F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while MSFT trades at $530.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MSFT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 368.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PLTR trades at $160.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 133.62. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PLTR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 350.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while ORCL trades at $116.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ORCL's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 256.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PANW trades at $313.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 83.44. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PANW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 222B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CRWD trades at $216.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is 210.99. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRWD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CRWD's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NET trades at $268.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NET's P/E ratio is 265.96. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NET's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while FTNT trades at $118.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FTNT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while SNPS trades at $450.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 33.59. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SNPS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check VMW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SQ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while XYZ trades at $85.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check XYZ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while ZS trades at $197.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is 50.17. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ZS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while TWLO trades at $202.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TWLO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CPAY trades at $455.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CPAY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while OKTA trades at $168.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check OKTA's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NETE's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while VRSN trades at $308.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check VRSN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SPLK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CRWV trades at $46.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CRWV's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while MDB trades at $312.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is 59.14. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MDB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while IOT trades at $40.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is 66.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IOT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check IOT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FLT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while RBRK trades at $105.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 391.63. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RBRK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CYBR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while TOST trades at $34.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TOST's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GEN trades at $29.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GEN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while KSPI trades at $91.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check KSPI's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NTNX trades at $58.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NTNX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GENVR has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GENVR trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GENVR's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GENVR's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GENVR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GENVR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CHKP trades at $144.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CHKP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GDDY trades at $114.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +12.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GDDY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NLOK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while AKAM trades at $83.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check AKAM's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CFLT trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CFLT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while SAIL trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is 68.57. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SAIL's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PAYP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PAYP trades at $14.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PAYP's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAYP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PAYP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PAYP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ALTR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PLAN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NTSK trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -23.13. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTSK's ROE of -4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NTSK's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while DOCN trades at $72.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DOCN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DOCN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INFA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check INFA's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while DBX trades at $34.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DBX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while S trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas S's P/E ratio is 98.93. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to S's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to S. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check S's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check HCP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PATH trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PATH's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check JCOM's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while QLYS trades at $190.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check QLYS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SQSP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NEWR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while ACIW trades at $60.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ACIW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while WEX trades at $182.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check WEX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, MBGL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while MBGL trades at $19.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas MBGL's P/E ratio is 46.76. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MBGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to MBGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MBGL's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while BOX trades at $41.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BOX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CCCS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while VRNS trades at $48.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is 212.17. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check VRNS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while BB trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 45.92. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NVEI's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while RELY trades at $22.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RELY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while TENB trades at $42.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TENB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TENB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while FOUR trades at $43.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FOUR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while DOX trades at $42.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DOX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PAY trades at $33.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PAY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while DLO trades at $13.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check DLO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ESMT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CORZZ trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CORZZ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CORZ trades at $11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CORZ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while APPN trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 59.32. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check APPN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CORZW trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CORZW's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while AVPT trades at $16.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 45.94. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check AVPT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SWI's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CLBT trades at $12.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 53.59. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CLBT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check EVOP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while TDC trades at $31.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check TDC's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while EEFT trades at $70.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check EEFT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PAYO trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PAYO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while RAMP trades at $38.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RAMP's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while CSGS trades at $80.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check CSGS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NTCT trades at $31.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NTCT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GCT trades at $58.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GCT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check AVDX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GETVV's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check FORG's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GSKY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while ATEN trades at $24.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ATEN's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while MQ trades at $18.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 191.20. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check MQ's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while NYAX trades at $47.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 225.88. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check NYAX's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PRGS trades at $43.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PRGS's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GET's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while STNE trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check STNE's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check STER's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check ZUO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check SUMO's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check GB's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PGY trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PGY's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while BASE trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BASE's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while PAYA trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check PAYA's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, RDWR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while RDWR trades at $29.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas RDWR's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RDWR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to RDWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check RDWR's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, VRNT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while VRNT trades at $20.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas VRNT's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRNT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is more volatile compared to VRNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check VRNT's competition here

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FFIV stands at 17.7B. In comparison, BAND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFIV is priced at $310.84 on the NASDAQ, while BAND trades at $40.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FFIV currently has a P/E ratio of 18.39, whereas BAND's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FFIV's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFIV is less volatile compared to BAND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFIV.Check BAND's competition here