Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 205B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GEV trades at $774.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GEV's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PH trades at $917.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PH's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while EMR trades at $162.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check EMR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while TT trades at $401.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TT's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ITW trades at $280.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ITW's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while HON trades at $220.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HON's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while CMI trades at $450.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CMI's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PCAR trades at $101.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PCAR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while CARR trades at $52.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CARR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CARR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ROK trades at $375.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ROK's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while OTIS trades at $78.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check OTIS's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while DOV trades at $203.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check DOV's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while XYL trades at $97.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check XYL's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while SYM trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SYM's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ITT trades at $205.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ITT's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while NDSN trades at $309.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NDSN's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while IEX trades at $226.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check IEX's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while LII trades at $341.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check LII's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while CR trades at $201.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while WTS trades at $346.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check WTS's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MAIR trades at $23.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 46.98. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MAIR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while RRX trades at $169.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check RRX's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GGG trades at $67.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GGG's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PNR trades at $68.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PNR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GNRC trades at $176.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GNRC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while INIO trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 105.73. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INIO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check INIO's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while FLS trades at $80.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check FLS's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GTLS trades at $209.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GTLS's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while DCI trades at $84.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check DCI's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while AOS trades at $64.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AOS's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ZWS trades at $43.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ZWS's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MIDDV's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while JBTM trades at $128.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check JBTM's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AEBIV's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while TEX trades at $54.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TEX's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MIDD trades at $136.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MIDD's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GTES trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GTES's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while NPO trades at $258.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NPO's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ESAB trades at $82.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ESAB's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MOD trades at $96.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MOD's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CSWI's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while AAON trades at $57.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AAON's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while BMI trades at $158.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BMI's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ALH trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ALH's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MIR trades at $17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MIR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while FELE trades at $94.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check FELE's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check AIMC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check JBT's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MWA trades at $24.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MWA's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while KAI trades at $292.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check KAI's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while CXT trades at $57.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CXT's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while SXI trades at $228.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SXI's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MIR-WT's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while HI trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HI's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CFX's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SHPW's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while EPAC trades at $38.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check EPAC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MFP trades at $42.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is 117.74. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MFP's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GRC trades at $67.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to GRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GRC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ATS trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ATS's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ALG trades at $133.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ALG's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MFPVV's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while HLIO trades at $47.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HLIO's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while BW-PA trades at $17.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BW-PA's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while TNC trades at $71.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TNC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 914.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GHM trades at $78.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 54.13. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GHM's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 902.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PSIX trades at $39.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PSIX's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 838.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PLOW trades at $36.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PLOW's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 821.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while ASTE trades at $35.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check ASTE's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 806.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while MTW trades at $22.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 63.90. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check MTW's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 784.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while KODK trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check KODK's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 724M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while KRNT trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check KRNT's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 632.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PKOH trades at $43.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PKOH's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 509.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while CMCO trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check CMCO's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 509M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while HY trades at $28.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HY's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 484.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while BW trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BW's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 463.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while LXFR trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check LXFR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BGRY's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 331.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while TWIN trades at $22.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TWIN's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while SERV trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SERV's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while GENC trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check GENC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 242.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while OFLX trades at $23.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check OFLX's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PPIH trades at $28.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PPIH's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while XE trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check XE's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 208.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while BNC trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to BNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BNC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 184.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while TAYD trades at $56.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TAYD's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 179.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while VELO trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check VELO's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 164.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while RR trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check RR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while SHMD trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SHMD's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while HURC trades at $20.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -19.64. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check HURC's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, NANO has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while NANO trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas NANO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NANO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to NANO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NANO's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while FISN trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to FISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check FISN's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while BWNB trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check BWNB's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, TRBG has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while TRBG trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas TRBG's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to TRBG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check TRBG's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while NPWR trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check NPWR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while KULR trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check KULR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check PYR's competition here

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE: IR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IR stands at 31.9B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IR is priced at $82.99 on the NYSE, while SOTK trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.67, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, IR's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IR is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IR.Check SOTK's competition here