Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWW | $17.06 | +1.55% | 1.4B | 13.87 | $1.23 | +2.33% |
| NKE | $44.65 | +3.28% | 66B | 29.38 | $1.52 | +3.71% |
| DECK | $112.48 | +2.51% | 15.6B | 16.02 | $7.02 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $45.20 | +3.53% | 8.3B | 20.45 | $2.21 | N/A |
| CROX | $127.77 | +5.90% | 6.3B | -78.87 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| VSXY | $74.96 | -1.70% | 6B | 38.64 | $1.94 | N/A |
| SHOO | $44.96 | -0.77% | 3.3B | 42.42 | $1.06 | +1.90% |
| WINA | $387.62 | +4.70% | 1.4B | 34.89 | $11.11 | +3.57% |
| CAL | $13.77 | +1.03% | 464.6M | -65.57 | -$0.21 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
WWW vs NKE Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while NKE trades at $44.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check NKE's competition here
WWW vs DECK Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while DECK trades at $112.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check DECK's competition here
WWW vs SKX Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check SKX's competition here
WWW vs BIRK Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while BIRK trades at $45.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check BIRK's competition here
WWW vs CROX Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while CROX trades at $127.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -78.87. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check CROX's competition here
WWW vs VSXY Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VSXY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while VSXY trades at $74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas VSXY's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VSXY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to VSXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check VSXY's competition here
WWW vs SHOO Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while SHOO trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check SHOO's competition here
WWW vs WINA Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while WINA trades at $387.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check WINA's competition here
WWW vs CAL Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 464.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while CAL trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -65.57. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check CAL's competition here
WWW vs WEYS Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 342.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while WEYS trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check WEYS's competition here
WWW vs FWDI Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while FWDI trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check FWDI's competition here
WWW vs RCKY Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while RCKY trades at $38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check RCKY's competition here
WWW vs MAMK Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check MAMK's competition here
WWW vs VRA Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while VRA trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check VRA's competition here
WWW vs SORA Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while SORA trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check SORA's competition here
WWW vs FORD Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check FORD's competition here
WWW vs AREBW Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 501.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while AREBW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check AREBW's competition here
WWW vs AREB Comparison June 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.06, while AREB trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.87, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AREB's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check AREB's competition here