Shengfeng Development Limited (SFWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFWL | $0.89 | -10.22% | 77.6M | 6.72 | $0.14 | N/A |
| UPS | $108.08 | +0.35% | 91.7B | 17.45 | $6.18 | +6.35% |
| FDX | $337.74 | +2.28% | 79.2B | 17.71 | $18.73 | +1.46% |
| JBHT | $289.48 | +0.46% | 27.1B | 44.59 | $6.44 | +0.63% |
| XPO | $229.94 | +2.35% | 26.7B | 77.94 | $2.92 | N/A |
| FDXF | $176.24 | -1.42% | 23.8B | 41.42 | $4.55 | N/A |
| CHRW | $193.48 | +2.84% | 22.6B | 38.72 | $4.95 | +1.36% |
| EXPD | $166.30 | +1.75% | 21.8B | 26.87 | $6.19 | +0.96% |
| ZTO | $22.83 | +3.30% | 17.4B | 12.98 | $1.69 | +3.07% |
| LSTR | $224.20 | -0.52% | 7.6B | 61.73 | $3.62 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
SFWL vs UPS Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while UPS trades at $108.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UPS's competition here
SFWL vs FDX Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while FDX trades at $337.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FDX's competition here
SFWL vs JBHT Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while JBHT trades at $289.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JBHT's competition here
SFWL vs XPO Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while XPO trades at $229.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check XPO's competition here
SFWL vs FDXF Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, FDXF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while FDXF trades at $176.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas FDXF's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FDXF's competition here
SFWL vs CHRW Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while CHRW trades at $193.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CHRW's competition here
SFWL vs EXPD Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while EXPD trades at $166.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check EXPD's competition here
SFWL vs ZTO Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while ZTO trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ZTO's competition here
SFWL vs LSTR Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while LSTR trades at $224.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSTR's competition here
SFWL vs GXO Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while GXO trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GXO's competition here
SFWL vs HUBG Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while HUBG trades at $45.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check HUBG's competition here
SFWL vs PBI Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while PBI trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PBI's competition here
SFWL vs CYRX Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 765.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while CYRX trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CYRX's competition here
SFWL vs RLGT Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 429M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while RLGT trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check RLGT's competition here
SFWL vs FWRD Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 367.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while FWRD trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FWRD's competition here
SFWL vs PAL Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while PAL trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PAL's competition here
SFWL vs SINO Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SINO's competition here
SFWL vs CRGO Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while CRGO trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGO's competition here
SFWL vs CRGOW Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while CRGOW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CRGOW's competition here
SFWL vs AIRT Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while AIRT trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRT's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTP Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while AIRTP trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTP's competition here
SFWL vs NCEW Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while NCEW trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check NCEW's competition here
SFWL vs FLX Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while FLX trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check FLX's competition here
SFWL vs PSIG Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while PSIG trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check PSIG's competition here
SFWL vs BTOC Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while BTOC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check BTOC's competition here
SFWL vs ELOG Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while ELOG trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ELOG's competition here
SFWL vs LSH Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while LSH trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check LSH's competition here
SFWL vs GVH Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while GVH trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check GVH's competition here
SFWL vs CJMB Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while CJMB trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check CJMB's competition here
SFWL vs ATXG Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while ATXG trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ATXG's competition here
SFWL vs JYD Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while JYD trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check JYD's competition here
SFWL vs SGLY Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while SGLY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check SGLY's competition here
SFWL vs AIRTW Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check AIRTW's competition here
SFWL vs UTIW Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check UTIW's competition here
SFWL vs ECHO Comparison June 2026
SFWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFWL stands at 77.6M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFWL is priced at $0.89, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFWL currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFWL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFWL is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFWL.Check ECHO's competition here