Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while LIN trades at $523.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check LIN's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while SHW trades at $320.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check SHW's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ECL trades at $264.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ECL's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while APD trades at $284.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check APD's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while PPG trades at $119.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check PPG's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while SQM trades at $84.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check SQM's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while IFF trades at $78.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check IFF's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while DD trades at $48.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 123.84. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check DD's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ALB trades at $173.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -44.68. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ALB's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while RPM trades at $108.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check RPM's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while SOLS trades at $83.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 68.03. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check SOLS's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while WLK trades at $88.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check WLK's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ESI trades at $43.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 66.58. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ESI's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while SSL trades at $13.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check SSL's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while NEU trades at $829.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check NEU's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while AXTA trades at $33.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check AXTA's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ALTM trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ALTM's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while IKNX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check IKNX's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while PRM trades at $35.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -25.40. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check PRM's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while BCPC trades at $165.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check BCPC's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while SXT trades at $124.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check SXT's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while CBT trades at $86.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check CBT's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while FUL trades at $63.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check FUL's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while AVNT trades at $37.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check AVNT's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while HWKN trades at $159.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check HWKN's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while CC trades at $22.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check CC's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while LTHM trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check LTHM's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while WDFC trades at $224.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check WDFC's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ASH trades at $65.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ASH's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while OLN trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check OLN's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while KWR trades at $145.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 549.77. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check KWR's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while NGVT trades at $72.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check NGVT's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while MTX trades at $78.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check MTX's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while IOSP trades at $87.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check IOSP's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while PQG trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check PQG's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while REX trades at $43.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check REX's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while LWLG trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -58.81. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check LWLG's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ECVT trades at $13.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 75.24. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ECVT's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ODC trades at $97.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ODC's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while CCF trades at $127.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check CCF's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while SCL trades at $54.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is -84.52. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check SCL's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while GPRE trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -82.22. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check GPRE's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while KOP trades at $43.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check KOP's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 751.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while KRO trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check KRO's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while OEC trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check OEC's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ALTO trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ALTO's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while GEVO trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check GEVO's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 233.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while HDSN trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check HDSN's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while FSI trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 104.33. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check FSI's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while NTIC trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -89.00. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check NTIC's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while LOOP trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check LOOP's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while VNTR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check VNTR's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while YMAT trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check YMAT's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while SNES trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check SNES's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while GURE trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check GURE's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while TSE trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check TSE's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while CNEY trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check CNEY's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while CRKN trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check CRKN's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while HGASW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check HGASW's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while MOOV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMT has daily volatility of 3.84 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, KMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while KMG trades at $76.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas KMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KMG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to KMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check KMG's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ZY trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ZY's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while GCP trades at $32.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check GCP's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while FOE trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check FOE's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while ARG trades at $142.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check ARG's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check AVTR-PA's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while KRA trades at $46.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check KRA's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while AMRS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check AMRS's competition here

CMT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CMT stands at 206.8M. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMT is priced at $24.77, while TREC trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CMT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.94, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMT is more volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMT.Check TREC's competition here