Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTRS | $170.60 | +0.88% | 31.6B | 17.86 | $9.55 | +1.93% |
| JPM | $312.70 | +0.51% | 837.9B | 14.96 | $20.90 | +1.91% |
| JPM-PC | $25.21 | -0.16% | 795.7B | 1.87 | $13.48 | +1.91% |
| JPM-PD | $23.79 | +0.08% | 765.7B | 1.76 | $13.48 | +1.91% |
| BAC-PL | $1,222.00 | +0.24% | 453.1B | 347.75 | $3.51 | +2.05% |
| BAC | $54.42 | +1.47% | 386.2B | 13.50 | $4.03 | +2.05% |
| BAC-PB | $24.83 | +0.04% | 346.8B | 7.07 | $3.51 | +2.05% |
| BAC-PK | $24.27 | -0.12% | 343.5B | 6.91 | $3.51 | +2.05% |
| BML-PL | $19.56 | +0.20% | 331.4B | 5.57 | $3.51 | +2.05% |
| BML-PH | $19.26 | +0.01% | 324B | 5.48 | $3.51 | +2.05% |
Stock Comparison
NTRS vs JPM Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 837.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while JPM trades at $312.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check JPM's competition here
NTRS vs JPM-PC Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 795.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while JPM-PC trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check JPM-PC's competition here
NTRS vs JPM-PD Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 765.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while JPM-PD trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check JPM-PD's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PL Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 453.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PL trades at $1,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 347.75. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PL's competition here
NTRS vs BAC Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 386.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC trades at $54.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PB Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 346.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PB trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PB's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PK Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 343.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PK trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PK's competition here
NTRS vs BML-PL Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 331.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BML-PL trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BML-PL's competition here
NTRS vs BML-PH Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 324B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BML-PH trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BML-PH's competition here
NTRS vs BML-PJ Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 321.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BML-PJ trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BML-PJ's competition here
NTRS vs BML-PG Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 319.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BML-PG trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BML-PG's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PE Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 309.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PE trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PE's competition here
NTRS vs HSBC Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 307B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while HSBC trades at $89.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check HSBC's competition here
NTRS vs RY Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 276.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while RY trades at $197.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check RY's competition here
NTRS vs WFC Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 250.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PL Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 239B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PL trades at $1,169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 242.13. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PL's competition here
NTRS vs C Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 229.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while C trades at $134.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas C's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check C's competition here
NTRS vs MUFG Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 223.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while MUFG trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check MUFG's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PQ Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
NTRS vs TD Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 193.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while TD trades at $114.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check TD's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PY Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PY's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PR Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PR's competition here
NTRS vs SAN Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 180.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while SAN trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check SAN's competition here
NTRS vs UBS Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while UBS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check UBS's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PM Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 150.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PM trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PM's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PN Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 139.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PN trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PN's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PS Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PS trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PS's competition here
NTRS vs BBVA Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BBVA trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BBVA's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PO Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PO trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PO's competition here
NTRS vs C-PJ Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check C-PJ's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PQ Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
NTRS vs BAC-PP Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 116.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAC-PP trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAC-PP's competition here
NTRS vs BMO Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BMO trades at $165.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BMO's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PC Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PC trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.86. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PC's competition here
NTRS vs CM Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while CM trades at $110.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check CM's competition here
NTRS vs BNS Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BNS trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BNS's competition here
NTRS vs RY-PT Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check RY-PT's competition here
NTRS vs SMFG Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while SMFG trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check SMFG's competition here
NTRS vs USB Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while USB trades at $56.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check USB's competition here
NTRS vs USB-PQ Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while USB-PQ trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check USB-PQ's competition here
NTRS vs USB-PR Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while USB-PR trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check USB-PR's competition here
NTRS vs ING Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while ING trades at $29.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check ING's competition here
NTRS vs BCS Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BCS trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BCS's competition here
NTRS vs USB-PH Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while USB-PH trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check USB-PH's competition here
NTRS vs USB-PP Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while USB-PP trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check USB-PP's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PZ Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
NTRS vs NU Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while NU trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check NU's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PA Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PA trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PA's competition here
NTRS vs WFC-PD Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WFC-PD trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WFC-PD's competition here
NTRS vs JPM-PJ Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
NTRS vs JPM-PL Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while JPM-PL trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check JPM-PL's competition here
NTRS vs JPM-PK Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while JPM-PK trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check JPM-PK's competition here
NTRS vs C-PK Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check C-PK's competition here
NTRS vs JPM-PM Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while JPM-PM trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check JPM-PM's competition here
NTRS vs NWG Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while NWG trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check NWG's competition here
NTRS vs NTRSO Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while NTRSO trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check NTRSO's competition here
NTRS vs BAP Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while BAP trades at $349.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check BAP's competition here
NTRS vs EWBC Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while EWBC trades at $128.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check EWBC's competition here
NTRS vs CS Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check CS's competition here
NTRS vs NTB Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while NTB trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check NTB's competition here
NTRS vs TANNL Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check TANNL's competition here
NTRS vs FRC-PL Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check FRC-PL's competition here
NTRS vs WBK Comparison June 2026
NTRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTRS stands at 31.6B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTRS is priced at $170.60, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTRS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.86, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, NTRS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTRS is more volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTRS.Check WBK's competition here