Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HROW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HROW | $38.43 | +16.10% | 1.2B | -88.05 | -$0.38 | N/A |
| TAK | $15.89 | +0.92% | 49.7B | 41.37 | $0.38 | +3.96% |
| HLN | $9.09 | +2.19% | 40.3B | 18.61 | $0.49 | +2.13% |
| TEVA | $34.35 | +3.28% | 40.1B | 25.71 | $1.34 | N/A |
| VTRS | $16.59 | +4.14% | 18.9B | -54.00 | -$0.30 | +3.04% |
| ITCI | $131.87 | +0.00% | 14B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| ELAN | $24.20 | +2.20% | 12.2B | -49.00 | -$0.50 | N/A |
| CTLT | $63.48 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| RDY | $13.39 | +1.17% | 11.1B | 24.76 | $0.54 | +0.69% |
| RGC | $19.85 | -7.20% | 10B | -2031.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HROW vs TAK Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TAK has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TAK trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TAK's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to TAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TAK's competition here
HROW vs HLN Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while HLN trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check HLN's competition here
HROW vs TEVA Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TEVA trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TEVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TEVA's competition here
HROW vs VTRS Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while VTRS trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check VTRS's competition here
HROW vs ITCI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ITCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ITCI's competition here
HROW vs ELAN Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ELAN trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ELAN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ELAN's competition here
HROW vs CTLT Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check CTLT's competition here
HROW vs RDY Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while RDY trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check RDY's competition here
HROW vs RGC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while RGC trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -2031.00. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RGC's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check RGC's competition here
HROW vs LNTH Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while LNTH trades at $103.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check LNTH's competition here
HROW vs INDV Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while INDV trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to INDV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check INDV's competition here
HROW vs AMRX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while AMRX trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check AMRX's competition here
HROW vs SUPN Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while SUPN trades at $45.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is -89.53. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SUPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check SUPN's competition here
HROW vs DCPH Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check DCPH's competition here
HROW vs AVDL Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while AVDL trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -1082.00. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check AVDL's competition here
HROW vs BHC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while BHC trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BHC's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check BHC's competition here
HROW vs EMBCV Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check EMBCV's competition here
HROW vs HCM Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while HCM trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check HCM's competition here
HROW vs ANIP Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ANIP trades at $82.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ANIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ANIP's competition here
HROW vs DVAX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while DVAX trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -41.89. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check DVAX's competition here
HROW vs TARO Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TARO's competition here
HROW vs PRGO Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while PRGO trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check PRGO's competition here
HROW vs ALVOW Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ALVOW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ALVOW's competition here
HROW vs PAHC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while PAHC trades at $31.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check PAHC's competition here
HROW vs ALVO Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ALVO trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALVO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ALVO's competition here
HROW vs COLL Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while COLL trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check COLL's competition here
HROW vs CRON Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while CRON trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is -139.50. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRON's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check CRON's competition here
HROW vs EVO Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 976.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while EVO trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check EVO's competition here
HROW vs PETQ Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check PETQ's competition here
HROW vs PCRX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 913M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while PCRX trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is 178.54. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PCRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check PCRX's competition here
HROW vs AMPH Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 888.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while AMPH trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check AMPH's competition here
HROW vs TLRY Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 618.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TLRY trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TLRY's competition here
HROW vs BDSI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check BDSI's competition here
HROW vs IRWD Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 530.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while IRWD trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IRWD's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check IRWD's competition here
HROW vs EOLS Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 441.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while EOLS trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EOLS's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check EOLS's competition here
HROW vs CGC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CGC has a market cap of 434.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while CGC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas CGC's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CGC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to CGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check CGC's competition here
HROW vs KMDA Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 417.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while KMDA trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check KMDA's competition here
HROW vs AQST Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while AQST trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check AQST's competition here
HROW vs SNDL Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 379.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while SNDL trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -48.67. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check SNDL's competition here
HROW vs ORGO Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ORGO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is -20.67. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ORGO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ORGO's competition here
HROW vs SIGA Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while SIGA trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check SIGA's competition here
HROW vs ALIM Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ALIM's competition here
HROW vs LNDC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LNDC's ROE of -9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check LNDC's competition here
HROW vs TKNO Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TKNO trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TKNO's competition here
HROW vs TYHT Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TYHT's competition here
HROW vs LFCR Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while LFCR trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check LFCR's competition here
HROW vs ACB Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 199.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ACB trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ACB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ACB's competition here
HROW vs EMBC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 196.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while EMBC trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW and EMBC have similar daily volatility (1.46).Check EMBC's competition here
HROW vs REPH Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check REPH's competition here
HROW vs DERM Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while DERM trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DERM's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check DERM's competition here
HROW vs THTX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while THTX trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -17.84. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check THTX's competition here
HROW vs OGI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while OGI trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check OGI's competition here
HROW vs ASRT Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ASRT trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ASRT's competition here
HROW vs CRDL Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while CRDL trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check CRDL's competition here
HROW vs SCTL Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check SCTL's competition here
HROW vs PROC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while PROC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check PROC's competition here
HROW vs OPTN Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while OPTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to OPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check OPTN's competition here
HROW vs ZOM Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZOM has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ZOM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ZOM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZOM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to ZOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ZOM's competition here
HROW vs GRVI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GRVI's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check GRVI's competition here
HROW vs CPIX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while CPIX trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check CPIX's competition here
HROW vs ZYNE Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ZYNE's competition here
HROW vs BGM Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while BGM trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check BGM's competition here
HROW vs SSIC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check SSIC's competition here
HROW vs VLNS Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check VLNS's competition here
HROW vs DRRX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while DRRX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DRRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check DRRX's competition here
HROW vs INCR Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while INCR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check INCR's competition here
HROW vs JUPW Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check JUPW's competition here
HROW vs ZYBT Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ZYBT trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ZYBT's competition here
HROW vs IXHL Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IXHL has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while IXHL trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas IXHL's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IXHL's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to IXHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check IXHL's competition here
HROW vs QLI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QLI has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while QLI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas QLI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to QLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to QLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check QLI's competition here
HROW vs HEXO Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check HEXO's competition here
HROW vs SCYX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while SCYX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check SCYX's competition here
HROW vs RMTI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while RMTI trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check RMTI's competition here
HROW vs CYTH Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CYTH's ROE of -7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to CYTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check CYTH's competition here
HROW vs TXMD Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TXMD trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is 188.00. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TXMD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TXMD's competition here
HROW vs EVOK Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EVOK has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while EVOK trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas EVOK's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EVOK's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to EVOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check EVOK's competition here
HROW vs AYTU Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while AYTU trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AYTU's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check AYTU's competition here
HROW vs QNTM Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while QNTM trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to QNTM's ROE of -6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check QNTM's competition here
HROW vs TLPH Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while TLPH trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check TLPH's competition here
HROW vs OPTH Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OPTH has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while OPTH trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas OPTH's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OPTH's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to OPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check OPTH's competition here
HROW vs ACRX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ACRX's competition here
HROW vs COSM Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while COSM trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check COSM's competition here
HROW vs BFRI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BFRI has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while BFRI trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas BFRI's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BFRI's ROE of -4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to BFRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check BFRI's competition here
HROW vs AGRX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check AGRX's competition here
HROW vs NLTX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check NLTX's competition here
HROW vs YCBD Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YCBD has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while YCBD trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas YCBD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to YCBD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to YCBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check YCBD's competition here
HROW vs LCI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check LCI's competition here
HROW vs ADMP Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADMP has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ADMP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ADMP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ADMP's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to ADMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ADMP's competition here
HROW vs MNK Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MNK has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while MNK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas MNK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MNK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to MNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check MNK's competition here
HROW vs GELS Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while GELS trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GELS's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check GELS's competition here
HROW vs FLGC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while FLGC trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check FLGC's competition here
HROW vs PLXP Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PLXP has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while PLXP trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas PLXP's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PLXP's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to PLXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check PLXP's competition here
HROW vs RDHL Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RDHL has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while RDHL trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas RDHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RDHL's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to RDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check RDHL's competition here
HROW vs ATNX Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATNX has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while ATNX trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas ATNX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ATNX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to ATNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check ATNX's competition here
HROW vs CPHI Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPHI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while CPHI trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas CPHI's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CPHI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to CPHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check CPHI's competition here
HROW vs PROCW Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PROCW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while PROCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas PROCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PROCW's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is more volatile compared to PROCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check PROCW's competition here
HROW vs SNOA Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SNOA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while SNOA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas SNOA's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SNOA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to SNOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check SNOA's competition here
HROW vs UPC Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UPC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while UPC trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas UPC's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to UPC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to UPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check UPC's competition here
HROW vs APUS Comparison June 2026
HROW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HROW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APUS has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HROW is priced at $38.43, while APUS trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HROW currently has a P/E ratio of -88.05, whereas APUS's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, HROW's ROE is -0.34%, compared to APUS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HROW is less volatile compared to APUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HROW.Check APUS's competition here