Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FRD's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FRD and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRD | $36.00 | +1.41% | 259.2M | 9.36 | $3.84 | +0.43% |
| NUE | $244.97 | -0.29% | 55.6B | 15.70 | $15.60 | +0.91% |
| MT | $60.98 | +0.93% | 46.5B | 17.18 | $3.55 | +1.19% |
| STLD | $222.90 | +0.45% | 31.7B | 16.45 | $13.55 | +0.93% |
| RS | $417.00 | +0.71% | 21.2B | 19.09 | $21.85 | +1.18% |
| PKX | $48.90 | +0.62% | 14.8B | 28.88 | $1.69 | +3.17% |
| CRS | $278.31 | -0.20% | 13.8B | 24.04 | $11.58 | +0.29% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| TX | $49.16 | +1.07% | 9.7B | 13.81 | $3.56 | +4.47% |
| GGB | $4.38 | -0.23% | 8.6B | 15.65 | $0.28 | +3.42% |
Stock Comparison
Nucor Corporation (NYSE: NUE)
FRD vs NUE Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while NUE trades at $244.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check NUE's competition here
ArcelorMittal S.A. (NYSE: MT)
FRD vs MT Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while MT trades at $60.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MT's competition here
Steel Dynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ: STLD)
FRD vs STLD Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while STLD trades at $222.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check STLD's competition here
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (NYSE: RS)
FRD vs RS Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while RS trades at $417.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check RS's competition here
POSCO Holdings Inc. (NYSE: PKX)
FRD vs PKX Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while PKX trades at $48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check PKX's competition here
Carpenter Technology Corporation (NYSE: CRS)
FRD vs CRS Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while CRS trades at $278.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to CRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CRS's competition here
United States Steel Corporation (NYSE: X)
FRD vs X Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to X's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to X. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check X's competition here
Ternium S.A. (NYSE: TX)
FRD vs TX Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while TX trades at $49.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check TX's competition here
Gerdau S.A. (NYSE: GGB)
FRD vs GGB Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while GGB trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check GGB's competition here
Commercial Metals Company (NYSE: CMC)
FRD vs CMC Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while CMC trades at $62.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CMC's competition here
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE: CLF)
FRD vs CLF Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while CLF trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to CLF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CLF's competition here
Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V. (AMEX: SIM)
FRD vs SIM Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while SIM trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SIM's competition here
Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE: WS)
FRD vs WS Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while WS trades at $36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check WS's competition here
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (NYSE: SID)
FRD vs SID Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while SID trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SID's competition here
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCHN)
FRD vs SCHN Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SCHN's competition here
TimkenSteel Corporation (NYSE: TMST)
FRD vs TMST Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TMST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check TMST's competition here
Radius Recycling, Inc. (NASDAQ: RDUS)
FRD vs RDUS Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check RDUS's competition here
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (NYSE: SXC)
FRD vs SXC Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 831.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while SXC trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SXC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SXC's competition here
Metallus Inc. (NYSE: MTUS)
FRD vs MTUS Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while MTUS trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTUS's competition here
Algoma Steel Group Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTL)
FRD vs ASTL Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 569.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while ASTL trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ASTL's competition here
Olympic Steel, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZEUS)
FRD vs ZEUS Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ZEUS's competition here
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (NASDAQ: USAP)
FRD vs USAP Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check USAP's competition here
Hongli Group Inc. (NASDAQ: HLP)
FRD vs HLP Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 272.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while HLP trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 121.39. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check HLP's competition here
Mesabi Trust (NYSE: MSB)
FRD vs MSB Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while MSB trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MSB's competition here
Synalloy Corporation (NASDAQ: SYNL)
FRD vs SYNL Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SYNL's competition here
Luda Technology Group Limited (AMEX: LUD)
FRD vs LUD Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while LUD trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is 127.33. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LUD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to LUD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check LUD's competition here
ZK International Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZKIN)
FRD vs ZKIN Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while ZKIN trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ZKIN's competition here
Huadi International Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: HUDI)
FRD vs HUDI Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while HUDI trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check HUDI's competition here
Algoma Steel Group Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTLW)
FRD vs ASTLW Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 21.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while ASTLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ASTLW's competition here
Mechel PAO (NYSE: MTL-P)
FRD vs MTL-P Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTL-P's competition here
Mechel PAO (NYSE: MTL)
FRD vs MTL Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTL's competition here
Ossen Innovation Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: OSN)
FRD vs OSN Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check OSN's competition here
ArcelorMittal 5.50% Mandatorily (NYSE: MTCN)
FRD vs MTCN Comparison November 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MTCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $36.00 on the NASDAQ, while MTCN trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MTCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MTCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTCN's competition here