Glatfelter Corporation (GLT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLT | $21.05 | N/A | 73.7M | -1.04 | -$20.28 | N/A |
| WY | $24.32 | -0.04% | 17.5B | 43.43 | $0.56 | +3.45% |
| SUZ | $8.39 | +1.33% | 10.4B | 4.64 | $1.81 | +2.54% |
| LPX | $77.56 | +3.02% | 5.4B | 66.29 | $1.17 | +1.50% |
| WFG | $70.20 | -0.27% | 5.3B | -4.70 | -$14.94 | +1.82% |
| UFPI | $86.58 | +3.10% | 4.9B | 18.86 | $4.59 | +1.64% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SLVM | $39.66 | +0.18% | 1.6B | 15.80 | $2.51 | +4.54% |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $7.92 | +1.54% | 436.5M | 5.62 | $1.41 | +5.05% |
Stock Comparison
GLT vs WY Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while WY trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check WY's competition here
GLT vs SUZ Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while SUZ trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check SUZ's competition here
GLT vs LPX Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while LPX trades at $77.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 66.29. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check LPX's competition here
GLT vs WFG Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while WFG trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check WFG's competition here
GLT vs UFPI Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while UFPI trades at $86.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check UFPI's competition here
GLT vs RFP Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check RFP's competition here
GLT vs SLVM Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while SLVM trades at $39.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check SLVM's competition here
GLT vs SWM Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check SWM's competition here
GLT vs MATV Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while MATV trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check MATV's competition here
GLT vs CLW Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 270.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while CLW trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check CLW's competition here
GLT vs MERC Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while MERC trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MERC's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check MERC's competition here
GLT vs EVA Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check EVA's competition here
GLT vs JCTCF Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT and JCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCTCF's competition here
GLT vs JCTC Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while JCTC trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check JCTC's competition here
GLT vs NWGL Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while NWGL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check NWGL's competition here
GLT vs ITP Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while ITP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check ITP's competition here
GLT vs KS Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT and KS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KS's competition here
GLT vs AEPI Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check AEPI's competition here
GLT vs DEL Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check DEL's competition here
GLT vs UFS Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check UFS's competition here
GLT vs VRS Comparison June 2026
GLT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLT stands at 73.7M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLT is priced at $21.05, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, GLT's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLT is less volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLT.Check VRS's competition here