Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLOP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLOP | $11.60 | -0.43% | 171.8M | -1.42 | -$8.15 | +192.67% |
| BXP | $64.70 | +2.60% | 10.3B | 32.51 | $1.99 | +4.76% |
| ARE | $51.03 | +3.70% | 8.9B | -8.14 | -$6.27 | +8.00% |
| VNO-PM | $17.81 | +0.06% | 7.2B | 27.66 | $0.64 | +1.96% |
| VNO-PN | $17.64 | +0.51% | 7.2B | 27.39 | $0.64 | +1.96% |
| VNO-PL | $17.88 | +0.34% | 7.1B | 27.76 | $0.64 | +1.96% |
| VNO | $37.81 | +3.70% | 7.1B | 10.36 | $3.65 | +1.96% |
| VNO-PO | $15.01 | +0.21% | 7.1B | 23.31 | $0.64 | +1.96% |
| HPP-PC | $14.85 | -0.07% | 5.6B | -119.76 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| CUZ | $28.28 | +2.06% | 4.7B | -942.67 | -$0.03 | +4.53% |
Stock Comparison
NLOP vs BXP Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while BXP trades at $64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check BXP's competition here
NLOP vs ARE Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while ARE trades at $51.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ARE's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PM Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while VNO-PM trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PM's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PN Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while VNO-PN trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PN's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PL Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while VNO-PL trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PL's competition here
NLOP vs VNO Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while VNO trades at $37.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO's competition here
NLOP vs VNO-PO Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while VNO-PO trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check VNO-PO's competition here
NLOP vs HPP-PC Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while HPP-PC trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -119.76. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HPP-PC's competition here
NLOP vs CUZ Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CUZ trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is -942.67. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CUZ's competition here
NLOP vs KRC Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, KRC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while KRC trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas KRC's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to KRC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to KRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check KRC's competition here
NLOP vs SLG-PI Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while SLG-PI trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check SLG-PI's competition here
NLOP vs CDP Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CDP trades at $33.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CDP's competition here
NLOP vs SLG Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while SLG trades at $50.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check SLG's competition here
NLOP vs HIW Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while HIW trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HIW's competition here
NLOP vs DEI Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while DEI trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is -68.88. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DEI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DEI's competition here
NLOP vs CLI Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CLI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CLI's competition here
NLOP vs WRE Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check WRE's competition here
NLOP vs OGCP Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while OGCP trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OGCP's competition here
NLOP vs PGRE Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PGRE's competition here
NLOP vs FISK Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while FISK trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check FISK's competition here
NLOP vs ESBA Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while ESBA trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ESBA's competition here
NLOP vs PDM Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while PDM trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PDM's competition here
NLOP vs DEA Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while DEA trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 105.27. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DEA's competition here
NLOP vs JBGS Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 824.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while JBGS trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check JBGS's competition here
NLOP vs PSTL Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 800.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while PSTL trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 43.83. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PSTL's competition here
NLOP vs HPP Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 793M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while HPP trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check HPP's competition here
NLOP vs CXP Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CXP's competition here
NLOP vs BDN Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 536.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while BDN trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check BDN's competition here
NLOP vs CIO-PA Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CIO-PA's competition here
NLOP vs CIO Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CIO's competition here
NLOP vs OPINL Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OPINL's competition here
NLOP vs ELME Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while ELME trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ELME's competition here
NLOP vs EQC Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EQC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check EQC's competition here
NLOP vs ONL Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while ONL trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check ONL's competition here
NLOP vs FSP Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while FSP trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check FSP's competition here
NLOP vs NYC Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while NYC trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check NYC's competition here
NLOP vs OPI Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OPI's competition here
NLOP vs EQC-PD Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check EQC-PD's competition here
NLOP vs CMCT Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 31.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CMCT trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CMCT's competition here
NLOP vs PKY Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, PKY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while PKY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to PKY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to PKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check PKY's competition here
NLOP vs CMCTP Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check CMCTP's competition here
NLOP vs OFC Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check OFC's competition here
NLOP vs DTLA-P Comparison June 2026
NLOP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLOP stands at 171.8M. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NLOP is priced at $11.60, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLOP currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLOP's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NLOP is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLOP.Check DTLA-P's competition here