Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while DIS trades at $116.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to DIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check DIS's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while WBD trades at $30.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -24.37. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to WBD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check WBD's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LYV trades at $175.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is -155.05. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LYV's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LYV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LYV's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while FOXA trades at $66.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check FOXA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while FWONK trades at $106.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 97.55. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FWONK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check FWONK's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while FOX trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to FOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check FOX's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while FWONA trades at $101.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 93.05. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FWONA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check FWONA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ROKU trades at $160.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is 68.62. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ROKU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ROKU's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while VIAC trades at $29.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VIAC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check VIAC's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while WMG trades at $31.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to WMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check WMG's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while TKO trades at $191.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 66.32. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to TKO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check TKO's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, PSKY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while PSKY trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PSKY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PSKY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to PSKY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check PSKY's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LLYVA trades at $102.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LLYVA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LLYVK trades at $106.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LLYVK's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while EDR trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check EDR's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MSGS trades at $384.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is -436.81. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MSGS's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, SKYD has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while SKYD trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SKYD's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SKYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to SKYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check SKYD's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while PARAP trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check PARAP's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while WWE trades at $100.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check WWE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while PARAA trades at $16.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is 563.67. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check PARAA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, VSNTV has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while VSNTV trades at $46.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VSNTV's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VSNTV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to VSNTV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check VSNTV's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, VSNT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while VSNT trades at $33.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VSNT's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VSNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to VSNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check VSNT's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CNK trades at $38.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CNK's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while SPHR trades at $120.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -42.26. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check SPHR's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MANU trades at $22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is 2261.00. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to MANU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MANU's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MSGE trades at $77.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MSGE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MSGE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while BATRA trades at $55.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -87.97. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check BATRA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while BATRK trades at $50.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -80.17. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check BATRK's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while AMC trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to AMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check AMC's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while IMAX trades at $47.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check IMAX's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MSGR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MSGR trades at $240.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MSGR's P/E ratio is -124.77. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MSGR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to MSGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MSGR's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while APE trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check APE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LGF-B's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LGF-A's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while BOWL trades at $11.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check BOWL's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 922.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while IQ trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to IQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to IQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check IQ's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 830.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MCS trades at $26.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is 333.88. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MCS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to MCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MCS's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 673.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while RSVR trades at $10.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 79.39. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check RSVR's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ANGX has a market cap of 632.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ANGX trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ANGX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ANGX's ROE of +8.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ANGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ANGX's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 494.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while HUYA trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check HUYA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, STRZ has a market cap of 425.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while STRZ trades at $24.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas STRZ's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to STRZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to STRZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check STRZ's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while AMCX trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check AMCX's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LIVX trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LIVX's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LIVX's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while GNUS trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check GNUS's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while BREA trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BREA's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check BREA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while RDI trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RDI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check RDI's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CIDM trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CIDM's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LFS has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LFS trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LFS's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LFS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LFS's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CNVS trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CNVS's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while RDIB trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RDIB's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check RDIB's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while KUKE trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check KUKE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CPOP trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CPOP's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while GAIA trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check GAIA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ANGH trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ANGH's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while TOON trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TOON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check TOON's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MMV trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to MMV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MMV's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, TGE has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while TGE trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TGE's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to TGE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check TGE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CSCW trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CSCW's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ANGHW's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, KWM has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while KWM trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas KWM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KWM's ROE of +20705.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to KWM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check KWM's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, FTRK has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while FTRK trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FTRK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTRK's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to FTRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check FTRK's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CSSE trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CSSE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CSSEL's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CSSEP's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CSSEN's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while NIPG trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check NIPG's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ADD trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ADD's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ADD's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 596.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while RSVRW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check RSVRW's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, KUST has a market cap of 389.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while KUST trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas KUST's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KUST's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to KUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check KUST's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ZNB has a market cap of 264.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ZNB trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ZNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ZNB's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ZNB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ZNB's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MPU has a market cap of 148.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MPU trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MPU's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MPU's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to MPU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MPU's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check HOFVW's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, SONGD has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while SONGD trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SONGD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SONGD's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to SONGD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check SONGD's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CKEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CKEC trades at $33.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CKEC's P/E ratio is 97.26. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CKEC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to CKEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CKEC's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while VIACP trades at $52.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check VIACP's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while VIACA trades at $32.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check VIACA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while EMWP trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check EMWP's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LVOPP trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is not fully comparable compared to LVOPP. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LVOPP's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, TUBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while TUBE trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TUBE's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TUBE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to TUBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check TUBE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while DISCK trades at $24.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check DISCK's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, RLJE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while RLJE trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RLJE's P/E ratio is -11.95. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RLJE's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to RLJE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check RLJE's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while HMTV trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check HMTV's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ADRA-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ADRA-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ADRA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ADRA-WT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ADRA-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ADRA-WT's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check RDBXW's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while RDBX trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +3.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check RDBX's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, SBSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while SBSA trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SBSA's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SBSA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to SBSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check SBSA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while MSGN trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check MSGN's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, DWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while DWA trades at $40.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DWA's P/E ratio is 55.28. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DWA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to DWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check DWA's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while ESGC trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ESGC's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check ESGC's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, LGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while LGF trades at $26.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LGF's P/E ratio is -24.12. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LGF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to LGF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check LGF's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CVC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CVC trades at $34.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CVC's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CVC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to CVC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CVC's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, CEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while CEC trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is more volatile compared to CEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check CEC's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while DISCB trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check DISCB's competition here

Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NFLX stands at 264B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NFLX is priced at $63.41 on the NASDAQ, while AESE trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NFLX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, NFLX's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NFLX is less volatile compared to AESE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NFLX.Check AESE's competition here