KMG Chemicals, Inc. (KMG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMG | $76.14 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +0.16% |
| LIN | $523.01 | +4.20% | 238.5B | 34.24 | $15.06 | +1.22% |
| SHW | $320.88 | +7.12% | 76.6B | 29.83 | $10.41 | +1.05% |
| ECL | $264.57 | +2.78% | 74.4B | 35.83 | $7.38 | +1.07% |
| APD | $284.37 | +2.74% | 63B | 29.82 | $9.49 | +2.60% |
| PPG | $119.73 | +6.06% | 25.9B | 16.67 | $6.98 | +2.51% |
| SQM | $84.65 | +16.34% | 21.6B | 26.45 | $2.86 | +1.37% |
| IFF | $78.45 | +8.06% | 19.3B | 23.46 | $3.23 | +2.16% |
| DD | $48.02 | +2.19% | 19.3B | 123.84 | $0.38 | +1.71% |
| ALB | $173.49 | +15.78% | 18B | -44.68 | -$3.42 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
KMG vs LIN Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while LIN trades at $523.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check LIN's competition here
KMG vs SHW Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while SHW trades at $320.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check SHW's competition here
KMG vs ECL Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ECL trades at $264.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ECL's competition here
KMG vs APD Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while APD trades at $284.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check APD's competition here
KMG vs PPG Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while PPG trades at $119.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check PPG's competition here
KMG vs SQM Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while SQM trades at $84.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SQM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check SQM's competition here
KMG vs IFF Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while IFF trades at $78.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check IFF's competition here
KMG vs DD Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while DD trades at $48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 123.84. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check DD's competition here
KMG vs ALB Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ALB trades at $173.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -44.68. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ALB's competition here
KMG vs RPM Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, RPM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while RPM trades at $108.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPM's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RPM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to RPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check RPM's competition here
KMG vs SOLS Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, SOLS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while SOLS trades at $83.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLS's P/E ratio is 68.03. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOLS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to SOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check SOLS's competition here
KMG vs WLK Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while WLK trades at $88.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WLK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check WLK's competition here
KMG vs ESI Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ESI trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 66.58. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ESI's competition here
KMG vs SSL Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while SSL trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check SSL's competition here
KMG vs NEU Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while NEU trades at $829.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check NEU's competition here
KMG vs AXTA Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while AXTA trades at $33.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check AXTA's competition here
KMG vs ALTM Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ALTM's competition here
KMG vs IKNX Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check IKNX's competition here
KMG vs PRM Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while PRM trades at $35.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -25.40. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check PRM's competition here
KMG vs BCPC Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while BCPC trades at $165.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check BCPC's competition here
KMG vs SXT Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while SXT trades at $124.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check SXT's competition here
KMG vs CBT Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while CBT trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check CBT's competition here
KMG vs FUL Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while FUL trades at $63.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check FUL's competition here
KMG vs AVNT Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while AVNT trades at $37.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check AVNT's competition here
KMG vs HWKN Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while HWKN trades at $159.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check HWKN's competition here
KMG vs CC Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while CC trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CC's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CC's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check CC's competition here
KMG vs LTHM Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check LTHM's competition here
KMG vs WDFC Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while WDFC trades at $224.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check WDFC's competition here
KMG vs ASH Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ASH trades at $65.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ASH's competition here
KMG vs OLN Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while OLN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check OLN's competition here
KMG vs KWR Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while KWR trades at $145.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 549.77. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check KWR's competition here
KMG vs NGVT Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while NGVT trades at $72.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check NGVT's competition here
KMG vs MTX Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while MTX trades at $78.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check MTX's competition here
KMG vs IOSP Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while IOSP trades at $87.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check IOSP's competition here
KMG vs PQG Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check PQG's competition here
KMG vs REX Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while REX trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check REX's competition here
KMG vs LWLG Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while LWLG trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -58.81. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check LWLG's competition here
KMG vs ECVT Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ECVT trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is 75.24. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ECVT's competition here
KMG vs ODC Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ODC trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ODC's competition here
KMG vs CCF Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check CCF's competition here
KMG vs SCL Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while SCL trades at $54.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is -84.52. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check SCL's competition here
KMG vs GPRE Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while GPRE trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -82.22. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check GPRE's competition here
KMG vs KOP Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while KOP trades at $43.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check KOP's competition here
KMG vs KRO Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 751.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while KRO trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KRO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check KRO's competition here
KMG vs OEC Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while OEC trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check OEC's competition here
KMG vs ALTO Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ALTO trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ALTO's competition here
KMG vs GEVO Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while GEVO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check GEVO's competition here
KMG vs HDSN Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 233.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while HDSN trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check HDSN's competition here
KMG vs CMT Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while CMT trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check CMT's competition here
KMG vs FSI Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while FSI trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 104.33. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check FSI's competition here
KMG vs NTIC Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while NTIC trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is -89.00. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NTIC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check NTIC's competition here
KMG vs LOOP Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while LOOP trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOOP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check LOOP's competition here
KMG vs VNTR Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check VNTR's competition here
KMG vs YMAT Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, YMAT has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while YMAT trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMAT's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YMAT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to YMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check YMAT's competition here
KMG vs SNES Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while SNES trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check SNES's competition here
KMG vs GURE Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while GURE trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check GURE's competition here
KMG vs TSE Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while TSE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check TSE's competition here
KMG vs CNEY Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while CNEY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check CNEY's competition here
KMG vs CRKN Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 434.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while CRKN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check CRKN's competition here
KMG vs HGASW Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HGASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG and HGASW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGASW's competition here
KMG vs MOOV Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KMG has daily volatility of 0.00 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.Check MOOV's competition here
KMG vs ZY Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ZY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ZY trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZY's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ZY's competition here
KMG vs GCP Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, GCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while GCP trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCP's P/E ratio is 177.83. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to GCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check GCP's competition here
KMG vs FOE Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, FOE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while FOE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FOE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to FOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check FOE's competition here
KMG vs ARG Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, ARG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while ARG trades at $142.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to ARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check ARG's competition here
KMG vs AVTR-PA Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, AVTR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while AVTR-PA trades at $90.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVTR-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVTR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to AVTR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check AVTR-PA's competition here
KMG vs KRA Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, KRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while KRA trades at $46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KRA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to KRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check KRA's competition here
KMG vs AMRS Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, AMRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while AMRS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMRS's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to AMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check AMRS's competition here
KMG vs TREC Comparison June 2026
KMG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMG stands at 0. In comparison, TREC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMG is priced at $76.14, while TREC trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMG's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TREC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMG is less volatile compared to TREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMG.Check TREC's competition here