LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 680.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while V trades at $364.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas V's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to V's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to V. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check V's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 503.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while MA trades at $574.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MA's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 228.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AXP trades at $338.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AXP's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while COF trades at $221.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PN trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PN's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PI trades at $17.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PL trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PL's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PK trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PK's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PJ trades at $16.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PJ's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while BNH trades at $15.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BNH's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while BNJ trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BNJ's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while PYPL trades at $60.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PYPL's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DFS's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while IX trades at $39.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IX's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SYF trades at $80.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SYF's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PB trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SYF-PB's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PA trades at $19.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SYF-PA's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AFRM trades at $73.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 66.87. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AFRM's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SOFI trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 40.14. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SOFI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while GPN trades at $90.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check GPN's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while TRU trades at $79.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check TRU's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while KKRS trades at $16.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check KKRS's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, OPFI-WT has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI-WT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas OPFI-WT's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to OPFI-WT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to OPFI-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OPFI-WT's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AEFC trades at $18.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AEFC's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ALLY trades at $43.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ALLY's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PC's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while FCFS trades at $212.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FCFS's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while OMF trades at $64.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OMF's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SLMBP trades at $74.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SLMBP's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ENVA trades at $262.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ENVA's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while CACC trades at $570.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CACC's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while CGABL trades at $16.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is 59.08. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CGABL's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while KLAR trades at $15.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -39.63. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check KLAR's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while OBDC trades at $11.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OBDC's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ORCC's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SLM trades at $26.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SLM's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while JSM trades at $17.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check JSM's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while NNI trades at $125.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NNI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while BFH trades at $111.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BFH's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SEZL trades at $117.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SEZL's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, HCXY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while HCXY trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HCXY's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to HCXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HCXY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check HCXY's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ADS's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while UPST trades at $29.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check UPST's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGM trades at $229.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while WU trades at $7.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check WU's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while LC trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LC's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PE trades at $20.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PE's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-A trades at $161.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-A's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PF's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PG trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.96. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PG's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while EZPW trades at $29.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check EZPW's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCL trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLCL's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCZ trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLCZ's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCP trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLCP's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while PRG trades at $41.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PRG's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while QFIN trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check QFIN's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ATLC trades at $97.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLC's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while JCAP trades at $23.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check JCAP's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while LU trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LU's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, TRNI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while TRNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TRNI's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to TRNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to TRNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check TRNI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while FINV trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FINV's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MGI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 900M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYI trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAYI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 881.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while WRLD trades at $189.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check WRLD's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 845.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while NAVI trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NAVI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 766.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while GDOT trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check GDOT's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while PRAA trades at $19.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PRAA's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 736.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while NEWTO trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NEWTO's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 622.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PD trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PD's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, OPFI has a market cap of 599.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas OPFI's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to OPFI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to OPFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OPFI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check QD's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 432M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while NEWTI trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NEWTI's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 430.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while NEWTG trades at $25.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NEWTG's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while CURR trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CURR's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 402.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while HTT trades at $2.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check HTT's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAYZ's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while LPRO trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LPRO's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 340.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while OPRT trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OPRT's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while PMTS trades at $27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PMTS's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 312.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while RM trades at $33.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RM's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while RWAY trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAY's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while MFIN trades at $11.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MFIN's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYL trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAYL's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, TROO has a market cap of 240.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while TROO trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TROO's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to TROO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to TROO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check TROO's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 226M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while LX trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LX's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while IPFXW trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IPFXW's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 198.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while CPSS trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CPSS's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 186.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while FOA trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to FOA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FOA's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SUNL's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 121.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while JFIN trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check JFIN's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while YRD trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check YRD's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ANTA trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ANTA's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NISN's ROE of -2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NISN's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FOA-WT's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ELVT's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NICK's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while XYF trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check XYF's competition here

LendingTree, Inc. (NASDAQ: TREE) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 436M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $31.25 on the NASDAQ, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.70%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check JT's competition here