Embotelladora Andina S.A. (AKO-B) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AKO-B) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKO-B | $28.81 | +8.43% | 4.2B | 13.58 | $1.96 | N/A |
| KO | $82.16 | +3.29% | 350B | 25.58 | $3.18 | +2.46% |
| PEP | $143.26 | +1.83% | 195.2B | 22.41 | $6.37 | +3.98% |
| MNST | $92.08 | +4.08% | 88.2B | 43.55 | $2.07 | N/A |
| CCEP | $98.32 | +3.22% | 42.9B | 19.73 | $4.91 | +2.47% |
| KDP | $31.38 | +2.05% | 42.8B | 23.32 | $1.35 | +2.90% |
| KOF | $108.85 | +3.91% | 21.9B | -231.89 | -$0.45 | +3.94% |
| COKE | $184.56 | +3.22% | 14.5B | 25.39 | $7.29 | +0.52% |
| PRMB | $23.98 | +3.39% | 8.5B | 123.05 | $0.19 | +1.92% |
| CELH | $28.43 | +1.54% | 7.2B | 65.56 | $0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AKO-B vs KO Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 350B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while KO trades at $82.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check KO's competition here
AKO-B vs PEP Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 195.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while PEP trades at $143.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check PEP's competition here
AKO-B vs MNST Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while MNST trades at $92.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check MNST's competition here
AKO-B vs CCEP Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while CCEP trades at $98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check CCEP's competition here
AKO-B vs KDP Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while KDP trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check KDP's competition here
AKO-B vs KOF Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while KOF trades at $108.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -231.89. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check KOF's competition here
AKO-B vs COKE Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while COKE trades at $184.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check COKE's competition here
AKO-B vs PRMB Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while PRMB trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 123.05. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check PRMB's competition here
AKO-B vs CELH Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while CELH trades at $28.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 65.56. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check CELH's competition here
AKO-B vs COCO Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while COCO trades at $80.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 53.78. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check COCO's competition here
AKO-B vs PRMW Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check PRMW's competition here
AKO-B vs FIZZ Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while FIZZ trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check FIZZ's competition here
AKO-B vs AKO-A Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while AKO-A trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to AKO-A's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check AKO-A's competition here
AKO-B vs CHA Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while CHA trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check CHA's competition here
AKO-B vs SUJA Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 369.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while SUJA trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check SUJA's competition here
AKO-B vs OTLY Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while OTLY trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check OTLY's competition here
AKO-B vs ZVIA Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while ZVIA trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check ZVIA's competition here
AKO-B vs BUDA Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while BUDA trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check BUDA's competition here
AKO-B vs SHOT Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check SHOT's competition here
AKO-B vs BRFH Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while BRFH trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check BRFH's competition here
AKO-B vs REED Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while REED trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check REED's competition here
AKO-B vs BNKK Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while BNKK trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check BNKK's competition here
AKO-B vs BNKKW Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check BNKKW's competition here
AKO-B vs CRVP Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check CRVP's competition here
AKO-B vs NBEV Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check NBEV's competition here
AKO-B vs GMCR Comparison June 2026
AKO-B plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKO-B stands at 4.2B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKO-B is priced at $28.81, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKO-B currently has a P/E ratio of 13.58, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKO-B's ROE is N/A, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKO-B is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKO-B.Check GMCR's competition here