Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRT | $16.92 | +1.50% | 4B | 84.60 | $0.20 | +4.00% |
| AVB | $186.85 | -0.41% | 26.5B | 23.15 | $8.07 | +3.77% |
| EQR | $67.86 | +0.77% | 25.4B | 27.14 | $2.50 | +4.11% |
| ESS | $284.78 | +0.99% | 18.3B | 32.07 | $8.88 | +3.62% |
| INVH | $29.80 | +1.43% | 17.7B | 31.37 | $0.95 | +3.97% |
| MAA-PI | $55.67 | +0.77% | 16.4B | 10.81 | $5.15 | +4.36% |
| MAA | $138.91 | +1.28% | 16.2B | 41.97 | $3.31 | +4.36% |
| SUI | $124.73 | +2.08% | 15.4B | -254.55 | -$0.49 | +6.51% |
| AMH-PG | $23.04 | -1.81% | 13B | 47.80 | $0.48 | +3.70% |
| AMH-PH | $23.88 | +0.04% | 12.9B | 49.54 | $0.48 | +3.70% |
Stock Comparison
IRT vs AVB Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AVB trades at $186.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AVB's competition here
IRT vs EQR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while EQR trades at $67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check EQR's competition here
IRT vs ESS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, ESS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while ESS trades at $284.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas ESS's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ESS's competition here
IRT vs INVH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while INVH trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check INVH's competition here
IRT vs MAA-PI Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while MAA-PI trades at $55.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA-PI's competition here
IRT vs MAA Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while MAA trades at $138.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 41.97. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA's competition here
IRT vs SUI Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while SUI trades at $124.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is -254.55. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUI's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PG Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AMH-PG trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 47.80. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PG's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AMH-PH trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PH's competition here
IRT vs UDR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while UDR trades at $39.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UDR's competition here
IRT vs ELS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while ELS trades at $63.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ELS's competition here
IRT vs AMH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AMH trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH's competition here
IRT vs CPT Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while CPT trades at $115.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CPT's competition here
IRT vs AIRC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIRC's competition here
IRT vs MRP Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while MRP trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MRP's competition here
IRT vs VRE Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while VRE trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check VRE's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PD Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while UMH-PD trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 112.56. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PD's competition here
IRT vs UMH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while UMH trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 152.70. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH's competition here
IRT vs CSR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, CSR has a market cap of 972.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while CSR trades at $57.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas CSR's P/E ratio is 123.13. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR's competition here
IRT vs CSR-PC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR-PC's competition here
IRT vs NXRT Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 737.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while NXRT trades at $29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -23.06. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check NXRT's competition here
IRT vs AIV Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AIV trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIV's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIV's competition here
IRT vs BRT Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 278M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while BRT trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -22.72. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRT's competition here
IRT vs SUNS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 115.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while SUNS trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUNS's competition here
IRT vs CLPR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while CLPR trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CLPR's competition here
IRT vs BHM Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while BHM trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BHM's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PD Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PD's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PC's competition here
IRT vs ACC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while ACC trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ACC's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PF Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PF's competition here
IRT vs PPS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, PPS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while PPS trades at $65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas PPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to PPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check PPS's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PC's competition here
IRT vs BRG Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while BRG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PE Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4B. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.92, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 84.60, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PE's competition here