Sequential Brands Group, Inc. (SQBG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SQBG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQBG | $6.24 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RL | $413.01 | +2.27% | 25.2B | 27.37 | $15.09 | +0.88% |
| LEVI | $23.70 | +1.33% | 9.3B | 17.43 | $1.36 | +2.36% |
| GIL | $51.89 | -2.33% | 7.9B | 30.35 | $1.71 | +1.83% |
| VFC | $17.33 | +3.77% | 6.8B | 27.08 | $0.64 | +2.08% |
| KTB | $78.17 | +4.13% | 4.3B | 15.76 | $4.96 | +2.70% |
| ZGN | $13.87 | -0.29% | 3.7B | 31.52 | $0.44 | +1.02% |
| PVH | $77.07 | +0.85% | 3.6B | 23.35 | $3.30 | +0.19% |
| COLM | $66.46 | +3.88% | 3.4B | 21.23 | $3.13 | +1.81% |
| UAA | $6.06 | +6.32% | 2.6B | -5.22 | -$1.16 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SQBG vs RL Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while RL trades at $413.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check RL's competition here
SQBG vs LEVI Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while LEVI trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check LEVI's competition here
SQBG vs GIL Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while GIL trades at $51.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check GIL's competition here
SQBG vs VFC Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while VFC trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VFC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check VFC's competition here
SQBG vs KTB Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while KTB trades at $78.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check KTB's competition here
SQBG vs ZGN Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while ZGN trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check ZGN's competition here
SQBG vs PVH Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while PVH trades at $77.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check PVH's competition here
SQBG vs COLM Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while COLM trades at $66.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check COLM's competition here
SQBG vs UAA Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while UAA trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check UAA's competition here
SQBG vs UA Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while UA trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check UA's competition here
SQBG vs HBI Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while HBI trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to HBI's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check HBI's competition here
SQBG vs FIGS Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while FIGS trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check FIGS's competition here
SQBG vs AIN Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while AIN trades at $71.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is -36.27. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AIN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check AIN's competition here
SQBG vs GIII Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while GIII trades at $34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check GIII's competition here
SQBG vs GOOS Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 950.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while GOOS trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 57.59. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check GOOS's competition here
SQBG vs OXM Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 543.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while OXM trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to OXM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check OXM's competition here
SQBG vs SGC Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while SGC trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check SGC's competition here
SQBG vs LAKE Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while LAKE trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check LAKE's competition here
SQBG vs VNCE Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 91.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while VNCE trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VNCE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check VNCE's competition here
SQBG vs UFI Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while UFI trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check UFI's competition here
SQBG vs FFFZ Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, FFFZ has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while FFFZ trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FFFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to FFFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check FFFZ's competition here
SQBG vs JRSH Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while JRSH trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to JRSH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check JRSH's competition here
SQBG vs CULP Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while CULP trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check CULP's competition here
SQBG vs JL Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while JL trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to JL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check JL's competition here
SQBG vs LLL Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to LLL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check LLL's competition here
SQBG vs XELB Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while XELB trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check XELB's competition here
SQBG vs PMNT Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while PMNT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -10.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check PMNT's competition here
SQBG vs NCI Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while NCI trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 137.63. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check NCI's competition here
SQBG vs JXJT Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check JXJT's competition here
SQBG vs DLA Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check DLA's competition here
SQBG vs KBSF Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check KBSF's competition here
SQBG vs EVK Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check EVK's competition here
SQBG vs PERY Comparison June 2026
SQBG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQBG stands at 0. In comparison, PERY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQBG is priced at $6.24, while PERY trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQBG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQBG's ROE is -1.42%, compared to PERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQBG is more volatile compared to PERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQBG.Check PERY's competition here