Shell plc (RDS-B) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDS-B) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS-B | $51.06 | -0.06% | 0 | 42.98 | $1.19 | +3.21% |
| XOM | $147.01 | +0.28% | 609.3B | 24.75 | $5.94 | +2.77% |
| CVX | $187.22 | +0.75% | 372.8B | 32.61 | $5.74 | +3.73% |
| SHEL | $85.66 | -0.22% | 238.8B | 13.34 | $6.42 | +3.44% |
| TTE | $88.02 | +0.34% | 196B | 13.06 | $6.74 | +4.49% |
| PBR | $18.38 | +0.77% | 118.4B | 5.85 | $3.14 | +6.31% |
| BP | $42.78 | +0.23% | 112.2B | 34.49 | $1.24 | +4.67% |
| PBR-A | $16.32 | -0.12% | 105.1B | 5.19 | $3.14 | +7.07% |
| EQNR | $36.18 | -1.55% | 91.7B | 16.37 | $2.21 | +4.14% |
| E | $53.50 | -1.04% | 78.5B | 23.36 | $2.29 | +4.56% |
Stock Comparison
RDS-B vs XOM Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 609.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while XOM trades at $147.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check XOM's competition here
RDS-B vs CVX Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 372.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while CVX trades at $187.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check CVX's competition here
RDS-B vs SHEL Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 238.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SHEL trades at $85.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check SHEL's competition here
RDS-B vs TTE Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 196B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while TTE trades at $88.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check TTE's competition here
RDS-B vs PBR Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while PBR trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check PBR's competition here
RDS-B vs BP Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while BP trades at $42.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check BP's competition here
RDS-B vs PBR-A Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while PBR-A trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check PBR-A's competition here
RDS-B vs EQNR Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while EQNR trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check EQNR's competition here
RDS-B vs E Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, E has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while E trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas E's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check E's competition here
RDS-B vs SU Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SU trades at $61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check SU's competition here
RDS-B vs IMO Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while IMO trades at $121.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check IMO's competition here
RDS-B vs CVE Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while CVE trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check CVE's competition here
RDS-B vs EC Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while EC trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check EC's competition here
RDS-B vs YPF Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while YPF trades at $55.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -53.73. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check YPF's competition here
RDS-B vs NFG Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while NFG trades at $77.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check NFG's competition here
RDS-B vs TGS Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while TGS trades at $33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check TGS's competition here
RDS-B vs TANNZ Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check TANNZ's competition here
RDS-B vs SLNG Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SLNG trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -25.60. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check SLNG's competition here
RDS-B vs CGBS Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check CGBS's competition here
RDS-B vs ZEST Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check ZEST's competition here
RDS-B vs SKYQ Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SKYQ trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check SKYQ's competition here
RDS-B vs CGBSW Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check CGBSW's competition here
RDS-B vs TELZ Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check TELZ's competition here
RDS-B vs RDS-A Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check RDS-A's competition here
RDS-B vs PTR Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check PTR's competition here
RDS-B vs SNP Comparison June 2026
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at 0. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.Check SNP's competition here