Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See KINS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for KINS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINS | $20.46 | +7.91% | 296.3M | 8.19 | $2.50 | +1.02% |
| CB | $365.02 | -1.78% | 139.5B | 13.05 | $27.97 | +1.09% |
| PGR | $227.77 | -2.32% | 132B | 12.54 | $18.17 | +6.06% |
| TRV | $395.20 | -1.91% | 81B | 10.68 | $37.02 | +1.19% |
| ALL-PI | $17.02 | +0.89% | 66.7B | 0.35 | $48.01 | +1.65% |
| ALL-PJ | $25.29 | -0.04% | 65.4B | 0.53 | $48.01 | +1.65% |
| ALL-PH | $18.12 | +0.22% | 65.1B | 0.38 | $48.01 | +1.65% |
| ALL-PB | $25.44 | +0.24% | 65.1B | 0.53 | $48.01 | +1.65% |
| ALL | $254.81 | -4.47% | 64.4B | 5.65 | $45.12 | +1.65% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
Chubb Limited (NYSE: CB)
KINS vs CB Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while CB trades at $365.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CB's competition here
The Progressive Corporation (NYSE: PGR)
KINS vs PGR Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while PGR trades at $227.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PGR's competition here
The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV)
KINS vs TRV Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while TRV trades at $395.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check TRV's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PI)
KINS vs ALL-PI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PI trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PJ)
KINS vs ALL-PJ Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PJ trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PH)
KINS vs ALL-PH Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PH trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PB)
KINS vs ALL-PB Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL)
KINS vs ALL Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ALL trades at $254.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL's competition here
The Allstate Corporation (NYSE: ALL-PG)
KINS vs ALL-PG Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
W.R. Berkley Corporation 4.25% (NYSE: WRB-PG)
KINS vs WRB-PG Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PG trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
W. R. Berkley Corporation 5.70% SB DB 2058 (NYSE: WRB-PE)
KINS vs WRB-PE Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PE trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: CINF)
KINS vs CINF Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while CINF trades at $185.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CINF's competition here
W. R. Berkley Corporation (NYSE: WRB)
KINS vs WRB Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while WRB trades at $75.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB's competition here
W.R. Berkley Corporation 5.10% (NYSE: WRB-PF)
KINS vs WRB-PF Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
W.R. Berkley Corporation 4.125% (NYSE: WRB-PH)
KINS vs WRB-PH Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while WRB-PH trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
Markel Corporation (NYSE: MKL)
KINS vs MKL Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while MKL trades at $1,939.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MKL's competition here
Loews Corporation (NYSE: L)
KINS vs L Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while L trades at $109.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check L's competition here
Everest Re Group, Ltd. (NYSE: RE)
KINS vs RE Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, RE has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while RE trades at $351.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RE's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to RE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check RE's competition here
Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat (NYSE: AIZN)
KINS vs AIZN Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AIZN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AIZN's competition here
Assurant, Inc. (NYSE: AIZ)
KINS vs AIZ Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AIZ trades at $307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AIZ's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFG)
KINS vs AFG Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AFG trades at $154.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFG's competition here
CNA Financial Corporation (NYSE: CNA)
KINS vs CNA Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while CNA trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNA's competition here
Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ: ERIE)
KINS vs ERIE Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ERIE trades at $273.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ERIE's competition here
Old Republic International Corporation (NYSE: ORI)
KINS vs ORI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ORI trades at $39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ORI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ORI's competition here
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: KNSL)
KINS vs KNSL Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while KNSL trades at $383.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KNSL's competition here
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE: THG)
KINS vs THG Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while THG trades at $242.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check THG's competition here
RLI Corp. (NYSE: RLI)
KINS vs RLI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while RLI trades at $68.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check RLI's competition here
Hagerty, Inc. (NYSE: HGTY)
KINS vs HGTY Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while HGTY trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 119.73. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY's competition here
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIGI)
KINS vs SIGI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while SIGI trades at $99.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGI's competition here
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIGIP)
KINS vs SIGIP Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while SIGIP trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGIP's competition here
Mercury General Corporation (NYSE: MCY)
KINS vs MCY Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while MCY trades at $82.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MCY's competition here
Accelerant Holdings (NYSE: ARX)
KINS vs ARX Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ARX trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ARX's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARX's competition here
Palomar Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLMR)
KINS vs PLMR Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while PLMR trades at $155.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PLMR's competition here
Hagerty, Inc. (NYSE: HGTY-WT)
KINS vs HGTY-WT Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited (NYSE: AHL)
KINS vs AHL Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL's competition here
Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE: LMND)
KINS vs LMND Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while LMND trades at $39.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -21.16. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to LMND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check LMND's competition here
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: SLDE)
KINS vs SLDE Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while SLDE trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SLDE's competition here
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKWD)
KINS vs SKWD Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while SKWD trades at $60.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SKWD's competition here
HCI Group, Inc. (NYSE: HCI)
KINS vs HCI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while HCI trades at $186.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HCI's competition here
Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRCH)
KINS vs PRCH Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, PRCH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while PRCH trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PRCH's P/E ratio is 246.44. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PRCH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRCH's competition here
Horace Mann Educators Corporation (NYSE: HMN)
KINS vs HMN Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while HMN trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HMN's competition here
Kemper Corporation 5.875% Fixed (NYSE: KMPB)
KINS vs KMPB Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while KMPB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is 43.95. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KMPB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPB's competition here
Kemper Corporation (NYSE: KMPR)
KINS vs KMPR Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while KMPR trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KMPR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPR's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGD)
KINS vs AFGD Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AFGD trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGD's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGB)
KINS vs AFGB Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AFGB trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGB's competition here
Trupanion, Inc. (NASDAQ: TRUP)
KINS vs TRUP Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while TRUP trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check TRUP's competition here
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAFT)
KINS vs SAFT Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while SAFT trades at $104.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SAFT's competition here
Stewart Information Services Corporation (NYSE: STC)
KINS vs STC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while STC trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STC's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGC)
KINS vs AFGC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AFGC trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGC's competition here
Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: UVE)
KINS vs UVE Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while UVE trades at $46.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UVE's competition here
ProAssurance Corporation (NYSE: PRA)
KINS vs PRA Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while PRA trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRA's competition here
American Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: AFGE)
KINS vs AFGE Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AFGE trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGE's competition here
United Fire Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: UFCS)
KINS vs UFCS Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while UFCS trades at $47.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UFCS's competition here
Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (NYSE: ASIC)
KINS vs ASIC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ASIC trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ASIC's competition here
Bowhead Specialty Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BOW)
KINS vs BOW Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while BOW trades at $34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to BOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check BOW's competition here
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. (NYSE: ARGO)
KINS vs ARGO Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO's competition here
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HRTG)
KINS vs HRTG Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 987.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while HRTG trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HRTG's competition here
Hippo Holdings Inc. (NYSE: HIPO)
KINS vs HIPO Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 929.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while HIPO trades at $34.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HIPO's competition here
Donegal Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DGICB)
KINS vs DGICB Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 840.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while DGICB trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICB's competition here
Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 6.625 NT 2046 (NYSE: MHLA)
KINS vs MHLA Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 788.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while MHLA trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MHLA's competition here
Donegal Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DGICA)
KINS vs DGICA Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 696M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while DGICA trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICA's competition here
Root, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROOT)
KINS vs ROOT Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 594M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ROOT trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ROOT's competition here
American Integrity Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE: AII)
KINS vs AII Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AII trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AII's competition here
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (NASDAQ: ACIC)
KINS vs ACIC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 474.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ACIC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACIC's competition here
Orion180 Insurance Group, Inc. Class A (NASDAQ: OIG)
KINS vs OIG Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while OIG trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check OIG's competition here
United Insurance Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: UIHC)
KINS vs UIHC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UIHC's competition here
Global Indemnity Group, LLC (NASDAQ: GBLI)
KINS vs GBLI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while GBLI trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLI's competition here
NI Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: NODK)
KINS vs NODK Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 311.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while NODK trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NODK's competition here
Presurance Holdings, Inc. 9.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: PRHIZ)
KINS vs PRHIZ Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while PRHIZ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHIZ's competition here
Presurance Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRHI)
KINS vs PRHI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while PRHI trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHI's competition here
Conifer Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNFR)
KINS vs CNFR Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFR's competition here
Conifer Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNFRZ)
KINS vs CNFRZ Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
Unico American Corporation (NASDAQ: UNAM)
KINS vs UNAM Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UNAM's competition here
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. (NYSE: ARGO-PA)
KINS vs ARGO-PA Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd (NYSE: ENH)
KINS vs ENH Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ENH's competition here
Alleghany Corporation (NYSE: Y)
KINS vs Y Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check Y's competition here
Metromile, Inc. (NASDAQ: MILE)
KINS vs MILE Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILE's competition here
Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AFHBL)
KINS vs AFHBL Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFHBL's competition here
FedNat Holding Company (NASDAQ: FNHC)
KINS vs FNHC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check FNHC's competition here
Conifer Holdings, Inc. - Senior (NASDAQ: CNFRL)
KINS vs CNFRL Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRL's competition here
Metromile, Inc. (NASDAQ: MILEW)
KINS vs MILEW Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILEW's competition here
American Financial Group (NYSE: GFZ)
KINS vs GFZ Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GFZ's competition here
State Auto Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: STFC)
KINS vs STFC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STFC's competition here
The National Security Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NSEC)
KINS vs NSEC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NSEC's competition here
Global Indemnity Limited SUB NT 47 (NASDAQ: GBLIL)
KINS vs GBLIL Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLIL's competition here
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: AFSI)
KINS vs AFSI Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFSI's competition here
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited (NYSE: AHL-PC)
KINS vs AHL-PC Comparison November 2026
Kingstone Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: KINS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 296.3M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $20.46 on the NASDAQ, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PC's competition here