Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SBSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBSW | $9.77 | +0.46% | 6.8B | -21.31 | -$0.45 | +3.42% |
| NEM | $99.18 | +0.19% | 105.2B | 12.78 | $7.71 | +1.10% |
| AEM | $162.37 | +0.16% | 80.1B | 15.06 | $10.62 | +1.11% |
| B | $39.83 | +0.94% | 65.6B | 12.75 | $3.07 | +2.47% |
| WPM | $115.88 | +0.88% | 51.1B | 28.50 | $3.95 | +0.67% |
| AU | $85.70 | +1.46% | 42.7B | 12.08 | $6.99 | +5.86% |
| FNV | $208.87 | -2.74% | 40.9B | 29.84 | $7.11 | +0.76% |
| GFI | $36.12 | +0.67% | 31.8B | 9.01 | $3.94 | +5.27% |
| KGC | $25.28 | -2.24% | 30.2B | 10.75 | $2.35 | +0.61% |
| AGI | $35.08 | -2.22% | 14.7B | 13.94 | $2.51 | +0.35% |
Stock Comparison
SBSW vs NEM Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NEM trades at $99.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NEM's competition here
SBSW vs AEM Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while AEM trades at $162.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check AEM's competition here
SBSW vs B Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while B trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas B's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to B's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check B's competition here
SBSW vs WPM Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while WPM trades at $115.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check WPM's competition here
SBSW vs AU Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while AU trades at $85.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check AU's competition here
SBSW vs FNV Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while FNV trades at $208.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check FNV's competition here
SBSW vs GFI Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while GFI trades at $36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check GFI's competition here
SBSW vs KGC Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while KGC trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check KGC's competition here
SBSW vs AGI Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while AGI trades at $35.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check AGI's competition here
SBSW vs RGLD Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while RGLD trades at $206.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check RGLD's competition here
SBSW vs CDE Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while CDE trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check CDE's competition here
SBSW vs HMY Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while HMY trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check HMY's competition here
SBSW vs IAG Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while IAG trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check IAG's competition here
SBSW vs EQX Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while EQX trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check EQX's competition here
SBSW vs NGD Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NGD trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NGD's competition here
SBSW vs OR Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while OR trades at $33.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check OR's competition here
SBSW vs EGO Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while EGO trades at $30.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check EGO's competition here
SBSW vs AUY Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check AUY's competition here
SBSW vs BTG Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while BTG trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check BTG's competition here
SBSW vs SSRM Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while SSRM trades at $26.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check SSRM's competition here
SBSW vs FSAGX Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FSAGX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while FSAGX trades at $52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas FSAGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FSAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to FSAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check FSAGX's competition here
SBSW vs ARMN Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while ARMN trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 71.22. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check ARMN's competition here
SBSW vs ORLA Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while ORLA trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check ORLA's competition here
SBSW vs SAND Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check SAND's competition here
SBSW vs AAUC Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while AAUC trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -24.05. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check AAUC's competition here
SBSW vs NG Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NG trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NG's competition here
SBSW vs CGAU Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while CGAU trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check CGAU's competition here
SBSW vs SA Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while SA trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -55.60. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check SA's competition here
SBSW vs FSM Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while FSM trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to FSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check FSM's competition here
SBSW vs HYMC Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while HYMC trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -24.60. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check HYMC's competition here
SBSW vs DRD Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while DRD trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check DRD's competition here
SBSW vs CNL Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while CNL trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check CNL's competition here
SBSW vs IAUX Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while IAUX trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check IAUX's competition here
SBSW vs DC Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 654.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while DC trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check DC's competition here
SBSW vs GAU Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 535.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while GAU trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check GAU's competition here
SBSW vs IDR Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 509.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while IDR trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check IDR's competition here
SBSW vs NVAWW Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 506.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NVAWW trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NVAWW's competition here
SBSW vs GSS Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check GSS's competition here
SBSW vs DC-WT Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check DC-WT's competition here
SBSW vs THM Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 426.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while THM trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -206.00. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check THM's competition here
SBSW vs KOR Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, KOR has a market cap of 415.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while KOR trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas KOR's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KOR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to KOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check KOR's competition here
SBSW vs CMCL Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while CMCL trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check CMCL's competition here
SBSW vs NFGC Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 365.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NFGC trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NFGC's competition here
SBSW vs ODV Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while ODV trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check ODV's competition here
SBSW vs VGZ Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 316.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while VGZ trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -36.17. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check VGZ's competition here
SBSW vs TRX Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while TRX trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check TRX's competition here
SBSW vs USAU Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 243.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while USAU trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to USAU's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check USAU's competition here
SBSW vs GLDG Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while GLDG trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check GLDG's competition here
SBSW vs CTGO Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while CTGO trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check CTGO's competition here
SBSW vs MINE Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while MINE trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check MINE's competition here
SBSW vs GORO Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while GORO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GORO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check GORO's competition here
SBSW vs GSV Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check GSV's competition here
SBSW vs NVA Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NVA trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NVA's competition here
SBSW vs NAMM Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NAMM trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NAMM's competition here
SBSW vs PZG Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while PZG trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check PZG's competition here
SBSW vs BGL Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while BGL trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BGL's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check BGL's competition here
SBSW vs AAU Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check AAU's competition here
SBSW vs AUST Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while AUST trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check AUST's competition here
SBSW vs ODVWZ Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while ODVWZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check ODVWZ's competition here
SBSW vs ATCX Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ATCX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while ATCX trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas ATCX's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATCX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to ATCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check ATCX's competition here
SBSW vs NAMMW Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while NAMMW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check NAMMW's competition here
SBSW vs BGLWW Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while BGLWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check BGLWW's competition here
SBSW vs HYMCZ Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check HYMCZ's competition here
SBSW vs HYMCL Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check HYMCL's competition here
SBSW vs HYMCW Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check HYMCW's competition here
SBSW vs GPL Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check GPL's competition here
SBSW vs KLDX Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, KLDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while KLDX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas KLDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KLDX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is more volatile compared to KLDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check KLDX's competition here
SBSW vs KL Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check KL's competition here
SBSW vs PVG Comparison June 2026
SBSW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBSW stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBSW is priced at $9.77, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBSW currently has a P/E ratio of -21.31, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBSW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBSW is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBSW.Check PVG's competition here