Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. (FFHL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FFHL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFHL | $8.30 | +0.00% | 695.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $41.36 | +2.12% | 21.7B | 57.44 | $0.72 | +4.53% |
| PKG | $227.33 | +3.60% | 20.3B | 27.62 | $8.23 | +2.31% |
| IP | $34.12 | +3.83% | 18.1B | -6.57 | -$5.19 | +5.81% |
| AMCR | $38.83 | +2.67% | 18B | 31.06 | $1.25 | +6.78% |
| BALL | $54.18 | +2.96% | 14.4B | 15.80 | $3.43 | +1.46% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $159.35 | +4.14% | 12.2B | 17.94 | $8.88 | +2.45% |
| CCK | $95.67 | +3.94% | 10.7B | 15.21 | $6.29 | +1.28% |
Stock Comparison
FFHL vs BLL Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check BLL's competition here
FFHL vs SW Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SW trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check SW's competition here
FFHL vs PKG Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while PKG trades at $227.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check PKG's competition here
FFHL vs IP Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while IP trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check IP's competition here
FFHL vs AMCR Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while AMCR trades at $38.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check AMCR's competition here
FFHL vs BALL Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while BALL trades at $54.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check BALL's competition here
FFHL vs WRK Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check WRK's competition here
FFHL vs AVY Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while AVY trades at $159.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check AVY's competition here
FFHL vs CCK Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while CCK trades at $95.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check CCK's competition here
FFHL vs BERY Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check BERY's competition here
FFHL vs SEE Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check SEE's competition here
FFHL vs SON Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SON trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check SON's competition here
FFHL vs REYN Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while REYN trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check REYN's competition here
FFHL vs SLGN Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SLGN trades at $38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check SLGN's competition here
FFHL vs PTVE Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check PTVE's competition here
FFHL vs GPK Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while GPK trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check GPK's competition here
FFHL vs GEF-B Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while GEF-B trades at $82.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check GEF-B's competition here
FFHL vs GEF Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while GEF trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check GEF's competition here
FFHL vs AMBP Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while AMBP trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -407.00. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check AMBP's competition here
FFHL vs TRS Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while TRS trades at $40.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 115.83. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check TRS's competition here
FFHL vs OI Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while OI trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check OI's competition here
FFHL vs MYE Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 978.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while MYE trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check MYE's competition here
FFHL vs PACK Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 593.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while PACK trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check PACK's competition here
FFHL vs KRT Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 583.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while KRT trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check KRT's competition here
FFHL vs OCTO Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check OCTO's competition here
FFHL vs TUP Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check TUP's competition here
FFHL vs MGIH Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while MGIH trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check MGIH's competition here
FFHL vs YHGJ Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while YHGJ trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check YHGJ's competition here
FFHL vs DSS Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while DSS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check DSS's competition here
FFHL vs TYDE Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check TYDE's competition here
FFHL vs ARD Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.Check ARD's competition here
FFHL vs UNFL Comparison June 2026
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.4M. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -46.33%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FFHL has daily volatility of 2.19 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here