Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PWR has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while PWR trades at $669.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas PWR's P/E ratio is 58.14. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to PWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check PWR's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while FIX trades at $1,666.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 48.95. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check FIX's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while FER trades at $63.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check FER's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while EME trades at $788.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check EME's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MTZ trades at $268.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MTZ's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while APG trades at $42.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas APG's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check APG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while J trades at $148.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas J's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to J's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to J. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check J's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while STRL trades at $517.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check STRL's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while IESC trades at $681.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 44.73. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check IESC's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while DY trades at $399.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check DY's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while BLD trades at $354.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to BLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check BLD's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while TTEK trades at $36.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check TTEK's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while STN trades at $73.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check STN's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while ACM trades at $65.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to ACM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check ACM's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while LGN trades at $60.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is 297.57. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check LGN's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while FLR trades at $52.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to FLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check FLR's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while AGX trades at $505.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check AGX's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while ECG trades at $124.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check ECG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while GVA trades at $124.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check GVA's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MYRG trades at $320.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 35.94. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MYRG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while KBR trades at $37.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check KBR's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while TPC trades at $89.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to TPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check TPC's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while PRIM trades at $78.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check PRIM's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while EXPO trades at $69.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check EXPO's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while NEXT trades at $6.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -8.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check NEXT's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ITG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while ITG trades at $12.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas ITG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to ITG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check ITG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while NVEE trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check NVEE's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while AMRC trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 41.62. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check AMRC's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while WLDN trades at $84.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check WLDN's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while JUNE trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check JUNE's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while GLDD trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check GLDD's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 745M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while BWMN trades at $42.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check BWMN's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CDNL has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while CDNL trades at $41.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas CDNL's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDNL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to CDNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check CDNL's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 521M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while LMB trades at $43.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to LMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check LMB's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while PHOE trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 716.00. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PHOE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check PHOE's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 455.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while BBCP trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check BBCP's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 387.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while ORN trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to ORN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check ORN's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 321.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MTRX trades at $11.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -40.82. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MTRX's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MAGH trades at $6.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MAGH's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while ESOA trades at $11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check ESOA's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while AENZ trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check AENZ's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while SHIM trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check SHIM's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check CSLRW's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while BNC trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check BNC's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while OEG trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check OEG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while VATE trades at $7.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check VATE's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while AGFY trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check AGFY's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while SKBL trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check SKBL's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while BLNK trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check BLNK's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KAZR has a market cap of 57.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while KAZR trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas KAZR's P/E ratio is 102.50. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAZR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to KAZR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check KAZR's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while SLND trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLND's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to SLND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check SLND's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while DRTT trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check DRTT's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while PGHL trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check PGHL's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while ONEG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -51.50. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check ONEG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MSW trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to MSW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MSW's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PMA has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while PMA trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas PMA's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to PMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check PMA's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while WLMS trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check WLMS's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while SKK trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -44.08. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to SKK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check SKK's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while SUNE trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check SUNE's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while ENG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check ENG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while FBGL trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check FBGL's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MIMI trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MIMI's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while RITR trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to RITR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check RITR's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MSGY trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 52.80. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSGY's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MSGY's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BRNX has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while BRNX trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas BRNX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRNX's ROE of -5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to BRNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check BRNX's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while OIG trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check OIG's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while MGN trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to MGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check MGN's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while WLGS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check WLGS's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while OFAL trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OFAL's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check OFAL's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 388.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while FGL trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check FGL's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while CBI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check CBI's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while IEA trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check IEA's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check IEAWW's competition here

Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROAD stands at 6.5B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD is priced at $112.81 on the NASDAQ, while HIL trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROAD currently has a P/E ratio of 45.70, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROAD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.Check HIL's competition here