Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while KHC trades at $24.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check KHC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while JBS trades at $12.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check JBS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while GIS trades at $33.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check GIS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while HRL trades at $24.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HRL's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MKC-V trades at $48.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MKC-V's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MKC trades at $48.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MKC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SJM trades at $115.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SJM's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MICC trades at $17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MICC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while DAR trades at $57.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check DAR's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while PPC trades at $29.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PPC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while CPB trades at $22.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CPB's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while INGR trades at $100.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check INGR's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while CAG trades at $13.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -131.40. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CAG's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BRFS trades at $3.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRFS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while LANC trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LANC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while TWNK trades at $33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check TWNK's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check TWNKW's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while POST trades at $92.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check POST's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MZTI trades at $109.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MZTI's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while CENT trades at $42.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CENT's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while FRPT trades at $53.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FRPT's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SOVO trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SOVO's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while CENTA trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CENTA's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while KLG trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check KLG's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while FLO trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FLO's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while NOMD trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NOMD's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while JJSF trades at $79.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check JJSF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while THS trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check THS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while HLF trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HLF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SMPL trades at $12.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SMPL's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SENEB trades at $155.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SENEB's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SENEA trades at $156.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SENEA's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 980.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BRBR trades at $8.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRBR's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while JBSS trades at $78.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check JBSS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 778.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while WEST trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check WEST's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while STKL trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check STKL's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 610M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while UTZ trades at $7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is -68.90. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check UTZ's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while THRN trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check THRN's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 549.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MAMA trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 90.07. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MAMA's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 388.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BRCC trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRCC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while LWAY trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LWAY's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 355.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BYND trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BYND's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 354.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while NATR trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NATR's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while USNA trades at $20.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check USNA's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 313.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BGS trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BGS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while FREE trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FREE's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while WESTW trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check WESTW's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MMMB trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MMMB's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while LFVN trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LFVN's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while PLIN trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PLIN's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while OFRM trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -46.17. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check OFRM's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while FTLF trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FTLF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BRID trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRID's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while HAIN trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HAIN's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MITC trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MITC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BOF trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BOF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while WYHG trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check WYHG's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while LSF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LSF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BRLS trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRLS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while CLXT trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check CLXT's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while HAPP trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HAPP's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while FARM trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FARM's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while DDC trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check DDC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while JVA trades at $4.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check JVA's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while YGF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check YGF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while ORIS trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ORIS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while COOT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check COOT's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while NAII trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NAII's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MWYN trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MWYN's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while TTCF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check TTCF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while PLAG trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PLAG's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while PETZ trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PETZ's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BON trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BON's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while NUZE trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NUZE's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while ABVE trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ABVE's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while ABVEW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ABVEW's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BTTR trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BTTR's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while HCWC trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check HCWC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while ATPC trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check ATPC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while FREEW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FREEW's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while RGF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check RGF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while NCRA trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check NCRA's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while IMG trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check IMG's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while FAMI trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check FAMI's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BRLSW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRLSW's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SOWG trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SOWG's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 95.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while STKH trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check STKH's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 56.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while PAVS trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PAVS's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SNAXW's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while SAFM trades at $204.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check SAFM's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, MJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while MJN trades at $89.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas MJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MJN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to MJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check MJN's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while VGFC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check VGFC's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while LNCE trades at $49.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check LNCE's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while PF trades at $66.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is more volatile compared to PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check PF's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while BRCN trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check BRCN's competition here

LW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LW stands at 6B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LW is priced at $45.59, while DTEA trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.45, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LW's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LW is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LW.Check DTEA's competition here