SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | $10.81 | -1.46% | 1.4B | 45.04 | $0.24 | +7.59% |
| KEX | $140.64 | +0.30% | 7.5B | 21.64 | $6.50 | N/A |
| MATX | $191.24 | -1.20% | 5.8B | 14.18 | $13.49 | +0.75% |
| HAFN | $7.23 | +1.26% | 3.6B | 8.03 | $0.90 | +10.12% |
| CMBT | $14.42 | -1.97% | 3.3B | 8.29 | $1.74 | +5.89% |
| ZIM | $24.34 | +1.50% | 2.9B | 29.68 | $0.82 | +8.18% |
| SBLK | $25.81 | -3.51% | 2.9B | 20.65 | $1.25 | +3.99% |
| BWLP | $18.10 | -3.52% | 2.7B | 7.61 | $2.38 | +10.24% |
| SB-PD | $26.30 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 17.44 | $1.51 | +2.99% |
| SB-PC | $26.10 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 17.31 | $1.51 | +2.99% |
Stock Comparison
SFL vs KEX Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while KEX trades at $140.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check KEX's competition here
SFL vs MATX Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while MATX trades at $191.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check MATX's competition here
SFL vs HAFN Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while HAFN trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HAFN's competition here
SFL vs CMBT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CMBT trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMBT's competition here
SFL vs ZIM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while ZIM trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ZIM's competition here
SFL vs SBLK Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SBLK trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBLK's competition here
SFL vs BWLP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while BWLP trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check BWLP's competition here
SFL vs SB-PD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SB-PD trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB-PD's competition here
SFL vs SB-PC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SB-PC trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB-PC's competition here
SFL vs TNK Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while TNK trades at $74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TNK's competition here
SFL vs DAC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while DAC trades at $125.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DAC's competition here
SFL vs CDLR Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CDLR trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CDLR's competition here
SFL vs NMM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while NMM trades at $70.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NMM's competition here
SFL vs CMRE Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CMRE trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
SFL vs ECO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while ECO trades at $52.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ECO's competition here
SFL vs GOGL Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GOGL's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CMRE-PD trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
SFL vs GSL-PB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GSL-PB trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSL-PB's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CMRE-PB trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
SFL vs GSL Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GSL trades at $37.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSL's competition here
SFL vs SBBA Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBBA's competition here
SFL vs NAT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while NAT trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NAT's competition here
SFL vs CCEC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CCEC trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CCEC's competition here
SFL vs GNK Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GNK trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 60.72. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GNK's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PE Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
SFL vs CPLP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CPLP's competition here
SFL vs ASC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 696.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while ASC trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ASC's competition here
SFL vs SB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 682.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SB trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB's competition here
SFL vs HSHP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 653.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while HSHP trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HSHP's competition here
SFL vs CLCO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CLCO's competition here
SFL vs ESEA Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while ESEA trades at $68.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ESEA's competition here
SFL vs PANL Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while PANL trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PANL's competition here
SFL vs NETI Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NETI's competition here
SFL vs CMDB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 409.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CMDB trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMDB's competition here
SFL vs KNOP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while KNOP trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check KNOP's competition here
SFL vs OP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while OP trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check OP's competition here
SFL vs SHIP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 308.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SHIP trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIP's competition here
SFL vs GASS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GASS trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GASS's competition here
SFL vs DSX Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while DSX trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DSX's competition here
SFL vs ESEAV Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ESEAV's competition here
SFL vs DSX-PB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while DSX-PB trades at $26.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DSX-PB's competition here
SFL vs SMHI Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 180.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SMHI trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SMHI's competition here
SFL vs TORO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while TORO trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 251.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TORO's competition here
SFL vs EDRY Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while EDRY trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -210.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EDRY's competition here
SFL vs HMR Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while HMR trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HMR's competition here
SFL vs GLBS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GLBS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -34.37. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GLBS's competition here
SFL vs NM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM's competition here
SFL vs NM-PH Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM-PH's competition here
SFL vs PXSAP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXSAP's competition here
SFL vs PXS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while PXS trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXS's competition here
SFL vs EHLDV Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EHLDV's competition here
SFL vs NM-PG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM-PG's competition here
SFL vs TOROV Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TOROV's competition here
SFL vs VNTG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while VNTG trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 42.75. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check VNTG's competition here
SFL vs USEA Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while USEA trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check USEA's competition here
SFL vs UFG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while UFG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check UFG's competition here
SFL vs CACO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CACO's competition here
SFL vs HTCO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while HTCO trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HTCO's competition here
SFL vs EHLD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while EHLD trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EHLD's competition here
SFL vs PSHG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while PSHG trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PSHG's competition here
SFL vs CTRM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CTRM trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CTRM's competition here
SFL vs SVRN Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SVRN trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SVRN's competition here
SFL vs TOPS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while TOPS trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TOPS's competition here
SFL vs NCT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while NCT trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NCT's competition here
SFL vs CISS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 388.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while CISS trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CISS's competition here
SFL vs ICON Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 364K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while ICON trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ICON's competition here
SFL vs PXSAW Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXSAW's competition here
SFL vs SHIPW Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIPW's competition here
SFL vs RUBI Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while RUBI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check RUBI's competition here
SFL vs SHIPZ Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIPZ's competition here
SFL vs GSLD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSLD's competition here
SFL vs SBLKZ Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBLKZ's competition here
SFL vs RLOG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check RLOG's competition here
SFL vs GNRT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $10.81, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 45.04, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GNRT's competition here