Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See LMRKN's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for LMRKN and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMRKN | $25.50 | +0.00% | 0 | 5.54 | $4.60 | +4.85% |
| BPYPN | $13.56 | -0.22% | 94.1B | -20.53 | -$0.66 | +0.64% |
| CBRE | $134.58 | -2.60% | 38.8B | 17.95 | $7.51 | N/A |
| BEKE | $17.96 | -0.80% | 20.9B | 21.14 | $0.85 | +1.54% |
| JLL | $372.14 | -0.60% | 17B | 15.40 | $24.16 | N/A |
| CSGP | $30.27 | -0.20% | 12.2B | 32.20 | $0.94 | N/A |
| COMP | $10.26 | +2.70% | 7.8B | 171.08 | $0.06 | N/A |
| BPYPO | $14.70 | -0.94% | 6.6B | -22.27 | -$0.66 | +0.64% |
| FSV | $155.94 | +0.61% | 6.5B | 26.93 | $5.79 | +0.77% |
| BPYPP | $15.12 | -1.39% | 6.4B | -22.97 | -$0.66 | +0.64% |
Stock Comparison
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: BPYPN)
LMRKN vs BPYPN Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while BPYPN trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is -20.53. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check BPYPN's competition here
CBRE Group, Inc. (NYSE: CBRE)
LMRKN vs CBRE Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CBRE trades at $134.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CBRE's competition here
KE Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BEKE)
LMRKN vs BEKE Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while BEKE trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check BEKE's competition here
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (NYSE: JLL)
LMRKN vs JLL Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while JLL trades at $372.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check JLL's competition here
CoStar Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSGP)
LMRKN vs CSGP Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CSGP trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CSGP's competition here
Compass, Inc. (NYSE: COMP)
LMRKN vs COMP Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while COMP trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 171.08. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check COMP's competition here
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: BPYPO)
LMRKN vs BPYPO Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while BPYPO trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is -22.27. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check BPYPO's competition here
FirstService Corporation (NASDAQ: FSV)
LMRKN vs FSV Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while FSV trades at $155.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check FSV's competition here
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: BPYPP)
LMRKN vs BPYPP Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while BPYPP trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check BPYPP's competition here
Colliers International Group Inc. (NASDAQ: CIGI)
LMRKN vs CIGI Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CIGI trades at $91.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CIGI's competition here
Cushman & Wakefield plc (NYSE: CWK)
LMRKN vs CWK Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CWK trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CWK's competition here
Tricon Residential Inc. (NYSE: TCN)
LMRKN vs TCN Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check TCN's competition here
IHS Holding Limited (NYSE: IHS)
LMRKN vs IHS Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while IHS trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check IHS's competition here
Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (NYSE: HOUS)
LMRKN vs HOUS Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while HOUS trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOUS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check HOUS's competition here
Newmark Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NMRK)
LMRKN vs NMRK Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while NMRK trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check NMRK's competition here
Redfin Corporation (NASDAQ: RDFN)
LMRKN vs RDFN Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +8.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check RDFN's competition here
Realogy Holdings Corp. (NYSE: RLGY)
LMRKN vs RLGY Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RLGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check RLGY's competition here
Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: OPEN)
LMRKN vs OPEN Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while OPEN trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check OPEN's competition here
PropertyGuru Limited (NYSE: PGRU)
LMRKN vs PGRU Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check PGRU's competition here
Hotel101 Global Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: HBNB)
LMRKN vs HBNB Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, HBNB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while HBNB trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas HBNB's P/E ratio is -33.46. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBNB's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to HBNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check HBNB's competition here
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (NYSE: MMI)
LMRKN vs MMI Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 941.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while MMI trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is 67.19. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check MMI's competition here
eXp World Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPI)
LMRKN vs EXPI Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 753.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while EXPI trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -33.79. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check EXPI's competition here
INDUS Realty Trust, Inc. (NASDAQ: INDT)
LMRKN vs INDT Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check INDT's competition here
FLJ Group Limited (NASDAQ: QK)
LMRKN vs QK Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check QK's competition here
AGNT, Inc. (NASDAQ: AGNT)
LMRKN vs AGNT Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, AGNT has a market cap of 468.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while AGNT trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas AGNT's P/E ratio is -256.77. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGNT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to AGNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check AGNT's competition here
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (NYSE: TCI)
LMRKN vs TCI Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 429.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while TCI trades at $48.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is -4897.50. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check TCI's competition here
The Real Brokerage Inc. (NASDAQ: REAX)
LMRKN vs REAX Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while REAX trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -156.58. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check REAX's competition here
FRP Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: FRPH)
LMRKN vs FRPH Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while FRPH trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 945.00. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRPH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check FRPH's competition here
American Realty Investors, Inc. (NYSE: ARL)
LMRKN vs ARL Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, ARL has a market cap of 357M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while ARL trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas ARL's P/E ratio is 368.33. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to ARL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check ARL's competition here
Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (NYSE: SEG)
LMRKN vs SEG Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while SEG trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check SEG's competition here
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RMAX)
LMRKN vs RMAX Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while RMAX trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMAX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check RMAX's competition here
FLJ Group Limited (NASDAQ: FLJ)
LMRKN vs FLJ Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check FLJ's competition here
The RMR Group Inc. (NASDAQ: RMR)
LMRKN vs RMR Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while RMR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check RMR's competition here
Cian PLC (NYSE: CIAN)
LMRKN vs CIAN Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CIAN's competition here
Offerpad Solutions Inc. (NYSE: OPAD-WT)
LMRKN vs OPAD-WT Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHCI)
LMRKN vs CHCI Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CHCI has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CHCI trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CHCI's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to CHCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CHCI's competition here
Douglas Elliman Inc. (NYSE: DOUG)
LMRKN vs DOUG Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 158.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while DOUG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOUG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check DOUG's competition here
Star Holdings (NASDAQ: STHO)
LMRKN vs STHO Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while STHO trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check STHO's competition here
Doma Holdings Inc. (NYSE: DOMA)
LMRKN vs DOMA Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOMA's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check DOMA's competition here
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (NASDAQ: ASPS)
LMRKN vs ASPS Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while ASPS trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check ASPS's competition here
Rafael Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RFL)
LMRKN vs RFL Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while RFL trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check RFL's competition here
WeWork Inc. (NYSE: WE)
LMRKN vs WE Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check WE's competition here
LuxUrban Hotels Inc. (NASDAQ: CHG)
LMRKN vs CHG Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHG's ROE of +39.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CHG's competition here
Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: DUO)
LMRKN vs DUO Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while DUO trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check DUO's competition here
Leju Holdings Limited (NYSE: LEJU)
LMRKN vs LEJU Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check LEJU's competition here
Linkhome Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LHAI)
LMRKN vs LHAI Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, LHAI has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while LHAI trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas LHAI's P/E ratio is -76.20. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LHAI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to LHAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check LHAI's competition here
TDH Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PETZ)
LMRKN vs PETZ Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while PETZ trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check PETZ's competition here
Offerpad Solutions Inc. (NASDAQ: OPAD)
LMRKN vs OPAD Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while OPAD trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check OPAD's competition here
Gyrodyne, LLC (NASDAQ: GYRO)
LMRKN vs GYRO Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while GYRO trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check GYRO's competition here
Avalon GloboCare Corp. (NASDAQ: AVCO)
LMRKN vs AVCO Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check AVCO's competition here
Fathom Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: FTHM)
LMRKN vs FTHM Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while FTHM trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check FTHM's competition here
Ohmyhome Limited (NASDAQ: OMH)
LMRKN vs OMH Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while OMH trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMH's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check OMH's competition here
New Concept Energy, Inc. (AMEX: GBR)
LMRKN vs GBR Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while GBR trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check GBR's competition here
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (NASDAQ: ASPSW)
LMRKN vs ASPSW Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, ASPSW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while ASPSW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas ASPSW's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASPSW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to ASPSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check ASPSW's competition here
MDJM Ltd (NASDAQ: MDJH)
LMRKN vs MDJH Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check MDJH's competition here
Appreciate Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFR)
LMRKN vs SFR Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check SFR's competition here
Appreciate Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFRWW)
LMRKN vs SFRWW Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check SFRWW's competition here
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (NASDAQ: ASPSZ)
LMRKN vs ASPSZ Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, ASPSZ has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while ASPSZ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas ASPSZ's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASPSZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to ASPSZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check ASPSZ's competition here
MDJM Ltd (NASDAQ: UOKA)
LMRKN vs UOKA Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 604.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while UOKA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check UOKA's competition here
La Rosa Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: LRHC)
LMRKN vs LRHC Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 431.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while LRHC trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +6.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check LRHC's competition here
Ucommune International Ltd (NASDAQ: UK)
LMRKN vs UK Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 298.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while UK trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check UK's competition here
Ucommune International Ltd (NASDAQ: UKOMW)
LMRKN vs UKOMW Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 186.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while UKOMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check UKOMW's competition here
Radar Company (NASDAQ: RDCO)
LMRKN vs RDCO Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, RDCO has a market cap of 36.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while RDCO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas RDCO's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDCO's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to RDCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check RDCO's competition here
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKP)
LMRKN vs LMRKP Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check LMRKP's competition here
Nam Tai Property Inc. (NYSE: NTP)
LMRKN vs NTP Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check NTP's competition here
IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A. (NASDAQ: IRCP)
LMRKN vs IRCP Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check IRCP's competition here
Optibase Ltd. (NASDAQ: OBAS)
LMRKN vs OBAS Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check OBAS's competition here
WeWork Inc. (NYSE: WE-WT)
LMRKN vs WE-WT Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, WE-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while WE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas WE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WE-WT's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to WE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check WE-WT's competition here
Doma Holdings Inc. (NYSE: DOMA-WT)
LMRKN vs DOMA-WT Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, DOMA-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while DOMA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas DOMA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOMA-WT's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to DOMA-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check DOMA-WT's competition here
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: BPY)
LMRKN vs BPY Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check BPY's competition here
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRK)
LMRKN vs LMRK Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check LMRK's competition here
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKO)
LMRKN vs LMRKO Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check LMRKO's competition here
IFM Investments Ltd. (NYSE: CTC)
LMRKN vs CTC Comparison November 2026
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP (NASDAQ: LMRKN) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMRKN stands at 0. In comparison, CTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMRKN is priced at $25.50 on the NASDAQ, while CTC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMRKN currently has a P/E ratio of 5.54, whereas CTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMRKN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LMRKN is more volatile compared to CTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMRKN.Check CTC's competition here