Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IIIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIIN | $28.56 | +2.09% | 549M | 13.02 | $2.17 | +4.03% |
| CRS | $566.42 | +13.49% | 26B | 55.25 | $9.48 | +0.15% |
| ATI | $200.14 | +11.10% | 25.5B | 61.76 | $3.03 | N/A |
| MLI | $137.46 | +3.15% | 15B | 17.76 | $7.64 | +0.91% |
| ESAB | $90.56 | +3.00% | 5.4B | 23.41 | $3.78 | +0.48% |
| AZZ | $152.62 | +11.02% | 4.3B | 13.73 | $10.50 | +0.57% |
| GPGI | $12.82 | +7.82% | 3.4B | -5.06 | -$2.31 | +0.05% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| WOR | $59.22 | +2.39% | 2.9B | 176.73 | $0.33 | +1.29% |
| CMPOW | $12.15 | +2.35% | 2.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.05% |
Stock Comparison
IIIN vs CRS Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while CRS trades at $566.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check CRS's competition here
IIIN vs ATI Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while ATI trades at $200.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 61.76. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check ATI's competition here
IIIN vs MLI Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while MLI trades at $137.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check MLI's competition here
IIIN vs ESAB Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while ESAB trades at $90.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check ESAB's competition here
IIIN vs AZZ Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while AZZ trades at $152.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check AZZ's competition here
IIIN vs GPGI Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, GPGI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while GPGI trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas GPGI's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPGI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to GPGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check GPGI's competition here
IIIN vs ARNC Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check ARNC's competition here
IIIN vs WOR Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while WOR trades at $59.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 176.73. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check WOR's competition here
IIIN vs CMPOW Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while CMPOW trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check CMPOW's competition here
IIIN vs CMPO Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while CMPO trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPO's ROE of -72.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check CMPO's competition here
IIIN vs NWPX Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while NWPX trades at $130.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check NWPX's competition here
IIIN vs HAYN Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check HAYN's competition here
IIIN vs RYI Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 746.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while RYI trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check RYI's competition here
IIIN vs CMPOV Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, CMPOV has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while CMPOV trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas CMPOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to CMPOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check CMPOV's competition here
IIIN vs MEC Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 712M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while MEC trades at $36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is -43.42. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MEC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check MEC's competition here
IIIN vs ELMT Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, ELMT has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while ELMT trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas ELMT's P/E ratio is -134.00. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to ELMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check ELMT's competition here
IIIN vs TG Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while TG trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check TG's competition here
IIIN vs AP Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 212.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while AP trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas AP's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AP's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check AP's competition here
IIIN vs GIFI Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while GIFI trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check GIFI's competition here
IIIN vs ZJK Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, ZJK has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while ZJK trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas ZJK's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZJK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to ZJK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check ZJK's competition here
IIIN vs TPCS Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while TPCS trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -30.25. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check TPCS's competition here
IIIN vs TRSG Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while TRSG trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is more volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check TRSG's competition here
IIIN vs SGBXV Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, SGBXV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while SGBXV trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas SGBXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGBXV's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to SGBXV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check SGBXV's competition here
IIIN vs OLOX Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, OLOX has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while OLOX trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas OLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OLOX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to OLOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check OLOX's competition here
IIIN vs HIHO Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while HIHO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check HIHO's competition here
IIIN vs SGBX Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 533.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while SGBX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGBX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check SGBX's competition here
IIIN vs AP-WT Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check AP-WT's competition here
IIIN vs LNKS Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 85.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while LNKS trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check LNKS's competition here
IIIN vs MTEN Comparison June 2026
IIIN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIIN stands at 549M. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 52K. Regarding current trading prices, IIIN is priced at $28.56, while MTEN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIIN currently has a P/E ratio of 13.02, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IIIN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIIN is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIIN.Check MTEN's competition here