Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SW | $43.32 | +1.48% | 22.7B | 60.15 | $0.72 | +4.07% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| PKG | $228.23 | +1.71% | 20.3B | 27.71 | $8.24 | +2.18% |
| IP | $36.15 | +3.43% | 19.1B | -6.97 | -$5.19 | +5.16% |
| AMCR | $40.60 | +1.70% | 18.8B | 32.48 | $1.25 | +6.38% |
| BALL | $56.98 | +1.14% | 15.2B | 16.61 | $3.43 | +1.40% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $159.25 | +0.31% | 12.2B | 17.93 | $8.88 | +2.39% |
| CCK | $98.95 | +1.31% | 11.1B | 15.73 | $6.29 | +1.23% |
| BERY | $67.58 | +3.97% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SW vs BLL Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check BLL's competition here
SW vs PKG Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while PKG trades at $228.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check PKG's competition here
SW vs IP Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while IP trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check IP's competition here
SW vs AMCR Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while AMCR trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check AMCR's competition here
SW vs BALL Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while BALL trades at $56.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check BALL's competition here
SW vs WRK Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check WRK's competition here
SW vs AVY Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while AVY trades at $159.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check AVY's competition here
SW vs CCK Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while CCK trades at $98.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check CCK's competition here
SW vs BERY Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check BERY's competition here
SW vs SEE Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check SEE's competition here
SW vs SON Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while SON trades at $50.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check SON's competition here
SW vs REYN Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while REYN trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check REYN's competition here
SW vs SLGN Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while SLGN trades at $40.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check SLGN's competition here
SW vs PTVE Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check PTVE's competition here
SW vs GPK Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while GPK trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check GPK's competition here
SW vs GEF Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while GEF trades at $68.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check GEF's competition here
SW vs GEF-B Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while GEF-B trades at $85.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check GEF-B's competition here
SW vs AMBP Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while AMBP trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -422.00. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check AMBP's competition here
SW vs TRS Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while TRS trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 118.06. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check TRS's competition here
SW vs OI Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while OI trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check OI's competition here
SW vs MYE Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while MYE trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check MYE's competition here
SW vs FFHL Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check FFHL's competition here
SW vs PACK Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 625.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while PACK trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check PACK's competition here
SW vs KRT Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 600.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while KRT trades at $30.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check KRT's competition here
SW vs OCTO Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check OCTO's competition here
SW vs TUP Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check TUP's competition here
SW vs MGIH Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while MGIH trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check MGIH's competition here
SW vs YHGJ Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while YHGJ trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check YHGJ's competition here
SW vs DSS Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while DSS trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check DSS's competition here
SW vs TYDE Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check TYDE's competition here
SW vs ARD Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SW is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SW.Check ARD's competition here
SW vs UNFL Comparison June 2026
SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SW stands at 22.7B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SW is priced at $43.32, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SW currently has a P/E ratio of 60.15, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SW's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SW has daily volatility of 4.12 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here