Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IIPR-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIPR-PA | $23.85 | +0.42% | 47.8M | 4.94 | $4.83 | +13.07% |
| PLD | $147.52 | +3.32% | 137.5B | 37.07 | $3.98 | +2.81% |
| PSA | $322.86 | +3.79% | 56.7B | 33.32 | $9.69 | +3.71% |
| PSA-PR | $15.66 | -0.14% | 56.7B | 1.52 | $10.29 | +3.71% |
| PSA-PO | $15.15 | +0.00% | 56.7B | 1.47 | $10.29 | +3.71% |
| PSA-PG | $19.93 | -0.30% | 56.7B | 1.94 | $10.29 | +3.71% |
| PSA-PK | $18.55 | -0.03% | 46.9B | 1.80 | $10.29 | +3.71% |
| PSA-PH | $21.72 | +0.09% | 44.9B | 2.11 | $10.29 | +3.71% |
| EXR | $148.23 | +2.23% | 31.3B | 33.31 | $4.45 | +4.33% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | +3.29% |
Stock Comparison
IIPR-PA vs PLD Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PLD trades at $147.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PLD's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA trades at $322.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PR Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PR trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PO Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PO trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PO's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PG Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PG trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PG's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PK Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PK trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA and PSA-PK have similar daily volatility (0.84).Check PSA-PK's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PH Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PH trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PH's competition here
IIPR-PA vs EXR Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while EXR trades at $148.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check EXR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LSI Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LSI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs EGP Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while EGP trades at $202.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check EGP's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LINE Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while LINE trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -71.85. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LINE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs CUBE Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while CUBE trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check CUBE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs REXR-PB Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while REXR-PB trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check REXR-PB's competition here
IIPR-PA vs FR Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while FR trades at $62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check FR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs REXR Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while REXR trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check REXR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs STAG Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while STAG trades at $38.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check STAG's competition here
IIPR-PA vs TRNO Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while TRNO trades at $66.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check TRNO's competition here
IIPR-PA vs REXR-PC Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while REXR-PC trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check REXR-PC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs JAN Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while JAN trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -70.61. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check JAN's competition here
IIPR-PA vs COLD Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while COLD trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -38.18. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check COLD's competition here
IIPR-PA vs RCC Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while RCC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check RCC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs GRP-UN Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check GRP-UN's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PF Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PF's competition here
IIPR-PA vs NSA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while NSA trades at $45.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 60.25. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check NSA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PI Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PI trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PJ Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PL Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PL trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PL's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LXP Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while LXP trades at $52.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LXP's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PS Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PS trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PS's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PM Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PM trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PM's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PQ Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LXP-PC Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while LXP-PC trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LXP-PC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PN Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PN trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PN's competition here
IIPR-PA vs NSA-PA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while NSA-PA trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check NSA-PA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs NYMTI Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check NYMTI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs IIPR Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while IIPR trades at $60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check IIPR's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCF Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while SCCF trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SCCF's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCD Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while SCCD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SCCD's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCE Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while SCCE trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SCCE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PLYM Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PLYM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PLYM's competition here
IIPR-PA vs DHCNI Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 897.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while DHCNI trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check DHCNI's competition here
IIPR-PA vs ILPT Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 586M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while ILPT trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check ILPT's competition here
IIPR-PA vs TPTA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 550M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while TPTA trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check TPTA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PSA-PP Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 380.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PSA-PP trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PSA-PP's competition here
IIPR-PA vs TFSA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while TFSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check TFSA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs MDV Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while MDV trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -45.54. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check MDV's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PLYM-PA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs AJXA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check AJXA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SCCB Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCCB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SCCB's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SACC Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SACC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs LPA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while LPA trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check LPA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs SELF Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while SELF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check SELF's competition here
IIPR-PA vs PW-PA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while PW-PA trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check PW-PA's competition here
IIPR-PA vs MNR-PC Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check MNR-PC's competition here
IIPR-PA vs DRE Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check DRE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs QTS-PB Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check QTS-PB's competition here
IIPR-PA vs QTS Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check QTS's competition here
IIPR-PA vs CONE Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check CONE's competition here
IIPR-PA vs QTS-PA Comparison June 2026
IIPR-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IIPR-PA stands at 47.8M. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IIPR-PA is priced at $23.85, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IIPR-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, IIPR-PA's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IIPR-PA is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IIPR-PA.Check QTS-PA's competition here