LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 623.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while V trades at $325.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check V's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 437.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while MA trades at $495.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 217.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AXP trades at $318.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AXP's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while COF-PJ trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PJ's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while COF-PK trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PK's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while COF-PI trades at $17.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while COF-PN trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PN's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while COF trades at $183.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 56.42. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 112.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while COF-PL trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check COF-PL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while BNH trades at $15.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BNH's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check DFS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while IX trades at $38.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IX's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while PYPL trades at $41.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PYPL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SUNB trades at $83.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SUNB's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SYF trades at $72.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SYF's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SYF-PB trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SYF-PB's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SYF-PA trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SYF-PA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SOFI trades at $16.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SOFI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while GPN trades at $63.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check GPN's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while KKRS trades at $16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check KKRS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ALLY trades at $43.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ALLY's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while FCFS trades at $229.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FCFS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SLMBP trades at $74.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SLMBP's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while OMF trades at $55.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OMF's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while CACC trades at $569.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CACC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while CGABL trades at $16.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CGABL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while OBDC trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OBDC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ORCC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while JSM trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check JSM's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NNI trades at $128.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NNI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ENVA trades at $179.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ENVA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SLM trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SLM's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SEZL trades at $121.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SEZL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while BFH trades at $94.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BFH's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while UPST trades at $31.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 75.76. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check UPST's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ADS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while WU trades at $7.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check WU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while LC trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AGM trades at $173.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while EZPW trades at $32.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check EZPW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while QFIN trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check QFIN's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AGM-A trades at $135.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-A's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ATLC trades at $88.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ATLCP trades at $24.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLCP's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ATLCL trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLCL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ATLCZ trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ATLCZ's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while FINV trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FINV's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MGI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while OCSL trades at $11.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OCSL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 897.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while JCAP trades at $16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check JCAP's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 891.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while RWAYI trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAYI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 885.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while BBDC trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check BBDC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 786.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while WRLD trades at $169.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check WRLD's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NAVI trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -12.82. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NAVI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 738.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NEWTO trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NEWTO's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while GDOT trades at $12.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check GDOT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 609.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AGM-PD trades at $20.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PD's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NRDS trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NRDS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 592.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while PRAA trades at $15.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PRAA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 561.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while LU trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LU's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check QD's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while MCVT trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MCVT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 472.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while HTT trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check HTT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 433.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while IACO trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IACO's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 429.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while KRAQ trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check KRAQ's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAYZ's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 389.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NEWTI trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NEWTI's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 389.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NEWTG trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NEWTG's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 347.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while LX trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LX's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while RM trades at $36.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RM's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while LPRO trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check LPRO's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while IPFX trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IPFX's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while IPFXW trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IPFXW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 229.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while MFIN trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check MFIN's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 226.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while CURR trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CURR's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while OPRT trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OPRT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 224.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AGM-PE trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PE's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 215.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while RWAY trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAY's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 215.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while RWAYL trades at $25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check RWAYL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while PMTS trades at $18.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check PMTS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AGM-PF trades at $18.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PF's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while CPSS trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check CPSS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AGM-PG trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AGM-PG's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 173.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while FOA trades at $19.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FOA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while EMIS trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check EMIS's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ANTA trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ANTA's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check SUNL's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while AHG trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check AHG's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while YRD trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check YRD's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NISN's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check FOA-WT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check ELVT's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check NICK's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while XYF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check XYF's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while OMCC trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check OMCC's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while KRAQW trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is more volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check KRAQW's competition here

TREE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TREE stands at 507.5M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TREE is priced at $36.37, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TREE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.82, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, TREE's ROE is +0.86%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TREE is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TREE.Check JT's competition here