Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OSCR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Plans Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSCR | $28.36 | +3.52% | 7.1B | -50.41 | -$0.54 | N/A |
| UNH | $406.42 | -0.04% | 375.1B | 31.08 | $13.29 | +2.17% |
| CVS | $101.30 | +4.35% | 123.8B | 42.57 | $2.28 | +2.71% |
| ANTM | $482.58 | +2.71% | 114.6B | 18.99 | $25.41 | +1.00% |
| ELV | $394.32 | -5.70% | 92.2B | 18.00 | $23.58 | +1.70% |
| CI | $295.96 | +2.19% | 78B | 2.59 | $113.73 | +2.08% |
| HUM | $368.75 | +3.59% | 43.6B | 38.80 | $9.36 | +0.97% |
| CNC | $63.68 | -2.08% | 32.7B | -5.07 | -$13.05 | N/A |
| MOH | $196.08 | -1.18% | 10.6B | 54.44 | $3.73 | N/A |
| ALHC | $19.92 | +29.76% | 4B | 192.00 | $0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OSCR vs UNH Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UNH has a market cap of 375.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while UNH trades at $406.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas UNH's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UNH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to UNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check UNH's competition here
OSCR vs CVS Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CVS has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while CVS trades at $101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas CVS's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CVS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to CVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check CVS's competition here
OSCR vs ANTM Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ANTM has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while ANTM trades at $482.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas ANTM's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ANTM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is less volatile compared to ANTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check ANTM's competition here
OSCR vs ELV Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ELV has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while ELV trades at $394.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas ELV's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to ELV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check ELV's competition here
OSCR vs CI Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CI has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while CI trades at $295.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas CI's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to CI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check CI's competition here
OSCR vs HUM Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HUM has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while HUM trades at $368.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas HUM's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to HUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check HUM's competition here
OSCR vs CNC Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CNC has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while CNC trades at $63.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas CNC's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to CNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check CNC's competition here
OSCR vs MOH Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MOH has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while MOH trades at $196.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas MOH's P/E ratio is 54.44. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MOH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is less volatile compared to MOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check MOH's competition here
OSCR vs ALHC Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ALHC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while ALHC trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas ALHC's P/E ratio is 192.00. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is less volatile compared to ALHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check ALHC's competition here
OSCR vs CLOV Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CLOV has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while CLOV trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas CLOV's P/E ratio is -35.75. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLOV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is less volatile compared to CLOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check CLOV's competition here
OSCR vs BHG Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BHG has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while BHG trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas BHG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHG's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is less volatile compared to BHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check BHG's competition here
OSCR vs CABR Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CABR has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while CABR trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas CABR's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CABR's ROE of -3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is less volatile compared to CABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check CABR's competition here
OSCR vs BMGL Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BMGL has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while BMGL trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas BMGL's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BMGL's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is less volatile compared to BMGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check BMGL's competition here
OSCR vs MGLN Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MGLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while MGLN trades at $94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas MGLN's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MGLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to MGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check MGLN's competition here
OSCR vs AET Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AET has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while AET trades at $106.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas AET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AET's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to AET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check AET's competition here
OSCR vs GTS Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while GTS trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas GTS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to GTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check GTS's competition here
OSCR vs UAM Comparison June 2026
OSCR plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSCR stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSCR is priced at $28.36, while UAM trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSCR currently has a P/E ratio of -50.41, whereas UAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSCR's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UAM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OSCR is more volatile compared to UAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSCR.Check UAM's competition here