Regency Ceramics Limited (REGENCERAM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (REGENCERAM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGENCERAM.NS | ₹40.81 | +0.15% | 1.1B | -4.42 | -₹9.02 | N/A |
| SUPREMEIND.NS | ₹3,462.90 | -0.73% | 437.5B | 45.88 | ₹75.06 | +1.02% |
| SUPREMEIND.BO | ₹3,450.00 | -0.91% | 437.1B | 45.83 | ₹75.12 | +1.02% |
| ASTRAL.NS | ₹1,503.70 | +0.15% | 400.3B | 74.55 | ₹19.99 | +0.25% |
| ASTRAL.BO | ₹1,503.00 | +0.23% | 400.2B | 74.52 | ₹20.00 | +0.25% |
| GRINDWELL.NS | ₹1,918.90 | +0.21% | 209.8B | 50.54 | ₹37.50 | +0.90% |
| GRINDWELL.BO | ₹1,919.85 | +0.23% | 209.5B | 55.06 | ₹34.38 | +0.90% |
| KAJARIACER.NS | ₹1,083.80 | +1.54% | 171.5B | 42.29 | ₹25.47 | +1.11% |
| KAJARIACER.BO | ₹1,078.80 | +0.99% | 171.5B | 42.21 | ₹25.48 | +1.11% |
| FINPIPE.NS | ₹169.96 | -0.61% | 104.3B | 17.41 | ₹9.69 | +2.13% |
Stock Comparison
REGENCERAM.NS vs SUPREMEIND.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.NS has a market cap of 437.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while SUPREMEIND.NS trades at ₹3,462.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SUPREMEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SUPREMEIND.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check SUPREMEIND.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs SUPREMEIND.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.BO has a market cap of 437.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while SUPREMEIND.BO trades at ₹3,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SUPREMEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 45.83. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SUPREMEIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check SUPREMEIND.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ASTRAL.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASTRAL.NS has a market cap of 400.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ASTRAL.NS trades at ₹1,503.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ASTRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 74.55. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ASTRAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ASTRAL.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ASTRAL.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASTRAL.BO has a market cap of 400.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ASTRAL.BO trades at ₹1,503.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ASTRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 74.52. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ASTRAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ASTRAL.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs GRINDWELL.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.NS has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while GRINDWELL.NS trades at ₹1,918.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas GRINDWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GRINDWELL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to GRINDWELL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check GRINDWELL.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs GRINDWELL.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRINDWELL.BO has a market cap of 209.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while GRINDWELL.BO trades at ₹1,919.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas GRINDWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.06. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GRINDWELL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to GRINDWELL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check GRINDWELL.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs KAJARIACER.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.NS has a market cap of 171.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while KAJARIACER.NS trades at ₹1,083.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas KAJARIACER.NS's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KAJARIACER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check KAJARIACER.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs KAJARIACER.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KAJARIACER.BO has a market cap of 171.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while KAJARIACER.BO trades at ₹1,078.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas KAJARIACER.BO's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KAJARIACER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to KAJARIACER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check KAJARIACER.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs FINPIPE.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FINPIPE.NS has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while FINPIPE.NS trades at ₹169.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas FINPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FINPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to FINPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check FINPIPE.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs CERA.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CERA.BO has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while CERA.BO trades at ₹6,000.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas CERA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CERA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to CERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check CERA.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs CERA.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CERA.NS has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while CERA.NS trades at ₹6,003.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas CERA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CERA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to CERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check CERA.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹274.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹273.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs POKARNA.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, POKARNA.BO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while POKARNA.BO trades at ₹827.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas POKARNA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to POKARNA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to POKARNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check POKARNA.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs POKARNA.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, POKARNA.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while POKARNA.NS trades at ₹828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas POKARNA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to POKARNA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to POKARNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check POKARNA.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs RAMCOIND.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while RAMCOIND.NS trades at ₹282.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas RAMCOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RAMCOIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to RAMCOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check RAMCOIND.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs RAMCOIND.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RAMCOIND.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while RAMCOIND.BO trades at ₹277.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas RAMCOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RAMCOIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to RAMCOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check RAMCOIND.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs NITCO.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NITCO.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while NITCO.BO trades at ₹98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas NITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 78.89. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NITCO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to NITCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check NITCO.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs NITCO.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NITCO.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while NITCO.NS trades at ₹97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas NITCO.NS's P/E ratio is 78.78. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NITCO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to NITCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check NITCO.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs APOLLOPIPE.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPE.NS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while APOLLOPIPE.NS trades at ₹487.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas APOLLOPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 460.24. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check APOLLOPIPE.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs SOMANYCERA.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.NS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while SOMANYCERA.NS trades at ₹511.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SOMANYCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOMANYCERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check SOMANYCERA.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs SOMANYCERA.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SOMANYCERA.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while SOMANYCERA.BO trades at ₹513.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SOMANYCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOMANYCERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to SOMANYCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check SOMANYCERA.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs HIL.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HIL.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while HIL.NS trades at ₹1,845.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas HIL.NS's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to HIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check HIL.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs HIL.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HIL.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while HIL.BO trades at ₹1,843.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas HIL.BO's P/E ratio is -42.18. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to HIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check HIL.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ASIANTILES.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ASIANTILES.BO trades at ₹59.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ASIANTILES.BO's P/E ratio is 84.54. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ASIANTILES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ASIANTILES.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ASIANTILES.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASIANTILES.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ASIANTILES.NS trades at ₹59.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ASIANTILES.NS's P/E ratio is 84.47. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ASIANTILES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to ASIANTILES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ASIANTILES.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs HARDWYN.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HARDWYN.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while HARDWYN.NS trades at ₹24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas HARDWYN.NS's P/E ratio is 89.37. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HARDWYN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check HARDWYN.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs HARDWYN.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HARDWYN.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while HARDWYN.BO trades at ₹24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas HARDWYN.BO's P/E ratio is 89.44. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HARDWYN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to HARDWYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check HARDWYN.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs SEJALLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SEJALLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while SEJALLTD.NS trades at ₹666.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas SEJALLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SEJALLTD.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to SEJALLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check SEJALLTD.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs BIGBLOC.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while BIGBLOC.NS trades at ₹48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas BIGBLOC.NS's P/E ratio is -397.33. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BIGBLOC.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to BIGBLOC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check BIGBLOC.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs BIGBLOC.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIGBLOC.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while BIGBLOC.BO trades at ₹48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas BIGBLOC.BO's P/E ratio is -399.08. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BIGBLOC.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to BIGBLOC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check BIGBLOC.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs VISAKAIND.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while VISAKAIND.BO trades at ₹75.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas VISAKAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VISAKAIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to VISAKAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check VISAKAIND.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs VISAKAIND.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VISAKAIND.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while VISAKAIND.NS trades at ₹75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas VISAKAIND.NS's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VISAKAIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to VISAKAIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check VISAKAIND.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs KRITIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KRITIIND.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while KRITIIND.BO trades at ₹117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas KRITIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KRITIIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to KRITIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check KRITIIND.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs PPL.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PPL.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while PPL.NS trades at ₹241.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas PPL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to PPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check PPL.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs PPL.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PPL.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while PPL.BO trades at ₹242.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas PPL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to PPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check PPL.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs EVERESTIND.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while EVERESTIND.NS trades at ₹324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas EVERESTIND.NS's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EVERESTIND.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to EVERESTIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check EVERESTIND.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs EVERESTIND.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EVERESTIND.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while EVERESTIND.BO trades at ₹326.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas EVERESTIND.BO's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EVERESTIND.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to EVERESTIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check EVERESTIND.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ORIENTBELL.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ORIENTBELL.BO trades at ₹314.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ORIENTBELL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ORIENTBELL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ORIENTBELL.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ORIENTBELL.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ORIENTBELL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ORIENTBELL.NS trades at ₹315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ORIENTBELL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ORIENTBELL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTBELL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ORIENTBELL.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs KRITI.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KRITI.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while KRITI.NS trades at ₹71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas KRITI.NS's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KRITI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to KRITI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check KRITI.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs EXXARO.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EXXARO.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while EXXARO.BO trades at ₹7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas EXXARO.BO's P/E ratio is 107.17. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EXXARO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to EXXARO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check EXXARO.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs EXXARO.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EXXARO.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while EXXARO.NS trades at ₹7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas EXXARO.NS's P/E ratio is 106.67. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EXXARO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to EXXARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check EXXARO.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs MURUDCERA.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while MURUDCERA.BO trades at ₹30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas MURUDCERA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MURUDCERA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check MURUDCERA.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs MURUDCERA.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MURUDCERA.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while MURUDCERA.NS trades at ₹31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas MURUDCERA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MURUDCERA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to MURUDCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check MURUDCERA.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs BEARDSELL.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while BEARDSELL.BO trades at ₹37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas BEARDSELL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BEARDSELL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check BEARDSELL.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs TEXMOPIPES.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while TEXMOPIPES.NS trades at ₹44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas TEXMOPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check TEXMOPIPES.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs TEXMOPIPES.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TEXMOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while TEXMOPIPES.BO trades at ₹44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas TEXMOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to TEXMOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check TEXMOPIPES.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs BEARDSELL.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BEARDSELL.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while BEARDSELL.NS trades at ₹27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas BEARDSELL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BEARDSELL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to BEARDSELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check BEARDSELL.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs REGENCERAM.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, REGENCERAM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while REGENCERAM.BO trades at ₹38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas REGENCERAM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to REGENCERAM.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to REGENCERAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check REGENCERAM.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs AHLADA.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHLADA.NS has a market cap of 514.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while AHLADA.NS trades at ₹39.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas AHLADA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AHLADA.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to AHLADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check AHLADA.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ORIENTALTL.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.NS has a market cap of 463.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ORIENTALTL.NS trades at ₹6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ORIENTALTL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ORIENTALTL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ORIENTALTL.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs ORIENTALTL.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ORIENTALTL.BO has a market cap of 460.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while ORIENTALTL.BO trades at ₹6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas ORIENTALTL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ORIENTALTL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTALTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check ORIENTALTL.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs AROGRANITE.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.BO has a market cap of 384.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while AROGRANITE.BO trades at ₹24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas AROGRANITE.BO's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AROGRANITE.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check AROGRANITE.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs AROGRANITE.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AROGRANITE.NS has a market cap of 375.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while AROGRANITE.NS trades at ₹24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas AROGRANITE.NS's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AROGRANITE.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to AROGRANITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check AROGRANITE.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs MADHAV.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MADHAV.NS has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while MADHAV.NS trades at ₹36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas MADHAV.NS's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MADHAV.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to MADHAV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check MADHAV.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs MADHAV.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MADHAV.BO has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while MADHAV.BO trades at ₹36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas MADHAV.BO's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MADHAV.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is more volatile compared to MADHAV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check MADHAV.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs LEXUS.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LEXUS.NS has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while LEXUS.NS trades at ₹15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas LEXUS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LEXUS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to LEXUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check LEXUS.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs TIJARIA.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TIJARIA.NS has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while TIJARIA.NS trades at ₹4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas TIJARIA.NS's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TIJARIA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check TIJARIA.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs TIJARIA.BO Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TIJARIA.BO has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while TIJARIA.BO trades at ₹4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas TIJARIA.BO's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TIJARIA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to TIJARIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check TIJARIA.BO's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs EUROCERA.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EUROCERA.NS has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while EUROCERA.NS trades at ₹1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas EUROCERA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EUROCERA.NS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, REGENCERAM.NS is less volatile compared to EUROCERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGENCERAM.NS.Check EUROCERA.NS's competition here
REGENCERAM.NS vs TIL-RE.NS Comparison June 2026
REGENCERAM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGENCERAM.NS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TIL-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, REGENCERAM.NS is priced at ₹40.81, while TIL-RE.NS trades at ₹158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGENCERAM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.42, whereas TIL-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGENCERAM.NS's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TIL-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. REGENCERAM.NS has daily volatility of 2.29 and TIL-RE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TIL-RE.NS's competition here