Pamt Corp. (PAMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAMT | $15.84 | +12.50% | 300.3M | -6.80 | -$2.11 | N/A |
| ODFL | $245.96 | -0.43% | 51.7B | 51.93 | $4.79 | +0.48% |
| TFII | $158.83 | -2.77% | 13.1B | 44.39 | $3.59 | +1.20% |
| KNX | $81.65 | +1.16% | 13.1B | 382.62 | $0.21 | +0.96% |
| SAIA | $485.07 | +0.91% | 12.8B | 50.40 | $9.51 | N/A |
| SNDR | $38.46 | -0.77% | 6.7B | 67.91 | $0.56 | +1.04% |
| RXO | $28.61 | +1.92% | 4.8B | -46.97 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ARCB | $173.00 | +4.08% | 3.9B | 71.28 | $2.43 | +0.29% |
| WERN | $44.34 | -0.39% | 2.6B | -290.00 | -$0.15 | +1.31% |
| MRTN | $18.29 | +1.13% | 1.5B | 100.17 | $0.18 | +1.36% |
Stock Comparison
PAMT vs ODFL Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while ODFL trades at $245.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 51.93. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check ODFL's competition here
PAMT vs TFII Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while TFII trades at $158.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 44.39. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check TFII's competition here
PAMT vs KNX Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while KNX trades at $81.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 382.62. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check KNX's competition here
PAMT vs SAIA Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while SAIA trades at $485.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check SAIA's competition here
PAMT vs SNDR Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while SNDR trades at $38.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 67.91. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check SNDR's competition here
PAMT vs RXO Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while RXO trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -46.97. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check RXO's competition here
PAMT vs ARCB Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while ARCB trades at $173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 71.28. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check ARCB's competition here
PAMT vs WERN Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while WERN trades at $44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is -290.00. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check WERN's competition here
PAMT vs MRTN Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while MRTN trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 100.17. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check MRTN's competition here
PAMT vs HTLD Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while HTLD trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -29.11. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check HTLD's competition here
PAMT vs CVLG Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while CVLG trades at $46.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 500.89. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check CVLG's competition here
PAMT vs ULH Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while ULH trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check ULH's competition here
PAMT vs PTSI Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check PTSI's competition here
PAMT vs DSKE Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check DSKE's competition here
PAMT vs USX Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check USX's competition here
PAMT vs PATI Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while PATI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check PATI's competition here
PAMT vs TSP Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check TSP's competition here
PAMT vs YELL Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check YELL's competition here
PAMT vs BEST Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check BEST's competition here
PAMT vs SLGB Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while SLGB trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -7672.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check SLGB's competition here
PAMT vs TOPP Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while TOPP trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check TOPP's competition here
PAMT vs ETS Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, ETS has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while ETS trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas ETS's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ETS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to ETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check ETS's competition here
PAMT vs HXHX Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while HXHX trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check HXHX's competition here
PAMT vs YGMZ Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check YGMZ's competition here
PAMT vs USAK Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check USAK's competition here
PAMT vs AXPW Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check AXPW's competition here
PAMT vs DSKEW Comparison June 2026
PAMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAMT stands at 300.3M. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAMT is priced at $15.84, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAMT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.80, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAMT's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PAMT is less volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAMT.Check DSKEW's competition here