Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 205.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $167.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.29. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check APH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 143B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $165.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check GLW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $325.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 67.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check COHR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $357.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 41.29. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check KEYS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $310.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check GRMN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $126.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FLEX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while CLS trades at $335.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 47.73. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check CLS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $679.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TDY's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check IIVI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $310.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MKSI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while FN trades at $570.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WDCVV's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TTMI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $57.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TRMB's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $330.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AEIS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $457.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 38.78. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LFUS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $210.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SANM's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $65.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 47.22. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check CGNX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $234.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 78.51. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VICR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check RAL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $305.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ESE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while RIOT trades at $19.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check RIOT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $267.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check PLXS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ST trades at $46.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ST's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $166.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 47.87. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check NOVT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $101.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ITRI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $88.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OLED's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $228.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OSIS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $242.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 33.88. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BELFA's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $290.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BELFB's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $38.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check KN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while PENG trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check PENG's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $81.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BHE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while INFQ trades at $12.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -61.24. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check INFQ's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $142.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 49.63. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ROG's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $69.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check NOVTU's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $63.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check CTS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 987.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check DAKT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 969.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $72.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 165.39. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VPG's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 952.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $15.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -89.24. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LPTH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FARO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 664.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SATLW trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SATLW's ROE of -34.65%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SATLW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 608.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MEI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AMOT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OUST-WT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 388.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OPTXW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 356.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $12.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SLNHP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 354.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $8.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -80.97. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OPTX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 315.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $88.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MPTI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VLDR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 297.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $20.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 65.61. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check RELL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 206.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SLNH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check EMAN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check USBC's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WRAP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $5.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LINK's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while WATT trades at $15.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WATT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while YIBO trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check YIBO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WBX's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WBX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ODYS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $8.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ELTK's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MVIS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check DSWL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 58.79. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ACFN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $4.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MIND's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $7.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 642.86. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LGL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MCRP trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MCRP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ISNS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while NSYS trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -52.65. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check NSYS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check DAIO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AMPGR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ELSE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TMPOW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while AVX trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AVX's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AVX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SGMA's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VIAO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check KNW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check REFR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check NEON's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WETH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while HOLOW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check HOLOW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MTEKW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MTEKW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OST's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SVREW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SVRE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check GAUZ's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AMPGZ's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BNSO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MINDP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MMAT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check IMTE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $5.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FCUV's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, EXYNW has a market cap of 887.5K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while EXYNW trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas EXYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EXYNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to EXYNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check EXYNW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 809.5K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SOBR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LGL-WT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, GMEX has a market cap of 180.3K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while GMEX trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas GMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GMEX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GMEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check GMEX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 38B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $363.10 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 30.28, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OUSTZ's competition here