Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while IP trades at $41.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -252.28. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check IP's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while SUZ trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +38.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check SUZ's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while WFG trades at $69.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check WFG's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while LPX trades at $73.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check LPX's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while UFPI trades at $88.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check UFPI's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while BCC trades at $82.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check BCC's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while RFP trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to RFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check RFP's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while SLVM trades at $37.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check SLVM's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while SWM trades at $23.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check SWM's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 661.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while MATV trades at $12.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check MATV's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 349.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while CLW trades at $21.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check CLW's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while GLT trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check GLT's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while EVA trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check EVA's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while MERC trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MERC's ROE of -6.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check MERC's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check JCTCF's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while JCTC trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check JCTC's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while NWGL trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check NWGL's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while ITP trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check ITP's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while UFS trades at $55.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check UFS's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while KS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas KS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check KS's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while AEPI trades at $109.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check AEPI's competition here

Verso Corporation (NYSE: VRS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRS stands at 0. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VRS is priced at $26.99 on the NYSE, while DEL trades at $93.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRS currently has a P/E ratio of -278.25, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRS's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRS is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRS.Check DEL's competition here