Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while AMZN trades at $262.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check AMZN's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 120.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while PDD trades at $84.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PDD's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while MELI trades at $1,844.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 50.17. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MELI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ORLY trades at $91.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ORLY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while SE trades at $121.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while AZO trades at $3,025.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check AZO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while EBAY trades at $103.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check EBAY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while JD trades at $29.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check JD's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while CASY trades at $846.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CASY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while CPNG trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CPNG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while WSM trades at $241.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WSM's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ULTA trades at $510.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ULTA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while TSCO trades at $35.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TSCO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while GPC trades at $135.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GPC's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BBY trades at $86.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while DKS trades at $201.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DKS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while W trades at $101.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas W's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to W. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check W's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while FIVE trades at $244.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check FIVE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while MUSA trades at $569.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MUSA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while CHWY trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CHWY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while GME trades at $18.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GME's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ETSY trades at $79.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ETSY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while GLBE trades at $42.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 65.17. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GLBE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while VIPS trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check VIPS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BBWI trades at $19.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBWI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while MNSO trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MNSO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while RH trades at $181.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is similarly volatile compared to RH. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check RH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while AAP trades at $56.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check AAP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while WRBY trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 81.00. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WRBY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ASO trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ASO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BOBS trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BOBS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OZON's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while RVLV trades at $23.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check RVLV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while RERE trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check RERE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while SVV trades at $10.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SVV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while SBH trades at $16.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SBH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while EYE trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check EYE's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while CRI trades at $38.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CRI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OLPX's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while LQDT trades at $43.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check LQDT's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while WINA trades at $351.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WINA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while HZO trades at $52.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 185.86. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HZO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TANNI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 885.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while HEPS trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HEPS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ODP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 805.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while WOOF trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check WOOF's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OSTK's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 611.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BWMX trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BWMX's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BYON's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 544.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ARKO trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ARKO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 517.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while EVGO trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check EVGO's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DADA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BBW trades at $38.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 470M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ZKH trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -74.94. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ZKH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 420.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BNED trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BNED's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 413.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ELA trades at $16.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ELA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while TDUP trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TDUP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while NEGG trades at $18.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check NEGG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while JMIA trades at $6.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check JMIA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 325M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BBBY trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BBBY's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 260.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while FLWS trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check FLWS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check FTCH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QRTEA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, HITI has a market cap of 206.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while HITI trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas HITI's P/E ratio is 58.75. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HITI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to HITI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HITI's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ONEW trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ONEW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while DIBS trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -22.27. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DIBS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BZUN trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is similarly volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BZUN's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while CHPT trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CHPT's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check VLTA's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check JMG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QRTEP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GOED's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while GRWG trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check GRWG's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check APRN's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BARK trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -17.46. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BARK's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while PEW-WT trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PEW-WT's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while NPT trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -88.25. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check NPT's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while PEW trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to PEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PEW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while HOUR trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check HOUR's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check OTH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QRTEB's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while PRTS trades at $6.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PRTS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check CTIB's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while SPWH trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SPWH's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while PETS trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PETS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to PETS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check PETS's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check KIRK's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check SSU's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while ABLV trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check ABLV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BGFV's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check DTC's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while LITB trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check LITB's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while TBHC trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TBHC's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while TLF trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check TLF's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check QVCGP's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while MOGU trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check MOGU's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while NHTC trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -16.65. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check NHTC's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check BOXD's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE: BABA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA stands at 296.6B. In comparison, FRTT has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA is priced at $123.74 on the NYSE, while FRTT trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.82, whereas FRTT's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, BABA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRTT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA is less volatile compared to FRTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.Check FRTT's competition here