% | 7.2B | 26.62 | $0.21 | +3.47% |
| MOS | $22.59 | +5.66% | 6.8B | 152.00 | $0.14 | +4.44% |
| SMG | $62.16 | +8.05% | 3.5B | 17.13 | $3.48 | +4.45% |
| FMC | $11.64 | +4.86% | 1.4B | -0.59 | -$19.62 | +12.22% |
| UAN | $113.20 | -2.59% | 1.2B | 10.16 | $11.49 | +10.54% |
Stock Comparison
CTA-PB vs CTVA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while CTVA trades at $75.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 40.55. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check CTVA's competition here
CTA-PB vs CTA-PA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while CTA-PA trades at $53.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check CTA-PA's competition here
CTA-PB vs NTR Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while NTR trades at $67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check NTR's competition here
CTA-PB vs CF Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while CF trades at $109.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check CF's competition here
CTA-PB vs ICL Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while ICL trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check ICL's competition here
CTA-PB vs MOS Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while MOS trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 152.00. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check MOS's competition here
CTA-PB vs SMG Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while SMG trades at $62.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check SMG's competition here
CTA-PB vs FMC Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while FMC trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check FMC's competition here
CTA-PB vs UAN Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while UAN trades at $113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check UAN's competition here
CTA-PB vs IPI Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 464.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while IPI trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check IPI's competition here
CTA-PB vs AVD Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while AVD trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check AVD's competition here
CTA-PB vs BHST Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while BHST trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHST's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check BHST's competition here
CTA-PB vs BHIL-WT Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
CTA-PB vs CGA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB and CGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGA's competition here
CTA-PB vs BIOX Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while BIOX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check BIOX's competition here
CTA-PB vs LVRO Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVRO's ROE of +11.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB and LVRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LVRO's competition here
CTA-PB vs SEED Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while SEED trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check SEED's competition here
CTA-PB vs AGRZ Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while AGRZ trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check AGRZ's competition here
CTA-PB vs SVFD Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -367.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check SVFD's competition here
CTA-PB vs FMTO Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check FMTO's competition here
CTA-PB vs BHIL Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB and BHIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHIL's competition here
CTA-PB vs RKDA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while RKDA trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check RKDA's competition here
CTA-PB vs YTEN Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check YTEN's competition here
CTA-PB vs TNH Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while TNH trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check TNH's competition here
CTA-PB vs MBII Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.6B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.12, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check MBII's competition here