Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while AAPL trades at $309.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check AAPL's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while SONY trades at $23.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check SONY's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while LPL trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check LPL's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while BWSN trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BWSN's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while VZIO trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VZIO's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while HEAR trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HEAR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check HEAR's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while TBCH trades at $12.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 253.20. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TBCH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check TBCH's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 244.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while VUZI trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VUZI's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while VOXX trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VOXX's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while GPRO trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -5.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check GPRO's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while ZEPP trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check ZEPP's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while UEIC trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check UEIC's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while KOSS trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -32.45. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check KOSS's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while FOXX trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FOXX's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while MSN trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MSN's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while PXDT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check PXDT's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while FEBO trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FEBO's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while MICS trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MICS's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MICS's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while UTME trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check UTME's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while BOXL trades at $5.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -12.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BOXL's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while WLDSW trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDSW's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while WTO trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WTO's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 852.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while RIME trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RIME's ROE of -6.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check RIME's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 724.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while EVLVW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check EVLVW's competition here

Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 259.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $15.83 on the NASDAQ, while WLDS trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDS's competition here