FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 788.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while V trades at $423.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas V's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to V's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to V. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check V's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 571.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while MA trades at $661.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check MA's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 217.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AXP trades at $324.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AXP's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PK trades at $15.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PK's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PI trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PJ trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PJ's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PL trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PL's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while COF trades at $195.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PN trades at $13.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check COF-PN's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while EP-PC trades at $49.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check EP-PC's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check DFS's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while PYPL trades at $58.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PYPL's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while IX trades at $32.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IX's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while GPN trades at $102.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check GPN's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PB trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SYF-PB's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SYF trades at $71.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SYF's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PA trades at $17.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SYF-PA's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SOFI trades at $15.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SOFI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AFRM trades at $65.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AFRM's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while KKRS trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check KKRS's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ALLY trades at $37.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ALLY's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OPFI-WT has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas OPFI-WT's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPFI-WT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OPFI-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OPFI-WT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PC's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while LU trades at $7.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LU's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while OMF trades at $55.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OMF's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SLMBP trades at $65.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SLMBP's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while CACC trades at $513.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check CACC's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ORCC's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SEZL trades at $147.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SEZL's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while KLAR trades at $13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -35.39. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check KLAR's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while NNI trades at $130.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NNI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while JSM trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check JSM's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ENVA trades at $169.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ENVA's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while BFH trades at $96.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check BFH's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SLM trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SLM's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ADS's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ECPG trades at $108.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ECPG's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while LC trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LC's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while UPST trades at $19.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check UPST's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while WU trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check WU's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PG trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PG's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PE trades at $17.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PE's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PF trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PF's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while EZPW trades at $28.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check EZPW's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AGM trades at $179.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-A trades at $125.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-A's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while PRG trades at $38.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PRG's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCP trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLCP's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCL trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLCL's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ATLC trades at $80.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLC's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCZ trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ATLCZ's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while JCAP trades at $19.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check JCAP's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TRNI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while TRNI trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas TRNI's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRNI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to TRNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check TRNI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check MGI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 900.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYI trades at $24.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAYI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 752.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while FINV trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check FINV's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while NAVI trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NAVI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while QFIN trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check QFIN's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 728.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while NEWTO trades at $25.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NEWTO's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 717.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while GDOT trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check GDOT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 676.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while WRLD trades at $140.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check WRLD's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SWRD has a market cap of 544.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SWRD trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SWRD's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SWRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SWRD's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 534.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while OPRT trades at $11.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OPRT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 530.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PD trades at $17.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check AGM-PD's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check QD's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, OPFI has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas OPFI's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OPFI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to OPFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check OPFI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 511.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while TREE trades at $35.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check TREE's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while PRAA trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PRAA's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAYZ's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while LPRO trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LPRO's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 322.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while RM trades at $34.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RM's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 298.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ORBS trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ORBS's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYL trades at $25.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAYL's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while HTT trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check HTT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while RWAY trades at $6.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check RWAY's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 269.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while PMTS trades at $23.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PMTS's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TROO has a market cap of 250.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while TROO trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas TROO's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TROO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to TROO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check TROO's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while CPSS trades at $10.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check CPSS's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while MFIN trades at $9.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check MFIN's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SWKHL has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SWKHL trades at $25.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SWKHL's P/E ratio is -29.14. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWKHL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to SWKHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SWKHL's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SUNL's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while FOA trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check FOA's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while LX trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check LX's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NISN's ROE of -2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NISN's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while JFIN trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check JFIN's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while SUIG trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check SUIG's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check FOA-WT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ELVT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ADBT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ADBT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ADBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ADBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ADBT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check NICK's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while ANTA trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check ANTA's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while VRM trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check VRM's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while XYF trades at $5.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check XYF's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VAI has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while VAI trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas VAI's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to VAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check VAI's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while YRD trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check YRD's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PTIV has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while PTIV trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PTIV's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTIV's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is more volatile compared to PTIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PTIV's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check JT's competition here

FirstCash Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: FCFS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCFS stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCFS is priced at $182.61 on the NASDAQ, while PT trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCFS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.03, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, FCFS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCFS is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCFS.Check PT's competition here