Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNV | $212.16 | -1.21% | 40.9B | 29.84 | $7.11 | +0.76% |
| NEM | $98.54 | -0.45% | 105.2B | 12.78 | $7.71 | +1.10% |
| AEM | $159.93 | -1.34% | 80.1B | 15.06 | $10.62 | +1.11% |
| B | $39.15 | -0.79% | 65.6B | 12.75 | $3.07 | +2.47% |
| WPM | $112.58 | -1.99% | 51.1B | 28.50 | $3.95 | +0.67% |
| AU | $84.43 | -0.05% | 42.7B | 12.08 | $6.99 | +5.86% |
| GFI | $35.49 | -1.09% | 31.8B | 9.01 | $3.94 | +5.27% |
| KGC | $25.27 | -2.28% | 30.2B | 10.75 | $2.35 | +0.61% |
| AGI | $35.00 | -2.43% | 14.7B | 13.94 | $2.51 | +0.35% |
| RGLD | $204.79 | -0.44% | 14.2B | 24.79 | $8.26 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
FNV vs NEM Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NEM trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NEM's competition here
FNV vs AEM Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while AEM trades at $159.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AEM's competition here
FNV vs B Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while B trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas B's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to B's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check B's competition here
FNV vs WPM Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while WPM trades at $112.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check WPM's competition here
FNV vs AU Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while AU trades at $84.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AU's competition here
FNV vs GFI Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while GFI trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GFI's competition here
FNV vs KGC Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while KGC trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KGC's competition here
FNV vs AGI Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while AGI trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AGI's competition here
FNV vs RGLD Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while RGLD trades at $204.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check RGLD's competition here
FNV vs CDE Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while CDE trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CDE's competition here
FNV vs HMY Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while HMY trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HMY's competition here
FNV vs IAG Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while IAG trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IAG's competition here
FNV vs EQX Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while EQX trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check EQX's competition here
FNV vs NGD Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NGD trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NGD's competition here
FNV vs SBSW Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while SBSW trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -21.31. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SBSW's competition here
FNV vs OR Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while OR trades at $33.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check OR's competition here
FNV vs EGO Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while EGO trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check EGO's competition here
FNV vs AUY Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AUY's competition here
FNV vs BTG Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while BTG trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BTG's competition here
FNV vs SSRM Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while SSRM trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SSRM's competition here
FNV vs FSAGX Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, FSAGX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while FSAGX trades at $52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas FSAGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to FSAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check FSAGX's competition here
FNV vs ARMN Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while ARMN trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 71.22. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ARMN's competition here
FNV vs ORLA Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while ORLA trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ORLA's competition here
FNV vs SAND Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SAND's competition here
FNV vs AAUC Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while AAUC trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -24.05. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AAUC's competition here
FNV vs NG Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NG trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NG's competition here
FNV vs CGAU Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while CGAU trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CGAU's competition here
FNV vs SA Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while SA trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -55.60. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check SA's competition here
FNV vs FSM Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while FSM trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to FSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check FSM's competition here
FNV vs HYMC Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while HYMC trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -24.60. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMC's competition here
FNV vs DRD Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while DRD trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DRD's competition here
FNV vs CNL Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while CNL trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CNL's competition here
FNV vs IAUX Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while IAUX trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IAUX's competition here
FNV vs DC Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 654.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while DC trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DC's competition here
FNV vs GAU Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 535.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while GAU trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GAU's competition here
FNV vs IDR Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 509.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while IDR trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check IDR's competition here
FNV vs NVAWW Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 506.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NVAWW trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NVAWW's competition here
FNV vs GSS Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GSS's competition here
FNV vs DC-WT Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check DC-WT's competition here
FNV vs THM Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 426.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while THM trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -206.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check THM's competition here
FNV vs KOR Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, KOR has a market cap of 415.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while KOR trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas KOR's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KOR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to KOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KOR's competition here
FNV vs CMCL Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while CMCL trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CMCL's competition here
FNV vs NFGC Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 365.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NFGC trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NFGC's competition here
FNV vs ODV Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while ODV trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ODV's competition here
FNV vs VGZ Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 316.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while VGZ trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -36.17. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check VGZ's competition here
FNV vs TRX Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while TRX trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check TRX's competition here
FNV vs USAU Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 243.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while USAU trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to USAU's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check USAU's competition here
FNV vs GLDG Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while GLDG trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GLDG's competition here
FNV vs CTGO Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while CTGO trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check CTGO's competition here
FNV vs MINE Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while MINE trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check MINE's competition here
FNV vs GORO Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while GORO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GORO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GORO's competition here
FNV vs GSV Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GSV's competition here
FNV vs NVA Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NVA trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NVA's competition here
FNV vs NAMM Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NAMM trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NAMM's competition here
FNV vs PZG Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while PZG trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check PZG's competition here
FNV vs BGL Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while BGL trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGL's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BGL's competition here
FNV vs AAU Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AAU's competition here
FNV vs AUST Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while AUST trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check AUST's competition here
FNV vs ODVWZ Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while ODVWZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ODVWZ's competition here
FNV vs ATCX Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while ATCX trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check ATCX's competition here
FNV vs NAMMW Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while NAMMW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check NAMMW's competition here
FNV vs BGLWW Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while BGLWW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check BGLWW's competition here
FNV vs HYMCZ Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCZ's competition here
FNV vs HYMCL Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCL's competition here
FNV vs HYMCW Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check HYMCW's competition here
FNV vs GPL Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check GPL's competition here
FNV vs KLDX Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, KLDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while KLDX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas KLDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KLDX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to KLDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KLDX's competition here
FNV vs KL Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check KL's competition here
FNV vs PVG Comparison June 2026
FNV plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNV stands at 40.9B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNV is priced at $212.16, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNV currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNV is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNV.Check PVG's competition here