Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EPAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | $35.43 | +2.73% | 1.8B | 22.04 | $1.59 | +0.12% |
| ETN | $394.69 | -2.10% | 156B | 39.31 | $10.22 | +1.14% |
| PH | $903.45 | +2.30% | 114.2B | 33.40 | $27.11 | +0.85% |
| CMI | $664.68 | -1.19% | 92.3B | 34.73 | $19.27 | +1.27% |
| JCI | $145.55 | +1.04% | 90.1B | 45.05 | $3.28 | +1.13% |
| EMR | $143.73 | +3.35% | 79.8B | 32.97 | $4.32 | +1.60% |
| ITW | $256.56 | +1.65% | 73.8B | 23.80 | $10.78 | +2.53% |
| PCAR | $118.88 | +0.37% | 63B | 25.47 | $4.70 | +2.40% |
| CARR | $69.81 | +3.66% | 59.2B | 47.49 | $1.50 | +1.37% |
| ROK | $462.61 | +2.42% | 51.2B | 47.72 | $9.65 | +1.24% |
Stock Comparison
EPAC vs ETN Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while ETN trades at $394.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ETN's competition here
EPAC vs PH Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while PH trades at $903.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PH's competition here
EPAC vs CMI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CMI trades at $664.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CMI's competition here
EPAC vs JCI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while JCI trades at $145.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JCI's competition here
EPAC vs EMR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while EMR trades at $143.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check EMR's competition here
EPAC vs ITW Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while ITW trades at $256.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITW's competition here
EPAC vs PCAR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while PCAR trades at $118.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PCAR's competition here
EPAC vs CARR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CARR trades at $69.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 47.49. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CARR's competition here
EPAC vs ROK Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while ROK trades at $462.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 47.72. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ROK's competition here
EPAC vs DOV Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while DOV trades at $219.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DOV's competition here
EPAC vs IR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while IR trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 49.94. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IR's competition here
EPAC vs OTIS Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while OTIS trades at $70.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OTIS's competition here
EPAC vs SYM Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while SYM trades at $42.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -531.50. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SYM's competition here
EPAC vs XYL Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while XYL trades at $109.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XYL's competition here
EPAC vs INIO Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while INIO trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 259.38. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INIO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check INIO's competition here
EPAC vs P Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while P trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas P's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to P's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check P's competition here
EPAC vs MAIR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while MAIR trades at $40.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 115.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MAIR's competition here
EPAC vs FTV Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while FTV trades at $60.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FTV's competition here
EPAC vs ITT Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while ITT trades at $188.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITT's competition here
EPAC vs IEX Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while IEX trades at $218.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IEX's competition here
EPAC vs NDSN Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while NDSN trades at $288.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NDSN's competition here
EPAC vs GNRC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GNRC trades at $262.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 80.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GNRC's competition here
EPAC vs RRX Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while RRX trades at $213.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 49.72. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RRX's competition here
EPAC vs GGG Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GGG trades at $74.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GGG's competition here
EPAC vs PNR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while PNR trades at $74.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PNR's competition here
EPAC vs CR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CR trades at $208.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CR's competition here
EPAC vs SPXC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while SPXC trades at $229.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SPXC's competition here
EPAC vs WTS Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while WTS trades at $326.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WTS's competition here
EPAC vs DCI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while DCI trades at $86.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DCI's competition here
EPAC vs GTLS Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GTLS trades at $206.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is -205.24. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS's competition here
EPAC vs FLS Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while FLS trades at $79.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FLS's competition here
EPAC vs AOS Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while AOS trades at $59.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AOS's competition here
EPAC vs OSK Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while OSK trades at $134.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OSK's competition here
EPAC vs MIDD Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while MIDD trades at $158.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIDD's competition here
EPAC vs NPO Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while NPO trades at $337.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 161.49. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPO's competition here
EPAC vs GTES Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GTES trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTES's competition here
EPAC vs AEBIV Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AEBIV's competition here
EPAC vs JBTM Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while JBTM trades at $125.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBTM's competition here
EPAC vs PSN Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while PSN trades at $57.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PSN's competition here
EPAC vs CSWI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CSWI's competition here
EPAC vs CSW Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CSW trades at $278.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CSW's competition here
EPAC vs FELE Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while FELE trades at $102.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FELE's competition here
EPAC vs MIR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while MIR trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 170.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIR's competition here
EPAC vs XMTR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while XMTR trades at $87.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -79.44. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XMTR's competition here
EPAC vs MWA Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while MWA trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MWA's competition here
EPAC vs AIMC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIMC's competition here
EPAC vs JBT Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBT's competition here
EPAC vs SXI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while SXI trades at $306.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SXI's competition here
EPAC vs KAI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while KAI trades at $288.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KAI's competition here
EPAC vs GTLS-PB Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
EPAC vs HLIO Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while HLIO trades at $84.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 46.05. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HLIO's competition here
EPAC vs ATS Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while ATS trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 52.96. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ATS's competition here
EPAC vs BW-PA Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while BW-PA trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 80.84. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW-PA's competition here
EPAC vs MIR-WT Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIR-WT's competition here
EPAC vs HI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HI's competition here
EPAC vs CXT Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CXT trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CXT's competition here
EPAC vs GRC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GRC trades at $83.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GRC's competition here
EPAC vs CFX Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CFX's competition here
EPAC vs SHPW Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHPW's competition here
EPAC vs THR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while THR trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 44.96. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check THR's competition here
EPAC vs CYD Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CYD trades at $48.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CYD's competition here
EPAC vs AMSC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while AMSC trades at $40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AMSC's competition here
EPAC vs BW Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while BW trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -17.60. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW's competition here
EPAC vs TNC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while TNC trades at $88.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TNC's competition here
EPAC vs BLDP Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while BLDP trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BLDP's competition here
EPAC vs GHM Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GHM trades at $104.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 89.54. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GHM's competition here
EPAC vs CIR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CIR's competition here
EPAC vs NNE Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 995.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while NNE trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -35.21. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NNE's competition here
EPAC vs PSIX Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 902.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while PSIX trades at $42.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PSIX's competition here
EPAC vs KRNT Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 725.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while KRNT trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -41.18. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KRNT's competition here
EPAC vs PKOH Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 482.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while PKOH trades at $34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PKOH's competition here
EPAC vs LXFR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 473.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while LXFR trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LXFR's competition here
EPAC vs SERV Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 462.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while SERV trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SERV's competition here
EPAC vs RR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 422.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while RR trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -17.69. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RR's competition here
EPAC vs XE Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 408.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while XE trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XE's competition here
EPAC vs BGRY Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BGRY's competition here
EPAC vs AIRJ Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 320.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while AIRJ trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIRJ's competition here
EPAC vs OFLX Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 314.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while OFLX trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OFLX's competition here
EPAC vs TWIN Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while TWIN trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TWIN's competition here
EPAC vs SHMD Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 213.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while SHMD trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMD's competition here
EPAC vs HUHU Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while HUHU trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HUHU's competition here
EPAC vs TAYD Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 176.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while TAYD trades at $55.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TAYD's competition here
EPAC vs NPWR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while NPWR trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPWR's competition here
EPAC vs HURC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while HURC trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HURC's competition here
EPAC vs HDRN Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while HDRN trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HDRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HDRN's competition here
EPAC vs BWEN Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while BWEN trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BWEN's competition here
EPAC vs AIRJW Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while AIRJW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIRJW's competition here
EPAC vs SHMDW Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while SHMDW trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMDW's competition here
EPAC vs PYR Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PYR's competition here
EPAC vs LASE Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while LASE trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LASE's ROE of -6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LASE's competition here
EPAC vs CVV Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CVV trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CVV's competition here
EPAC vs XCH Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while XCH trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XCH's competition here
EPAC vs BURU Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while BURU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BURU's competition here
EPAC vs GTEC Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while GTEC trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTEC's competition here
EPAC vs WFF Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while WFF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WFF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WFF's competition here
EPAC vs HDRNW Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HDRNW has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while HDRNW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas HDRNW's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HDRNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HDRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HDRNW's competition here
EPAC vs HCAI Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while HCAI trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HCAI's competition here
EPAC vs JCSE Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while JCSE trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JCSE's competition here
EPAC vs CGRN Comparison June 2026
EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $35.43, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 22.04, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CGRN's competition here