Turtle Beach Corporation (HEAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HEAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| AAPL | $292.65 | -2.95% | 4.3T | 35.09 | $8.28 | +0.36% |
| SONY | $20.56 | -7.20% | 125.5B | 19.92 | $1.07 | +0.76% |
| NXT | $124.51 | -0.91% | 17.9B | 31.06 | $3.84 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.66 | -6.15% | 4.6B | -92.40 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $15.32 | +2.41% | 1.8B | 90.47 | $0.17 | N/A |
| KOPN | $5.12 | -6.40% | 901.8M | 493.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| VUZI | $3.05 | -10.69% | 265.3M | -7.97 | -$0.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HEAR vs AAPL Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while AAPL trades at $292.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check AAPL's competition here
HEAR vs SONY Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONY trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONY's competition here
HEAR vs NXT Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while NXT trades at $124.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check NXT's competition here
HEAR vs LPL Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while LPL trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -92.40. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check LPL's competition here
HEAR vs BWSN Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWSN's competition here
HEAR vs VZIO Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VZIO's competition here
HEAR vs SONO Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONO trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is 90.47. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SONO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONO's competition here
HEAR vs KOPN Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 901.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while KOPN trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 493.00. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check KOPN's competition here
HEAR vs VUZI Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VUZI trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VUZI's competition here
HEAR vs TBCH Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while TBCH trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 653.00. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check TBCH's competition here
HEAR vs VOXX Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VOXX's competition here
HEAR vs GPRO Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while GPRO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check GPRO's competition here
HEAR vs BWNB Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWNB trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWNB's competition here
HEAR vs ZEPP Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while ZEPP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check ZEPP's competition here
HEAR vs KOSS Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while KOSS trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -36.18. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check KOSS's competition here
HEAR vs WETH Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WETH trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 2.06. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WETH's competition here
HEAR vs FEBO Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while FEBO trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check FEBO's competition here
HEAR vs PXDT Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check PXDT's competition here
HEAR vs MSN Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MSN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MSN's competition here
HEAR vs MICS Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MICS's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MICS's competition here
HEAR vs UTME Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check UTME's competition here
HEAR vs RIME Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while RIME trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RIME's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check RIME's competition here
HEAR vs WLDSW Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDSW trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDSW's competition here
HEAR vs BOXL Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 736.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BOXL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -6.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BOXL's competition here
HEAR vs WTO Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 582.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WTO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WTO's competition here
HEAR vs WLDS Comparison June 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 232.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDS trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDS's competition here