Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LITE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITE | $918.46 | +2.58% | 63.9B | 144.17 | $5.70 | N/A |
| CSCO | $121.25 | -2.34% | 474.4B | 40.12 | $3.00 | +1.39% |
| NOK | $14.80 | +1.44% | 74.9B | 86.66 | $0.16 | +1.22% |
| MSI | $411.01 | +1.03% | 68.7B | 33.37 | $12.41 | +1.12% |
| CIEN | $447.98 | -4.00% | 62.2B | 146.94 | $2.99 | N/A |
| CRDO | $255.80 | +15.09% | 43.2B | 128.75 | $1.82 | N/A |
| ERIC | $12.28 | -1.92% | 39.4B | 14.83 | $0.80 | +2.70% |
| ASTS | $85.94 | -6.65% | 36.1B | -49.28 | -$1.80 | N/A |
| UI | $591.60 | +3.29% | 34.1B | 36.28 | $15.54 | +0.57% |
| SATS | $109.74 | -5.90% | 33.7B | -2.32 | -$50.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LITE vs CSCO Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 474.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CSCO trades at $121.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CSCO's competition here
LITE vs NOK Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while NOK trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 86.66. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check NOK's competition here
LITE vs MSI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MSI trades at $411.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MSI's competition here
LITE vs CIEN Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CIEN trades at $447.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 146.94. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CIEN's competition here
LITE vs CRDO Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CRDO trades at $255.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 128.75. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CRDO's competition here
LITE vs ERIC Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ERIC trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ERIC's competition here
LITE vs ASTS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ASTS trades at $85.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -49.28. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ASTS's competition here
LITE vs UI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while UI trades at $591.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 36.28. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check UI's competition here
LITE vs SATS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SATS trades at $109.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SATS's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SATS's competition here
LITE vs JNPR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check JNPR's competition here
LITE vs VIAV Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while VIAV trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is -185.72. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check VIAV's competition here
LITE vs ZBRA Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ZBRA trades at $226.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ZBRA's competition here
LITE vs VSAT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while VSAT trades at $69.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -255.76. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check VSAT's competition here
LITE vs ONDS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ONDS trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is 107.22. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ONDS's competition here
LITE vs BDC Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while BDC trades at $115.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check BDC's competition here
LITE vs MAXR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MAXR's competition here
LITE vs COMM Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check COMM's competition here
LITE vs EXTR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while EXTR trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 239.42. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check EXTR's competition here
LITE vs YSS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, YSS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while YSS trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas YSS's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to YSS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to YSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check YSS's competition here
LITE vs KN Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while KN trades at $39.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 53.82. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check KN's competition here
LITE vs VISN Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while VISN trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check VISN's competition here
LITE vs DGII Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while DGII trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check DGII's competition here
LITE vs INFN Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check INFN's competition here
LITE vs HLIT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while HLIT trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 167.63. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check HLIT's competition here
LITE vs ITRN Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ITRN trades at $66.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ITRN's competition here
LITE vs SWIR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SWIR's competition here
LITE vs ADTN Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ADTN trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -36.56. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ADTN's competition here
LITE vs GILT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 879.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while GILT trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check GILT's competition here
LITE vs POLY Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check POLY's competition here
LITE vs FEIM Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 658.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while FEIM trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 91.70. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check FEIM's competition here
LITE vs TSAT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 658.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while TSAT trades at $46.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check TSAT's competition here
LITE vs NTGR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 648.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while NTGR trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is -27.13. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check NTGR's competition here
LITE vs CLFD Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 535M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CLFD trades at $40.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 171.17. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CLFD's competition here
LITE vs AIOT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while AIOT trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check AIOT's competition here
LITE vs PWFL Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check PWFL's competition here
LITE vs ITI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ITI's competition here
LITE vs BKTI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 299.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while BKTI trades at $85.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check BKTI's competition here
LITE vs CRNT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 261.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CRNT trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is -145.50. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CRNT's competition here
LITE vs SATX Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SATX's competition here
LITE vs LTRX Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 253.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while LTRX trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -39.81. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check LTRX's competition here
LITE vs SILC Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 247.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SILC trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SILC's competition here
LITE vs AVNW Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 243.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while AVNW trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check AVNW's competition here
LITE vs AUDC Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while AUDC trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check AUDC's competition here
LITE vs OCC Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while OCC trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is 175.08. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check OCC's competition here
LITE vs INSG Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while INSG trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check INSG's competition here
LITE vs KVHI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while KVHI trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check KVHI's competition here
LITE vs AMPG Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 143.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while AMPG trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check AMPG's competition here
LITE vs PCTI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check PCTI's competition here
LITE vs CMTL Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CMTL trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CMTL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CMTL's competition here
LITE vs AIRG Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while AIRG trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check AIRG's competition here
LITE vs TESS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check TESS's competition here
LITE vs JCS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check JCS's competition here
LITE vs MOB Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MOB trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MOB's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MOB's competition here
LITE vs WTT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check WTT's competition here
LITE vs SYTA Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SYTA's competition here
LITE vs FKWL Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while FKWL trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -46.33. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check FKWL's competition here
LITE vs MOBBW Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MOBBW trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MOBBW's competition here
LITE vs BOSC Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while BOSC trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check BOSC's competition here
LITE vs UTSI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while UTSI trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check UTSI's competition here
LITE vs FIEE Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while FIEE trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check FIEE's competition here
LITE vs MINM Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MINM's competition here
LITE vs IOTR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while IOTR trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check IOTR's competition here
LITE vs SYNX Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SYNX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SYNX's competition here
LITE vs MITQ Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MITQ trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -31.46. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MITQ's competition here
LITE vs CLRO Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CLRO trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CLRO's competition here
LITE vs SONM Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SONM trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SONM's competition here
LITE vs CMBM Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CMBM's competition here
LITE vs CASA Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CASA's competition here
LITE vs MYNA Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MYNA's competition here
LITE vs AMPGW Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check AMPGW's competition here
LITE vs ASNS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 82K. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ASNS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ASNS's competition here
LITE vs SYTAW Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SYTAW's competition here
LITE vs OCLR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check OCLR's competition here
LITE vs NMRX Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check NMRX's competition here
LITE vs MITL Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check MITL's competition here
LITE vs BDR Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check BDR's competition here
LITE vs ZXZZT Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ZXZZT trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ZXZZT's competition here
LITE vs PLCM Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check PLCM's competition here
LITE vs RKUS Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check RKUS's competition here
LITE vs GIMO Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check GIMO's competition here
LITE vs BRCD Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check BRCD's competition here
LITE vs SSNI Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SSNI's competition here
LITE vs ORBC Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check ORBC's competition here
LITE vs VCRA Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check VCRA's competition here
LITE vs XXIA Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check XXIA's competition here
LITE vs CALL Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while CALL trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to CALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check CALL's competition here
LITE vs SATX-WTA Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
LITE vs EXFO Comparison June 2026
LITE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LITE stands at 63.9B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LITE is priced at $918.46, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LITE currently has a P/E ratio of 144.17, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, LITE's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LITE is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LITE.Check EXFO's competition here