Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while AMZN trades at $259.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check AMZN's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 313B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BABA trades at $120.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BABA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while PDD trades at $88.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check PDD's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while MELI trades at $1,945.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check MELI's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ORLY trades at $89.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ORLY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while SE trades at $117.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check SE's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while AZO trades at $2,958.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check AZO's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while EBAY trades at $104.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check EBAY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while JD trades at $29.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check JD's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while CASY trades at $832.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check CASY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while CPNG trades at $16.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -37.84. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check CPNG's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while WSM trades at $236.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check WSM's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ULTA trades at $521.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ULTA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while TSCO trades at $35.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check TSCO's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while GPC trades at $134.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check GPC's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BBY trades at $87.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BBY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while DKS trades at $180.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check DKS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while W trades at $101.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas W's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to W. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check W's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while FIVE trades at $242.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check FIVE's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while CHWY trades at $23.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check CHWY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while GME trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check GME's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ETSY trades at $81.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ETSY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while VIPS trades at $14.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check VIPS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while GLBE trades at $40.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check GLBE's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BBWI trades at $19.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BBWI's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while MNSO trades at $11.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check MNSO's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while WRBY trades at $27.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 85.95. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check WRBY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while RH trades at $156.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to RH's ROE of +5.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check RH's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ASO trades at $45.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ASO's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while AAP trades at $42.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check AAP's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check OZON's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BOBS trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BOBS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while RVLV trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check RVLV's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while SVV trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check SVV's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while SBH trades at $16.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check SBH's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while RERE trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check RERE's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while EYE trades at $17.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check EYE's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check OLPX's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while CRI trades at $35.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check CRI's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while LQDT trades at $42.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check LQDT's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check TA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while WINA trades at $339.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check WINA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while HZO trades at $52.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 186.57. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check HZO's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check TANNI's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ODP's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 840.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while HEPS trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check HEPS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 813.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while WOOF trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check WOOF's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check OSTK's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 591.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BWMX trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BWMX's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BYON's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ARKO trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ARKO's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check DADA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 474.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BBW trades at $38.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BBW's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 469.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ZKH trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -74.81. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ZKH's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 458.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while EVGO trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check EVGO's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 416.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BNED trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BNED's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 411.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while JMIA trades at $6.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check JMIA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while NEGG trades at $18.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -27.27. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check NEGG's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 365.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ELA trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ELA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 354.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while TDUP trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check TDUP's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BBBY trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BBBY's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while FLWS trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check FLWS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check FTCH's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HITI has a market cap of 215.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while HITI trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas HITI's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to HITI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to HITI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check HITI's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check QRTEA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ONEW trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ONEW's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while DIBS trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -21.27. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check DIBS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 162.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BZUN trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BZUN's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check VLTA's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while CHPT trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check CHPT's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check JMG's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check QRTEP's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check GOED's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while GRWG trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check GRWG's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check APRN's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BARK trades at $10.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BARK's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while NPT trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -89.25. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check NPT's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while PEW trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to PEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check PEW's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while PEW-WT trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check PEW-WT's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check OTH's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while HOUR trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 60.33. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check HOUR's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while PRTS trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check PRTS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check QRTEB's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check CTIB's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while SPWH trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check SPWH's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while ABLV trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check ABLV's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while PETS trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to PETS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to PETS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check PETS's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check KIRK's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check SSU's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BGFV's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check DTC's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while LITB trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to LITB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check LITB's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while TLF trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check TLF's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while TBHC trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check TBHC's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check QVCGP's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while YJ trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to YJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check YJ's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while MOGU trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check MOGU's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while NHTC trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check NHTC's competition here

Murphy USA Inc. (NYSE: MUSA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MUSA stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MUSA is priced at $569.34 on the NYSE, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MUSA currently has a P/E ratio of 17.12, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MUSA's ROE is +0.95%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MUSA is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUSA.Check BOXD's competition here