Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while AMZN trades at $259.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check AMZN's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while PDD trades at $83.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PDD's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while MELI trades at $1,510.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 41.06. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MELI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ORLY trades at $89.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ORLY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while EBAY trades at $121.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check EBAY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while AZO trades at $3,216.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check AZO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while SE trades at $75.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while JD trades at $29.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check JD's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while WSM trades at $254.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WSM's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while CPNG trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -37.91. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CPNG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ULTA trades at $644.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ULTA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while CASY trades at $687.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CASY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BBY trades at $99.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while TSCO trades at $36.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TSCO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while W trades at $111.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas W's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to W's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to W. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check W's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while FIVE trades at $240.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check FIVE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while GME trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GME's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while DKS trades at $140.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DKS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while MUSA trades at $521.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MUSA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while CHWY trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CHWY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ETSY trades at $89.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ETSY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while GLBE trades at $42.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 50.01. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GLBE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while VIPS trades at $13.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check VIPS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BBWI trades at $21.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBWI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ASO trades at $67.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ASO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while MNSO trades at $11.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MNSO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while WRBY trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 79.61. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WRBY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while AAP trades at $45.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check AAP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BOBS trades at $19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BOBS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while RH trades at $130.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RH's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check RH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OZON's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ARHS trades at $14.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ARHS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while SBH trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SBH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while SVV trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SVV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while RERE trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check RERE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while EYE trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check EYE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OLPX's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while LQDT trades at $43.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check LQDT's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while RVLV trades at $18.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check RVLV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while HZO trades at $52.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 188.21. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HZO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TANNI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 978.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while HEPS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HEPS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 944M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while WINA trades at $265.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WINA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ODP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ODP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OSTK's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 735.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while WOOF trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WOOF's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 657M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BWMX trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BWMX's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 574.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while EVGO trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check EVGO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BYON's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DADA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 445.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ARKO trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 53.87. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ARKO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 436.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BNED trades at $12.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BNED's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 414.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BBBY trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBBY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BBW trades at $29.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while JMIA trades at $5.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check JMIA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 311.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while CHPT trades at $11.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -48.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CHPT's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 278.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ELA trades at $10.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ELA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ELA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check FTCH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QRTEA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while DIBS trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -27.45. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DIBS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ZKH trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -33.07. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ZKH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BZUN trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BZUN's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while NEGG trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check NEGG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while TDUP trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TDUP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while FLWS trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check FLWS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ONEW trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ONEW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while PLBY trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -64.75. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PLBY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 150.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ABLV trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -54.39. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ABLV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check VLTA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check JMG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QRTEP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GOED's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, NXH has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while NXH trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas NXH's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NXH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to NXH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check NXH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check APRN's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while HTLM trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HTLM's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while GRWG trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GRWG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BARK trades at $9.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BARK's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while PRTS trades at $8.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PRTS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while PEW-WT trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PEW-WT's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OTH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while PEW trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to PEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PEW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QRTEB's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while HOUR trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 36.25. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HOUR's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ABLVW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CTIB's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while SPWH trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SPWH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check KIRK's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SSU's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BGFV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DTC's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while PETS trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PETS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to PETS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PETS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while LITB trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LITB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check LITB's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QVCGP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BBBYW has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BBBYW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BBBYW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBBYW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBBYW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBBYW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while TLF trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TLF's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while MOGU trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 179.90. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MOGU's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BOXD's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 262.5B. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $109.45 on the NYSE, while TCS trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 29.04, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TCS's competition here