EngageSmart, Inc. (ESMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ESMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESMT | $23.05 | -0.09% | 3.9B | 153.67 | $0.15 | N/A |
| MSFT | $384.25 | -6.68% | 3T | 24.01 | $16.80 | +0.90% |
| ORCL | $181.50 | -14.31% | 591.8B | 36.94 | $5.57 | +0.99% |
| PLTR | $128.45 | -5.88% | 303.2B | 148.39 | $0.89 | N/A |
| PANW | $279.61 | +4.99% | 177.5B | 232.61 | $1.12 | N/A |
| CRWD | $691.63 | +4.98% | 164.2B | -4961.00 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| FTNT | $144.49 | +1.01% | 101.4B | 53.64 | $2.58 | N/A |
| SNPS | $454.33 | -4.04% | 89.1B | 106.47 | $4.37 | N/A |
| NET | $225.61 | -8.95% | 83.4B | -944.32 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ESMT vs MSFT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while MSFT trades at $384.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check MSFT's competition here
ESMT vs ORCL Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 591.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ORCL trades at $181.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check ORCL's competition here
ESMT vs PLTR Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 303.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PLTR trades at $128.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 148.39. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PLTR's competition here
ESMT vs PANW Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 177.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PANW trades at $279.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 232.61. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PANW's competition here
ESMT vs CRWD Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 164.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CRWD trades at $691.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -4961.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CRWD's competition here
ESMT vs FTNT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FTNT trades at $144.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 53.64. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check FTNT's competition here
ESMT vs SNPS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SNPS trades at $454.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 106.47. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SNPS's competition here
ESMT vs NET Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NET trades at $225.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -944.32. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check NET's competition here
ESMT vs VMW Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check VMW's competition here
ESMT vs CRWV Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CRWV trades at $101.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -36.19. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CRWV's competition here
ESMT vs SQ Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SQ's competition here
ESMT vs XYZ Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while XYZ trades at $69.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 53.34. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check XYZ's competition here
ESMT vs TWLO Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TWLO trades at $202.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 310.14. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check TWLO's competition here
ESMT vs NETE Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check NETE's competition here
ESMT vs MDB Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while MDB trades at $350.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -972.23. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check MDB's competition here
ESMT vs SPLK Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SPLK's competition here
ESMT vs VRSN Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while VRSN trades at $280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check VRSN's competition here
ESMT vs CPAY Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CPAY trades at $353.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CPAY's competition here
ESMT vs FFIV Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FFIV trades at $395.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check FFIV's competition here
ESMT vs AFRM Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AFRM trades at $65.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 59.19. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check AFRM's competition here
ESMT vs FLT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check FLT's competition here
ESMT vs CYBR Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CYBR's competition here
ESMT vs ZS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ZS trades at $127.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -267.74. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check ZS's competition here
ESMT vs AKAM Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AKAM trades at $131.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 46.40. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check AKAM's competition here
ESMT vs OKTA Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while OKTA trades at $116.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 86.93. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check OKTA's competition here
ESMT vs IOT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while IOT trades at $32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 336.20. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check IOT's competition here
ESMT vs DOCN Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DOCN trades at $174.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 74.15. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check DOCN's competition here
ESMT vs GEN Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GEN trades at $24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check GEN's competition here
ESMT vs KSPI Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while KSPI trades at $82.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check KSPI's competition here
ESMT vs RBRK Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while RBRK trades at $69.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -49.14. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check RBRK's competition here
ESMT vs TOST Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TOST trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check TOST's competition here
ESMT vs NLOK Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check NLOK's competition here
ESMT vs NTNX Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NTNX trades at $48.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 53.41. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check NTNX's competition here
ESMT vs CHKP Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CHKP trades at $122.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CHKP's competition here
ESMT vs CFLT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CFLT trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CFLT's competition here
ESMT vs GDDY Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GDDY trades at $73.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check GDDY's competition here
ESMT vs PAYP Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PAYP trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PAYP's competition here
ESMT vs ALTR Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check ALTR's competition here
ESMT vs PLAN Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PLAN's competition here
ESMT vs SAIL Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SAIL trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -62.64. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SAIL's competition here
ESMT vs CORZ Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CORZ trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CORZ's competition here
ESMT vs CORZZ Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CORZZ trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CORZZ's competition here
ESMT vs INFA Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check INFA's competition here
ESMT vs HCP Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check HCP's competition here
ESMT vs DBX Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DBX trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check DBX's competition here
ESMT vs JCOM Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check JCOM's competition here
ESMT vs SQSP Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SQSP's competition here
ESMT vs CORZW Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CORZW trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CORZW's competition here
ESMT vs DOX Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DOX trades at $56.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check DOX's competition here
ESMT vs KLAR Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while KLAR trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -31.73. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check KLAR's competition here
ESMT vs NEWR Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check NEWR's competition here
ESMT vs PATH Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PATH trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PATH's competition here
ESMT vs CCCS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CCCS's competition here
ESMT vs BB Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while BB trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 98.22. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check BB's competition here
ESMT vs WEX Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while WEX trades at $135.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check WEX's competition here
ESMT vs S Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while S trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas S's P/E ratio is -15.71. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to S's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check S's competition here
ESMT vs NVEI Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check NVEI's competition here
ESMT vs KVYO Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while KVYO trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -492.67. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check KVYO's competition here
ESMT vs ACIW Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ACIW trades at $44.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check ACIW's competition here
ESMT vs BLSH Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while BLSH trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check BLSH's competition here
ESMT vs RELY Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while RELY trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check RELY's competition here
ESMT vs QLYS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while QLYS trades at $113.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check QLYS's competition here
ESMT vs VRNS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while VRNS trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -28.74. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check VRNS's competition here
ESMT vs DLO Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DLO trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check DLO's competition here
ESMT vs FOUR Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FOUR trades at $40.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check FOUR's competition here
ESMT vs CLBT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CLBT trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 46.36. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CLBT's competition here
ESMT vs SWI Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SWI's competition here
ESMT vs TDC Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TDC trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check TDC's competition here
ESMT vs EVOP Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check EVOP's competition here
ESMT vs TENB Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TENB trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -266.90. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check TENB's competition here
ESMT vs NTCT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NTCT trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check NTCT's competition here
ESMT vs CCC Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CCC trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 79.17. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CCC's competition here
ESMT vs WIX Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while WIX trades at $45.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is -66.97. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check WIX's competition here
ESMT vs STNE Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while STNE trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check STNE's competition here
ESMT vs PAGS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PAGS trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PAGS's competition here
ESMT vs EEFT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EEFT trades at $66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check EEFT's competition here
ESMT vs CSGS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CSGS trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check CSGS's competition here
ESMT vs RAMP Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while RAMP trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check RAMP's competition here
ESMT vs AVPT Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AVPT trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 52.90. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check AVPT's competition here
ESMT vs ATEN Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ATEN trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 50.74. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check ATEN's competition here
ESMT vs PAYO Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PAYO trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PAYO's competition here
ESMT vs AVDX Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check AVDX's competition here
ESMT vs GETVV Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check GETVV's competition here
ESMT vs BAND Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while BAND trades at $63.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is -166.74. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check BAND's competition here
ESMT vs SPSC Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SPSC trades at $54.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SPSC's competition here
ESMT vs WRD Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while WRD trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check WRD's competition here
ESMT vs FORG Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check FORG's competition here
ESMT vs GSKY Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check GSKY's competition here
ESMT vs GET Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check GET's competition here
ESMT vs MQ Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while MQ trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 397.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check MQ's competition here
ESMT vs STER Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT and STER have similar daily volatility (0.24).Check STER's competition here
ESMT vs EVCM Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EVCM trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is 69.23. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check EVCM's competition here
ESMT vs ZUO Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check ZUO's competition here
ESMT vs SUMO Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check SUMO's competition here
ESMT vs GB Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check GB's competition here
ESMT vs EVTC Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EVTC trades at $26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check EVTC's competition here
ESMT vs BASE Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while BASE trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check BASE's competition here
ESMT vs PAYA Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PAYA's competition here
ESMT vs PICS Comparison June 2026
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PICS trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.Check PICS's competition here