Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CINF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINF | $169.25 | +4.31% | 25.3B | 9.37 | $17.49 | +2.13% |
| CB | $324.84 | +0.92% | 126.1B | 11.50 | $28.26 | +1.17% |
| PGR | $203.04 | +1.39% | 116.9B | 10.17 | $19.67 | +6.81% |
| TRV | $303.97 | +2.44% | 63.8B | 8.96 | $33.50 | +1.50% |
| ALL | $221.21 | +2.88% | 55.9B | 4.80 | $45.20 | +1.86% |
| ALL-PI | $18.77 | +0.86% | 55.4B | 1.55 | $12.04 | +1.86% |
| ALL-PJ | $26.07 | +0.08% | 55.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.86% |
| ALL-PB | $25.95 | +0.46% | 53.9B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.86% |
| ALL-PH | $20.06 | +0.85% | 49.7B | 3.39 | $5.90 | +1.86% |
| HIG | $129.41 | +1.42% | 35.4B | 9.08 | $14.21 | +1.79% |
Stock Comparison
CINF vs CB Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while CB trades at $324.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check CB's competition here
CINF vs PGR Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while PGR trades at $203.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check PGR's competition here
CINF vs TRV Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while TRV trades at $303.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check TRV's competition here
CINF vs ALL Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ALL trades at $221.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ALL's competition here
CINF vs ALL-PI Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ALL-PI trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ALL-PI's competition here
CINF vs ALL-PJ Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
CINF vs ALL-PB Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ALL-PB trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ALL-PB's competition here
CINF vs ALL-PH Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ALL-PH trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ALL-PH's competition here
CINF vs HIG Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while HIG trades at $129.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check HIG's competition here
CINF vs ALL-PG Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ALL-PG's competition here
CINF vs WRB Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while WRB trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check WRB's competition here
CINF vs WRB-PE Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while WRB-PE trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check WRB-PE's competition here
CINF vs WRB-PF Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while WRB-PF trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check WRB-PF's competition here
CINF vs WRB-PH Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while WRB-PH trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check WRB-PH's competition here
CINF vs MKL Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while MKL trades at $1,844.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check MKL's competition here
CINF vs L Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while L trades at $108.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check L's competition here
CINF vs HIG-PG Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while HIG-PG trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check HIG-PG's competition here
CINF vs CNA Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while CNA trades at $45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check CNA's competition here
CINF vs AFG Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AFG trades at $133.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AFG's competition here
CINF vs AXS Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AXS trades at $101.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AXS's competition here
CINF vs AXS-PE Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AXS-PE trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AXS-PE's competition here
CINF vs KNSL Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while KNSL trades at $311.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check KNSL's competition here
CINF vs THG Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while THG trades at $198.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check THG's competition here
CINF vs WRB-PG Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while WRB-PG trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check WRB-PG's competition here
CINF vs MCY Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while MCY trades at $100.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check MCY's competition here
CINF vs SIGI Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while SIGI trades at $92.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check SIGI's competition here
CINF vs SIGIP Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while SIGIP trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check SIGIP's competition here
CINF vs WTM Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while WTM trades at $2,018.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check WTM's competition here
CINF vs RLI Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while RLI trades at $54.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check RLI's competition here
CINF vs LMND Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while LMND trades at $60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -28.05. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check LMND's competition here
CINF vs HGTY Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while HGTY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 44.25. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check HGTY's competition here
CINF vs HGTY-WT Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
CINF vs AHL Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AHL's competition here
CINF vs PLMR Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while PLMR trades at $115.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check PLMR's competition here
CINF vs AHL-PD Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AHL-PD trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -80.04. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AHL-PD's competition here
CINF vs HCI Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while HCI trades at $163.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check HCI's competition here
CINF vs STC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while STC trades at $65.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check STC's competition here
CINF vs HMN Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while HMN trades at $49.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check HMN's competition here
CINF vs SLDE Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while SLDE trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check SLDE's competition here
CINF vs SKWD Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while SKWD trades at $51.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check SKWD's competition here
CINF vs AHL-PE Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AHL-PE trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -80.85. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AHL-PE's competition here
CINF vs AFGB Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AFGB trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AFGB's competition here
CINF vs AFGD Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AFGD trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AFGD's competition here
CINF vs AFGC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AFGC trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AFGC's competition here
CINF vs KMPR Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while KMPR trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check KMPR's competition here
CINF vs KMPB Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while KMPB trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check KMPB's competition here
CINF vs AFGE Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AFGE trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AFGE's competition here
CINF vs PRA Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while PRA trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check PRA's competition here
CINF vs UFCS Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while UFCS trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check UFCS's competition here
CINF vs ARGO Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ARGO's competition here
CINF vs UVE Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while UVE trades at $38.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check UVE's competition here
CINF vs SAFT Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while SAFT trades at $71.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check SAFT's competition here
CINF vs MHLA Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while MHLA trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check MHLA's competition here
CINF vs ASIC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 990.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ASIC trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ASIC's competition here
CINF vs BOW Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 859.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while BOW trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check BOW's competition here
CINF vs ROOT Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 755M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ROOT trades at $57.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ROOT's competition here
CINF vs DGICB Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 669.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while DGICB trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check DGICB's competition here
CINF vs HRTG Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 656.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while HRTG trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check HRTG's competition here
CINF vs DGICA Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while DGICA trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check DGICA's competition here
CINF vs ACIC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ACIC trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ACIC's competition here
CINF vs GBLI Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while GBLI trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check GBLI's competition here
CINF vs UIHC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check UIHC's competition here
CINF vs AII Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 328.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AII trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AII's competition here
CINF vs NODK Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 311.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while NODK trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -72.43. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check NODK's competition here
CINF vs PRHIZ Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while PRHIZ trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check PRHIZ's competition here
CINF vs KINS Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 228.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while KINS trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check KINS's competition here
CINF vs CNFR Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check CNFR's competition here
CINF vs CNFRZ Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check CNFRZ's competition here
CINF vs PRHI Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while PRHI trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check PRHI's competition here
CINF vs UNAM Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check UNAM's competition here
CINF vs ARGO-PA Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
CINF vs MILEW Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check MILEW's competition here
CINF vs AFSI Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AFSI's competition here
CINF vs FNHC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check FNHC's competition here
CINF vs AFHBL Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AFHBL's competition here
CINF vs Y Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check Y's competition here
CINF vs MILE Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check MILE's competition here
CINF vs ENH Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check ENH's competition here
CINF vs GFZ Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check GFZ's competition here
CINF vs CNFRL Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check CNFRL's competition here
CINF vs AHL-PC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check AHL-PC's competition here
CINF vs GBLIL Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check GBLIL's competition here
CINF vs STFC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check STFC's competition here
CINF vs NSEC Comparison June 2026
CINF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CINF stands at 25.3B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CINF is priced at $169.25, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CINF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.37, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, CINF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CINF is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CINF.Check NSEC's competition here